Posted on 02/14/2019 12:57:40 PM PST by detective
WHY THE DNC WAS NOT HACKED BY THE RUSSIANS
The FBI, CIA and NSA claim that the DNC emails published by WIKILEAKS on July 26, 2016 were obtained via a Russian hack, but more than three years after the alleged “hack” no forensic evidence has been produced to support that claim. In fact, the available forensic evidence contradicts the official account that blames the leak of the DNC emails on a Russian internet “intrusion”. The existing evidence supports an alternative explanation–the files taken from the DNC on between 23 and 25 May 2016 and were copied onto a file storage device, such as a thumb drive.
If the Russians actually had conducted an internet based hack of the DNC computer network then the evidence of such an attack would have been collected and stored by the National Security Agency. The technical systems to accomplish this task have been in place since 2002. The NSA had an opportunity to make it clear that there was irrefutable proof of Russian meddling, particularly with regard to the DNC hack, when it signed on to the January 2017 “Intelligence Community Assessment,” regarding Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election:
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
The Russians NEVER hacked the DNC servers.
Seth Rich?
Seth Rich MURDER
Seth Rich downloaded the data onto a thumb Drive and sent it to Wikileaks. ASSANGE AS MUCH AS SAID SO..............
Yep, Seth Rich.
But no one in the MSM will dare to suggest that....
The minute this is admitted, the question of who murdered Seth Rich becomes very important
WE MAY NEVER KNOW THE ‘WHO’, ONLY THE ‘WHY’.....................
lol
Every single one of us experienced comp sci computer security professionals here on FR called this FRAUD OF A CLAIM OF BEING HACKED exactly what it was. We knew it then and the “firm” the Democrats hired were a joke and had connections to the DNC.
If a tree falls in a forest, but no one is around to hear it, did it really make a noise?
Unfortunately, partisan politics overrides facts, so no one will care.
Well for f***s sake, Bill Binney has been saying this for two years now! Why do we listen to poli sci and journo majors instead of the experts??
Just as we always knew, it was an internal inside job, just as Julian Assange has always said. Funny how this took 3 years to come out.
“The Russians NEVER hacked the DNC servers. “
No NEED !
Wasserman’s ‘PAKYS IT’ Crew had it all in their hands for years !
The FBI, CIA and NSA all lied about this. Why aren’t they being held accountable for that?
I think Seth did this as the direction of the Hillary mob, in order to blame Trump.
“the DA’s gotta buiId a case.|BuiIding a case is Iike buiIding a house.
Each piece of evidence is a buiIding bIock.
He wants to make|a brick bunker of a buiIding.
He wants to use serious,|soIid-Iooking bricks, Iike these, right?
- Right.|- Let me show you something.
He’s gonna show you the bricks.|He’II show you they got straight sides.
He’II show you how they got the right shape.
He’II show them to you|in a very speciaI way...
..so that they appear to have|everything a brick shouId have.
But there’s one thing|he’s not gonna show you.
When you Iook at the bricks at the right|angIe, they’re as thin as this pIaying card.
His whoIe case is an iIIusion, a magic trick.
It has to be an iIIusion, cos you’re innocent.”
If only we had a Vincent Gambini asking the right questions.
The minute this is admitted, the question of who murdered Seth Rich becomes very important
I’m quite sure the actual perps reached room temperature shortly after committing the murder.
You are saying that Hillary knew in May 2016 that she was going to lose, so she ordered the sabotage of her campaign just to spite Trump?WHOA!
In May 2016, neither one of them had been officially nominated yet!
I thought that although the Brennan/Comey spin was that “all 17 agencies in the national security community” agreed with their Russian hacker narrative, only 2 really did (themselves). NSA said the evidence was insufficient to support their conclusions. Am I misremembering this?
The article says the NSA would have had the evidence had a Russian hacking incident occurred, and faults them for not saying “no incident occurred”. Being 100% sure of a negative is a tall order (and they would not want to prove publicly how they would know), so I am not surprised the NSA would dodge saying that.
>>>Funny how this took 3 years to come out.
I wonder what our security agency are good for, even the puzzle palace NSA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.