Posted on 02/11/2019 10:02:05 AM PST by BenLurkin
In American Cosmic, D.W. Pasulka, a professor of religious studies at the University of North Carolina, Wilmington, draws on a six-year ethnographic study and the work of Carl Jung (Flying Saucers) and Jacques Vallee (Passport to Magonia and The Invisible College) to explain the widespread belief in aliens. Pasulka identifies three aspects of UFO inquiry: physical evidence (crash sites and artifacts); testimonials made by experiencers; and the persistence of belief whether or not there is verifiable evidence to support it.
Pasulka also challenges the view that UFO believers are uneducated, fringe members of society. Some very well-regarded scientists, she indicates, are convinced that non-humans have visited Planet Earth; they have chosen to remain anonymous to protect their professional reputations.
Using a method common among anthropologists, Pasulka maintains she neither believes nor disbelieves but insists that testimonials are, in important ways, real. This approach allows her to gauge the impact and internal logic of a thriving belief system.
Pasulka regards them as heroes, who have the guts and ability to take on skeptics, and are fighting the good fight for the right reasons: because they believe, and they would say, because they know.
Pasulka turns her attention to television shows and movies. Models of events can be conflated, she asserts, even when one representation is real and the other is fictional. The likelihood of putting a model in the wrong bucket increases when producers (whose clients include National Geographic, The History Channel, and The Smithsonian) use a genre called specialist factual programming to fuse archival material and special effects to create realistic montages, with documentary in the title.
These productions influence memory, Pasulka emphasizes; they contribute to belief in fabricated UFO phenomena.
(Excerpt) Read more at psychologytoday.com ...
I have a better question that is OT a little.
Why did Mike Stone’s daughter call him Mike instead of dad or pop (or similar) in The Streets Of SF?
Step-daughter, maybe?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.