I’m all for it.
No sympathy for people who beat up and abuse animals.
I am for it too.
Not a function of the Federal Govt....get back to real business, balance the darn budget!
Same here, but in and of itself, this is not a function of the federal government.
It’s a bad idea if you have problem skunks killing your poultry. You can’t exactly shoot a skunk without repercussions but drowning prevent one from “going off.”
Seriously? Do we really need Famous But Incompetent special agents doing raids on farms at the behest of PETA.
Because that is what you will get for federalizing animal cruelty.
I prefer it remain a state/county issue, thanks.
I’m for it too, and so is my kitty. In my state, animals have some rights to the extent that people treat them well, but just 30 miles away in the next state, animals are treated miserably.
We are all God’s creatures.
I think that this is something for general State Law, not federal over-reach.
Very outside the constitutional limits.
We are going to have leftist comfort animal clowns in California telling Kentucky bluegrass trainers how to train horses.
I love to see animals well treated. Jeff Flakes included. But we don’t need the feds getting into yet another area they don’t belong and want a one-size-fits all.
Sorry to strongly disagree with you — please reconsider.
I am too, but I am not for socialist libtard PETA-types becoming enforcers of it, because they will just warp the grounds to interfere with regular pet owners.
They dont even say pet owners in their twisted lingo. They want to do away with ownership when it is the sole reason for virtually all pets having better lives than they otherwise would have.
On the plus side this would give more power to go after hoarders who just get slaps on the wrist, damage other peoples houses, and move and go and do it all again.
Hey! I can go to jail for life for burning a shush kabobs! 2 animal hate crime laws broken in 1 meal!