Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army testing 1000-mile ‘super gun’ that can be used to strike Chinese targets without retaliation
thenationalsentinel.com ^ | January 25, 2019 | Staff

Posted on 01/25/2019 9:55:01 AM PST by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 01/25/2019 9:55:01 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Somewhere...

Gerald Bull is smiling.

2 posted on 01/25/2019 9:58:23 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

That was the name that popped into my mind when I read the headline.


3 posted on 01/25/2019 9:59:21 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Great, how many billions is this boondoggle going to cost us while invaders are streaming over the border and voting in our elections? I wish just one of these “gee whiz” weapons would prove operational in less than a generation. But I guess a military industrial complex generation needs their paychecks.


4 posted on 01/25/2019 10:01:51 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Who is Gerald Bull. Got me curious.


5 posted on 01/25/2019 10:02:10 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I don’t see that a gun like that would our-perform a missile. Especially nap-of-the-earth cruise missiles.

A ballistic (non-guided) path is VERY easy to track and calculate when the projectile originated. And answer with a hyper-sonic, nap-of-the-earth cruise response.

...unless the long-range projectile is also stealthy.


6 posted on 01/25/2019 10:02:22 AM PST by William of Barsoom (In Omnia, Paratus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
“super gun” artillery piece capable of sending projectiles 1,000 miles downrange...

Placing it in the center of a 2000 mile border, 1000 miles to the right and 1000 miles to the left, could do wonders.

7 posted on 01/25/2019 10:03:31 AM PST by C210N (Republicans sign check fronts; 'Rats sign check backs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Gerald Bull was totally amazing.

A maverick, far ahead of this time:

The Werner Von Braun of artillery.

In the end, TOO good for his own good, I guess.


8 posted on 01/25/2019 10:03:36 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Gerald Bull chose his employers poorly ...


9 posted on 01/25/2019 10:04:33 AM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: William of Barsoom

I would prefer Rods From God. Which I happen to think we have tested and deployed. But I have no inside information. I’m just guessing.


10 posted on 01/25/2019 10:05:16 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

See post 8 above, for the nutshell version.

Gerald Bull took on a wide array of int’l clients who had artillery needs.

Eventually the Israelis started to dislike it.

Eh....SOMETHING happened to him, and it wasn’t good.


11 posted on 01/25/2019 10:05:18 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Same here! Got to be leveraging his research.

Maybe we’ll see the return of Coastal Artillery! Sign me up.


12 posted on 01/25/2019 10:06:37 AM PST by HombreSecreto (The new Oldsmobiles are in early this year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The cost of firing the weapon would be the advantage over a cruise missile.


13 posted on 01/25/2019 10:06:59 AM PST by Agatsu77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HombreSecreto

We can shoot down artillery shells


14 posted on 01/25/2019 10:07:37 AM PST by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: William of Barsoom

“I don’t see that a gun like that would our-perform a missile. Especially nap-of-the-earth cruise missiles.

A ballistic (non-guided) path is VERY easy to track and calculate when the projectile originated. And answer with a hyper-sonic, nap-of-the-earth cruise response.

...unless the long-range projectile is also stealthy.”

An artillery shell, even a very sophisticated artillery shell, is way, way cheaper than a missile. So you get lower cost and a much higher number of deliveries on target at a rapid pace.


15 posted on 01/25/2019 10:07:39 AM PST by Bayan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I yearn more for the days when battleships were the ultimate weapon.

This new stuff is just ridiculous.


16 posted on 01/25/2019 10:09:13 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
" the military has a mission requirement to outrage enemy guns.""

Here's an outraged gun's best friend, an angry bullet.


17 posted on 01/25/2019 10:09:26 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

We can shoot down artillery shells

><

Lasers?


18 posted on 01/25/2019 10:09:57 AM PST by laplata (The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Battleships have tremendous romantic appeal. So much firepower. It’s pure, flamboyant Aggro.

But, alas, they don’t make much sense anymore.


19 posted on 01/25/2019 10:11:34 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Iron Dome missiles


20 posted on 01/25/2019 10:12:20 AM PST by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson