Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: reed13k

Seems to me that POTUS (may re-election be upon him) formally required Department heads to identify redundancies and re-organize their organizations.

And, wasn’t that re-org report due sometime this month.

Dang, gotta dig that back up. That last part might be wrong...


1,320 posted on 01/17/2019 5:52:15 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1166 | View Replies ]


To: Cletus.D.Yokel; Pete from Shawnee Mission

He did require those department head recommendations.

What I was trying to say is that the processes in the different departments require certain steps to make changes and those can be “slow walked” to prevent or disrupt the changes from occurring or limit the impact by “process owners” etc.

“oh sorry this has to be rewritten you forgot about policy xyz and you misspelled these words and the font is 10 vs 12 per procedure it needs to be 12” etc

While there is a reason for this stuff - I work a lot of QA so I deal with regulated process change a ton - it’s an 80/20 thing where we can go back and fix the 20 but we need the 80 NOW! Perfection is the enemy of the good.

If a large number of these folks are now out of the way then the implementation of the recommendations for personnel changes, process and policy changes, etc becomes much easier to complete.

So even if the RIF doesn’t happen the processes and policy changes that could lead to later reductions could be put in place more quickly during the shut down.

And to be fair - the majority of these disruptors may not even mean to be disruptors. In many cases they have a certain job to do and are trying to ensure it’s done correctly. However, as reported there are those that are intentionally disrupting as well.

I’ve seen it in business - it’s the whole “who moved my cheese” thing in change management. I had one place where I had to completely redo everything. The only way I finally got through to the different stake holders was to take copies of the procedures in front of everyone involved and shred them in the meeting room. Then I said “Now that is all gone it’s in the past. Today we can do anything we want and we start from scratch.” Some didn’t know what to do after that they were nearly in tears - the existing process was all they knew. Others were cheering they had been trying to change things for years.


1,351 posted on 01/17/2019 7:09:45 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1320 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson