Butt....
Bagster points out that Q is moving away from the current “direct info dissemination” to his more familiar Socratic style in this drop.
Is this a slap upside the noggin to get the anons back into a “think for yourself” mode?
KitJ: What are the chans saying about “public access to intel?”
Enigo: any reports from TFC?
I couldn't say. Been very busy this week and haven't had time to creep around over there.
As for your question, I think Q is posing a rhetorical question that supports his access to sensitive information. Like, "The public can't access intel, but we can".