Posted on 01/10/2019 10:13:10 PM PST by ransomnote
Title: Talks to End U.S.-China Trade War Now Shift to Make-or-Break Rounds
Subtitle under photo: Trade negotiators, including Ted McKinney, the undersecretary for trade and foreign agricultural affairs, right, in Beijing on Tuesday.
By Keith Bradsher
Jan. 9, 2019
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/09/business/us-china-trade-talks-beijing.html
“In a statement after the talks ended, the United States trade representatives office said the two sides had discussed Chinas pledge to buy a substantial amount of American agricultural, energy and manufacturing products.
Negotiators also focused on White House concerns about Chinas approach to intellectual property protection and its practice of so-called forced technology transfer, the statement said.”
https://news.yahoo.com/mnuchin-says-china-u-planning-190926942.html
December 18, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said he would probably meet with the Chinese in January.
“The two sides are planning to meet in January, according to Chinese officials with knowledge of the discussions who asked not to be named as the talks were private. Chinas Ministry of Commerce didnt respond to a faxed request for comment.”
PS: In the Forbidden City, the location of the photo in Q drop #2669 is believed to be Shanghai Pudong Airport.
Mnuchin "sometime in January" and your first post talks about talks on Tuesday that already took place.
I don't think its that one. Q says "awaiting VIP arrival".
Also "senior US official" seems to refer to Mnuchin more than the others.
Or somebody else?
Bagster
Bagster
At what point is it mathematically impossible?
The very next day.
Red Castle.
Green Castle.
Public access to intel?
Q
He refers to the stories that came out about RBG the day after his post on the 6th as being a Q proof.
Then goes right into language about the military/national emergency building the wall.
Is he comparing the two separate events in the same way? We know Q predicted the military security long ago and moreso recently.
Or are the two events related somehow. When the biddy croaks, there will be one less derp vote on the SC, we do know that. Is Trump waiting for that? Is that the connection he's pointing us to?
What does he mean by "public access to intel"?
What intel?
Bagster
Is Mnuchin the most senior? Others sound like “officials” but Holdin’ out for senior. I think if I go back to FC, they’ll have dug up more choices. :/
Goodnight, all.
p.s. Just had athought.
Is Q in China awaiting a VIP? Is that why the odd hour postings?
#ScrewinWithMySchedule
#OnChinamanTime
#ThanksQ
Bagster
Right?
All that "civil war" talk all day every day on other threads, but all of a sudden....
Frikken amazing.
Bagster
Maybe I'm just being off the wall. Maybe not. But you might ponder the above and see what surfaces. In any case, be bold, please, if so.
Ah, if only we could get him to stand in the Korean DMZ.
Please consider reading them with your special dragon magic, dear heart.
GraceG Mocks Acosta Most Splendidly.
p.s. That's a good batch, Grace.
Bagster
You’d think the Chinese would still be concerned about that well connected executive arrested.
How Huawei’s CFO ended up in a Canadian jail cell
By Julia Horowitz, CNN Business
Updated 12:13 PM ET, Tue December 11, 2018
https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/11/business/huawei-cfo-arrest-details/index.html
“Meng, the daughter of Huawei’s founder, was taken into custody on December 1 the same day that President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping dined on steak in Buenos Aires and agreed to a truce in their trade war.”
There's always old reliable, Roe v.Wade.
Is Q signaling that dead RBG's replacement will be that female that has been talked about? What's her name again?
Surely she has SOME dirt the derps can dig up on her to try to kill her nomination.
This one is gonna negate the Roberts factor.
Laws yes.
Bagster
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.