Posted on 12/14/2018 7:46:26 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Christmas is right around the corner. During all the festivities and family gatherings, your grandmother, or some other relative, will inevitably try to cajole the whole family into an obligatory viewing of It’s a Wonderful Life. While the inspirational theme of one man being able to make a difference is touching, try not to take all of this film’s messages directly to heart, lest you desire reduced opportunity amid slower economic growth.
The film follows its supposed protagonist, George Bailey, from his young days of saving his little brother from drowning in a lake and stopping his boss from accidentally poisoning a child. However, where Bailey goes off the rails, and becomes an economic cautionary tale, is when he inherits his family’s Building and Loan after the death of his father.
George’s father, Peter Bailey was President of Bailey Brothers Building and Loan, and routinely butted heads with the film’s supposed antagonist, Henry Potter. Potter owns the bank and most businesses in the fictional town of Bedford Falls. The elder Bailey rants to his son that Potter only wants to liquidate their business because it’s one that he can’t get his greedy hands on. George later parrots this same anti-capitalist rhetoric once he picks up his father’s mantle.
Before elaborating on Bailey’s horribly flawed economic worldview, it is important to get some background on Potter, the man who should ultimately be considered the hero of Bedford Falls. We learn fairly early on in the film that Potter is a board member and stockholder in the Building and Loan. In all likelihood, the small Building and Loan is not a publicly traded company. Thus, it stands to reason that Potter was able to become a stockholder by giving Peter Bailey capital. If Potter truly wanted the Building and Loan to go under, he could have withheld his significant wealth from it. Instead, he invested, and later pushed for its liquidation because it was not making healthy business decisions or making a profit. This is counter to the Baileys’ narrative that he is a monopolistic pig who treats little people like cattle.
Potter’s background is a lesson on what concentration of wealth can mean for small businesses. Potter is able to use his considerable resources to fund family operations like the Bailey Brothers Building and Loan, among countless others in the fictional town. It is especially magnanimous considering how often the Bailey family smears Potter to anyone and everyone who will listen.
For viewers who may not have picked up on this subtext earlier in the film, it is revealed far more clearly later on when the Great Depression hits Bedford Falls. Bailey’s company is exposed as a fraud for its subprime loan schemes as, when there is a run on the Building and Loan, Bailey is unable to pay out. Potter, on the other hand, is financially secure enough and offers to buy out all of Bailey’s customers. After making this honorable offer, Bailey continues to degrade Potter, and convinces people that they don’t need their money and that it should instead stay tied up in his company. The Building and Loan can only run if Bailey can convince people to act counter to their self-interest.
Part of Bailey’s pitch to keep money in the Building and Loan was perhaps his most bold attack on the free market. He tells the mob that no one wants to live in the housing options Potter provides, calling them “overpriced slums.” However, if there were more affordable, liveable alternatives, people wouldn’t be in Potter’s homes. Yet, there is clearly a high demand for them, as they are more affordable than Bailey’s alternative.
Even after the misinformation campaign against him, Potter offers Bailey economic security when he comes to him for help after his uncle misplaced significant funds from the Building and Loan. Admittedly, the funds were mistakenly given to Potter himself, but given his contributions over the years and the Baileys’ poor business decisions, it was likely money Potter was owed anyway. But, Potter offers George a job, opportunity to travel, and prosperity for his family. Bailey considers it before declining and, again, smearing Potter as a greedy old man.
At this point, it has been established that Potter is responsible for most of the jobs in Bedford Falls, provides them with affordable housing options, and was willing to provide assistance when the economy went downhill. The moral of this film still rings true. One man can make a difference in the lives of so many others. However, it is Potter, not Bailey, who is that man.
There are other lessons to be learned as well. Wealthy businessmen with excess capital can use that money to prop up or help start entrepreneurs and small businesses. They can also use it to create opportunities for a wide range of individuals. It also shows that the market speaks louder than any anti-capitalist ever could, and that is evidenced by the well-being of the citizens of Bedford Falls. We can also see how the subprime loan scheme run by the Baileys forces investors and customers into economic dire straits. We have seen that play out numerous times in our nation’s history, most recently in 2008.
So, if you do get roped into watching It’s a Wonderful Life this holiday season, keep an open mind. Draw inspiration from the good that Henry Potter accomplished for the men and women of his town, and reject the anti-market, anti-capitalist narrative pushed by the Baileys.
Silly.
Potter was literally a thief and liar.
Because he defeated Voldemort?
“Potter offers Bailey economic security when he comes to him for help after his uncle misplaced significant funds from the Building and Loan).”
Potter offered him financial security before the lost funds (a three year contract in exchange for the building and loan. After Potter sole the 8K he called the sheriff to arrest Gearge.
I dislike the character of Potter immensely. I just wish he had his comeuppance. OTOH, I understand this movie was the first one Jimmy Stewart did after the war; he had some PTSD issues during the filming and he was actually crying on the bridge remembering his buddies in the war.
Potter was a warped frustrated, old man. He had no pride in his properties and only wanted to make as much money as possible. His idea of capitalism is similar to drug dealers who take over areas of cities and towns and suck all of the money out until their run-down shit-holes.
The reason George couldn’t pay out during the bank run was simple. The B&L had 30 or 60 days, I can’t remember the exact line, to close out the account, unlike a regular bank.
I see his point but it’s a stretch.
I see his point but it’s a stretch.
Seriously.
I didn’t bother reading the article. I have seen that movie 30 times if I have seen it once.
Potter was a horrible man.
Harry Potter???
Huh? Potter literally stole the deposits of people who had accounts with the Bailey Savings and Loan.
This is garbage.
LOL! Priceless.
Admittedly, the funds were mistakenly given to Potter himself, but given his contributions over the years and the Baileys’ poor business decisions, it was likely money Potter was owed anyway.
Reading into the script like that to justify adverse possession of money is not something I would expect to read from Freedom Works - especially since they were a key part of our March on DC in 2009.
Writer must be a character-less, soul-less millennial.
FReegards!
The villain? Right...
I love “It’s A Wonderful Life” (once a year, not more often), but I always thought that the Bedford Falls in George Bailey’s “if I’d never been born” vision looked a lot more interesting than the real thing. At least it had a night life.
......sigh.....
It was very obvious that the lure of a better job was simply to get control of the savings & loan. George Bailey would have found his job evaporating soon after the ownership was transferred.
They showed the town where Potter had no “opposition” with George never being born. It was like Sodom & Gomorrah. As pointed out, he effectively stole the S&L money Uncle Billy misplaced depositing at the bank. A reputable businessman would’ve returned the money. Potter is more reminiscent of the left-wing billionaires we see in California these days, soulless and evil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.