LOL again...
Just give us some "science-math" on the differing sizes of North America in these faked CGI earth hoaxes?
C'mon! You can do it... give us the real math on how the continents are different sizes!
Posted on 12/10/2018 6:35:08 PM PST by EdnaMode
LOL again...
Just give us some "science-math" on the differing sizes of North America in these faked CGI earth hoaxes?
C'mon! You can do it... give us the real math on how the continents are different sizes!
Please tell me you believe Musk actually put an open convertible in space. Hahahahaha!
One thing I have learned in my almost 70 years on this Earth is that there will be great men who will do great things. And just as surely there will be lesser men who will seek to denigrate and diminish the achievements of their betters. These lesser men will expend enormous amounts of time and effort in their vain and vapid quest to disparage the triumphs of those whom they know will always be worthier than they. And these petty and vindictive individuals do so simply to mollify their own inadequacy, of which they are keenly aware but have no recourse other than to lash out at others.
Calling people names is ridiculous. Are you in 4th grade?
You can't explain the science Musk's "convertible in space"... at all!
You can't explain the NASA globe "artwork".
You can't explain why the word "SEX" is written in the clouds on two of NASA's earth images 2012 and 2015
You can't explain the science behind the video transmission and uplink transceiver that apparently were left behind on the "moon" for the Apollo 17 "broadcast"...
APOLLO 17 FAKERY: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs
You can't explain the very steep curve math for the earth... and why we see such an expanse of earth every time we fly in an airplane...
You can't explain how Neil Armstrong's "Live"! video broadcast from the moon was done for his first step on the moon. (LOL) How did the camera get outside the module to take the shot? (Another cameraman left on the moon?)
You can't explain how the Bible NEVER mentions a round, orbiting around the sun earth... ever. (If that matters to you, as you are obviously not a Christian)
But you do use internet chat rooms on "Quora" as a place where of actual research or putting the Lord's word to the test, which we are called to do as Bereans...
... which is even more crazy.
Comments on "Quora" suffice as "research" for you?
You uphold "Quora" but you can't explain any of the math regarding how the continent of "North America" varies in size on NASA's paintings of "earth"...
But you want all Judeo Christians to bow down to Islam Loving, Climate Change loving liberals at NASA?
Grow a pair, and give us the evidence instead of whining about how the chat room chat on "Quora" is so special.
You're the one behind the curve here... NASA has been debunked for years now, especially for Judeo Christians... you need to catch up and quit shilling for atheist Leftwingers at NASA.
And you're a sex-obsessed idiot. That's not name-calling, just stating facts. You convict yourself by posting all those "sex" pictures. Sane people don't do those kind of things, at least not on a public forum.
And no, I won't respond to your ridiculous challenges. You're playing the ancient game of epistemological skepticism. Bertrand Russell had the best judgment on that (its crazy). So you might as well stop your childish games of mental masturbation. I'm not going to waste my time debating someone who is seriously cracked.
You've got no proof, you've given NO evidence or nor any common sense explanations.
You still have nothing. You can't explain why NASA's faked earth images have different sized continents, year to year... you can't explain any of it.
You are an intellectual coward, FRiend.
Here's a new one for you to explain away for us... LOL! Before and after the fish-eye round lens applied to Felix Baumgartner's CGI hoax to make sure the earth looked "round" and then they couldn't even remember where the "Zenith" logo should go... LOL!!!:
We all know your game. Its the same as conspiracy nuts everywhere. You bring up a bogus conspiracy, we obliterate it with facts and logic, and your response is then, oh, that's just more NASA lies. Don't you see how stupid that makes you look? And that is why I won't any time debunking your bogus "evidence" that has been rehashed and debunked time and time again. You're just doing a Gish Gallup, only using nonsense and gibberish instead of rationale thought. I don't have time for that. When you're my age, you become acutely aware that life is short, and I can't waste any more of it on debunking old-hat conspiracy theory posts from someone who is darn near certifiable. You call it cowardice, but in fact it is the wisest course, since debating a fool only makes one look like a fool.
You're probably childish enough to think that if you have the last word then you "won". Well, hey, knock yourself out. You can have the last word, because I'm done.
Let's start with another question: do you believe that there have been no actual people conspiring together for joint effort on something?
Do you remember Journolist and Sarah Palin/Breitbart? Are you saying that you do not believe there are actual "conspiracies" in the modern world?
Or is this just rehashed, boring old tropes in order to put me down, name-calling as if we're on a grammar school playground?
If you want to be a big boy, then show some intellectual guts, and answer my questions from previous posts to you.
Half a million miles for a “live” television broadcast from the “moon” which required a relay from Australia to Houston and then back again to “remote control” an analog color video camera (with year 1970 battery technology) in time to zoom and track with the fake lunar module lifting off from the film set of the “moon” in 1.5 seconds?
Nope. There were no international microwave transmissions allowing for a 1.5 second remote controlled camera on the moon to be operated by someone in Houston Texas for "live broadcast" on Apollo 17.
And this 1.5 seconds includes how the Australian tracking station converted the live video footage to broadcast quality before it “relayed” the footage to Houston?
Do you know what a modern TV news truck looks like? And you are saying this type of broadcast equipment was on the moon, strapped to the Lunar Rover Dune Buggy?
With 1970’s battery technology? On the moon? In a near vacuum, which would certainly explode or superheat the enormous batteries needed to broadcast live color footage half a million miles and back?
What was powering the TV UPLINK broadcasting transmitter?
What types of batteries were powering the TV downlink broadcasting receiver, in order to “remote control” the zoom and tilt on the camera lens... in real time?
You got nothing.
You have explained NOTHING.
But here is the video (with live audio!) from the “moon” in Apollo 17 for you to explain it all for us:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs
And here is the famous Musk convertible in "space" video glitch (you know what a glitch is in terms of video, right?) for you to explain for us. 
Let's start with another question: do you believe that there have been no actual people conspiring together for joint effort on something?
Do you remember Journolist and Sarah Palin/Breitbart? Are you saying that you do not believe there are actual "conspiracies" in the modern world?
Or is this just rehashed, boring old tropes in order to put me down, name-calling as if we're on a grammar school playground?
If you want to be a big boy, then show some intellectual guts, and answer my questions from previous posts to you.
Half a million miles for a “live” television broadcast from the “moon” which required a relay from Australia to Houston and then back again to “remote control” an analog color video camera (with year 1970 battery technology) in time to zoom and track with the fake lunar module lifting off from the film set of the “moon” in 1.5 seconds?
Nope. There were no international microwave transmissions allowing for a 1.5 second remote controlled camera on the moon to be operated by someone in Houston Texas for "live broadcast" on Apollo 17.
And this 1.5 seconds includes how the Australian tracking station converted the live video footage to broadcast quality before it “relayed” the footage to Houston?
Do you know what a modern TV news truck looks like? And you are saying this type of broadcast equipment was on the moon, strapped to the Lunar Rover Dune Buggy?
With 1970’s battery technology? On the moon? In a near vacuum, which would certainly explode or superheat the enormous batteries needed to broadcast live color footage half a million miles and back?
What was powering the TV UPLINK broadcasting transmitter?
What types of batteries were powering the TV downlink broadcasting receiver, in order to “remote control” the zoom and tilt on the camera lens... in real time?
You got nothing.
You have explained NOTHING.
But here is the video (with live audio!) from the “moon” in Apollo 17 for you to explain it all for us:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs
And here is the famous Musk convertible in "space" video glitch (you know what a glitch is in terms of video, right?) for you to explain for us.
Please explain it all for us... NASA's fake earth images, 1.5 seconds for Houston to remote control the camera left on the moon for the Apollo 17 footage... the curve math of the earth... the fake Felix Baumgartner footage, the fake Musk convertible in "space" footage... the faked clouds on NASA's earth images... please explain it all for us.
Oh, and don't forget to explain how we went to the "moon" and through the Van Allen belts in the 60s but now... ooops... we can't get through them to go back to the moon?
Self contained Infrared and radar tracking of objects in air -to-air missiles like the stinger missile has existed since the mid 1950’s. Using both infrared and radar a simple circuit that controls 2 motors could easily track and focus a camera of 1970 (NASA invented) vintage easily using infrared and radar. Similar circuitry is in the nose of a stinger.
Radar tracking anti aircraft artillery existed towards the end of WW II. Proximity fuses were invented at the Johns Hopkins applied physics labs during WW II.
Line of site micro wave towers from AT&T have existed since the 50’s
I could go on if you like.
I worked with satellite images for 11 years at NWS from numerous satellites in multiple wavelengths from the electromagnetic spectrum and multiple orbits. Some images were taken in the visible light spectrum. According to you I was working on scientific frauds and fakes. Well it payed extremely well because few people have taken, passed and understood the math required. I was on site when satellites failed and I got to look at and watch the launch of one.
I built a cloud computing environment prototype for the GOES-R satellite before I retired.
I'm familiar with AAA tracking. What has infrared/radar to do with live video stream broadcasting/downlinking transmissions on the "moon"?
And what has radar tracking to do with Video Transmitting equipment left behind on the moon and strapped to the Lunar Rover (Golf Cart?)
You understand this Apollo 17 footage was reputedly taken from the "Lunar Rover" left behind on the "moon"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs
And how was all that live analog color video broadcasting from the moon powered? With a round trip time from earth and back in 1.5 seconds?
I mean what type of battery technology c. 1969 was powering up a live broadcasting UPLINK (and tracking downlink receiver?)
We did not have the battery tech to do that back then.
We barely have it now. 
And what type of battery technology was powering all this broadcasting by remote control video cameras and equipment?
Don't forget these were not camcorders... NASA says they transmitted the video signal to huge tracking stations who recorded the images on video reels. No VHS yet, only 3/4" tape.
Where is the battery power for this TV UPLINK broadcasting station on the Lunar Rover?
And finally, since you say you've worked with satellites, can you please provide a live video stream from the earth to just one of the thousands upon thousands of satellites orbiting the earth? I mean, it's space junk. But we never see it...
Can you give us a photo of a satellite from the earth? I mean a real photo, like one you'd take yourself with a Nikon.
Thanks.
“since you say you’ve worked with satellites, can you please provide a live video stream from the earth to just one of the thousands upon thousands of satellites orbiting the earth? I mean, it’s space junk. But we never see it...
Can you give us a photo of a satellite from the earth? I mean a real photo, like one you’d take yourself with a Nikon.”
This web sight will tell you when the next time the international space station (ISS) will traverse your part of the planets night sky and other satellites as well.
It will also track the planets and stars with math that took humanity using God given (breathed life into ) gifts and talents of mathematics and reason centuries to figure out. Isaiah 42:5
Math, Science and a Diety (God) are not incompatible.
Please start your readings here my friend.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_Wager
The ISS is big enough to clearly see with a good pair of binoculars. I’ll ask one of my former co-workers to ask an astronaut to wave as they pass overhead so you know it’s real and not all an act. She’ll be heading up there in a few weeks if our relations with the Russians don’t completely break down. All joking aside about waving, you can clearly see the ISS with a good pair of binoculars in reasonable enough detail to remove your doubts. Who you gonna beleive, some photshopped photo from the internet or your own eyes. You do beleive in Galileo’s optics. If not we’re done here.
“Line of sight radio or microwave towers over the ocean in 1969... specifically from Australia to Texas in half a second or less?”
You’ve heard of ships and islands I assume. I won’t discuss P3 Orion comms because I’d have to kill you afterwards. See civilian operators. I’ve had a tour of NOAA’s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_P-3_Orion#Civilian_operators
Microwaves travel at 3 x 10^8 m/s. Assuming a circumference of 24900 miles, a microwave signal can theoretically travel around the entire planet in 0.125 seconds. That’s 12 and one half one hundredths of a second for those of you from Rio Linda.
So moon to Australia and all the way around the world twice could occur in less than 1.5 seconds. That would include every television on the planet soon there after using AT&T’s microwave infrastructure. The command from texas to the moon through Australia to get the whole process started would start 1.325 seconds before time 0 or ignition. The rest of the process is automatic as far as texas is concerned.
My son works with people who calculate the lead time necessary to send commands in very long wave frequencies to a satellite that is now well beyond Pluto to insure that events occur when necessary. They even re-installed the operating system and rebooted the on-board computers from greater than 8.2 billion Kilometers away. ( it’s not windows!) He’s smarter than me, much smarter. My wife is to but don’t tell her I said that. I’d never hear the end of it.
“What has infrared/radar to do with live video stream broadcasting/downlinking transmissions on the “moon”?”
It involves the automatics tracking and focus of the camera thus eliminating the need for two way down and uplink in real time making FM signals for audio and video at 3 x 10^8 M/s through 284000 kilometers of space in less than 1.2 seconds possible.
I assume you also believe then that we didn’t have batteries to run the rover either, Duh. I assume that you also know that electricity can be produced chemically in realtime, in a small package. It expensive, dangerous, explosive and hazardous but compared to the risk of going to the frickin moon itself it’s an acceptable risk. The resulting carcinogens we’re left on the moon. I hope that’s Ok with you.
Peace
On December 24, 1968, in what was the most watched television broadcast at the time, the crew of Apollo 8 read in turn from the Book of Genesis as they orbited the Moon. The Bible used was provided by the Gideons. Bill Anders, Jim Lovell, and Frank Borman recited Genesis chapter 1, verses 1 through 10 verbatim, using the King James Version text. Anders read verses 1–4, Lovell read verses 5–8, and Borman read verses 9–10, concluding the transmission.
William Anders
We are now approaching lunar sunrise, and for all the people back on Earth, the crew of Apollo 8 has a message that we would like to send to you.
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.[4]
James Lovell
And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.[4]
Frank Borman
And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called the Seas: and God saw that it was good.
And from the crew of Apollo 8, we close with good night, good luck, a Merry Christmas – and God bless all of you, all of you on the good Earth.
Don’t sound like a bunch of Godlessness to me. Obama godless probably. Allah will decide that one (LOL)
You think the axis tilt is 66.6 degrees? Wow, you lying bastard.
Your sort sometimes claim that people believe the earth is a globe because of NASA. Liar.
If not that, your sort claim that the Copernican model first introduced the idea that the earth was a globe. Liar.
When are you going to stop lying, liar?
So in plain language, that everyone can understand, this is what you are saying:
NASA says it used off the shelf cameras in “space” and on the “moon” but you are saying they had extremely sophisticated chemically-powered “batteries” that provided the energy for the Lunar Rover and all the other energy needs to power TV uplink and broadcasting from the camera that was left behind on the moon?
Still not buying it.
I'm not as interested in the ISS (interesting moniker btw) as just standard satellites, such as the ones you worked on.
Where are the videos of these satellites?
You know, all that “space junk”... we should be able to see it in the daytime, right?
Why wouldn't we be able to see this stuff in the daytime sky?
Are you saying we had a line of P3 Orion in the year 1970?
Wait, so you are saying that infrared signals were used to trigger a mechanical zoom on an off the shelf RCA analog color video camera that was powered by chemical batteries?
I'd really like to see some proof of this.
We did not have P3 Orions back in 1969-72.
But you are saying that there was a line of sight tower going from Australia
to an island
to a boat
to a plane
and back to another boat etc.,
and this is how the “Live” TV Broadcast From The “Moon”
was transmitted to Houston,
so Houston could then trigger an infrared transmission to mechanically zoom and tilt the camera lens on the "lunar surface" in on the Apollo 17 “moon” liftoff here? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs
I say "absolute B.S."
As for all that Bible recitation...
remember that "liars will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven" no matter how many times they publicly recite Bible verses.
Satan knows the Bible very well, too.
In the forty days in the desert, it took Jesus Himself to countermand Lucifer's tricky lying interpretations of the Word.
In fact, the way Christ put Satan's misinterpretations of the Bible to the test of the Truth is what we must do with NASA and all man-made claims that countermand His Word.
How come all of the “globe earth” numbers are nearly ALL 666? (The earth's axis = 23.4 degrees minus 90 degrees = 66.6 degrees)
Prove the “curve math” with any airplane ride anyone has EVER taken!
Prove that NASA had the year 1970 BATTERY POWER to Power a Television Transceiver left behind on the moon that was small enough to strap to a Lunar Dune Buggy....LOL!
You can't.
You can't even conceive that there is a Satanic force that is EXACTLY what Jesus warned us about... and uses the number 666 to describe everything from the earth's axis to the math curvature to the “speed” at which the earth “orbits” the sun ...
Grow up. Do the research. You've been deceived. It's not a sin to be deceived. It's a sin to not take Jesus seriously and ask yourself if you have been deceived... because He has warned us so sternly about this...
--
I understand that retards get in no matter what!
Finally! That's what I've been trying to tell ya.
The math just doesn't add up... even if it's only 500,000 miles round trip from the moon and back...
NASA did not have the battery power or technology to "remote control" the zoom lens on this Apollo footage from earth...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs
LOL Sad and horrible LOL
I didn't realize you didn't answer any of my questions, Mr. “I-Worked-On-Satellites-But-I-Can't-Show-You A-Live-Video-Feed-Of-One-Or-Of-Any-Of-The-Space-Junk-Supposedly-Orbitting-The-Earth-Nor-Can-I-Refute-Sontagged's-Logistics-Regarding-NASA-Trickery-So-I-Threw-Around-A-Lot-Of “high tech”-Sounding-Jargon-Including-An-Idiotic-Reference-To-P3 Orions-Because-Sontagged-Also-Caught-Me-On-The -”Chemical Batteries On The Moon”-Lie-So-All-I-Can-Do-Now-Is-Stoop-To-Name-Calling-On-FR-Because...Because...Because...Sontagged-Is-A-'Retard’”...
P3 Orions in 1970?
Chemical battery power on the moon in 1970?
Microwave relays over random boat/island/planes (P3 Orions) to relay the lunar video transmission from Australia to Texas in 3/4ths of a second in the year 1970?
Infrared telemetry “remote control” of the zoom lens on the camera left on the moon from Texas in less than a second?
OMG. That's bat s**t cray cray.
And, of course, no one can answer why NASA writes the word "SEX" in their fake clouds on their faked earth images. No one can answer it because it is insane.
Tell NASA they need to fire you from your job as a FR troll.
Now.
1959
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_P-3_Orion
I Watched them fly out of the Patuxent Naval Air Station in 1965 every weekend for years.
THE COMS are not bi-directional nor remote. Neither is the tracking of the LEM as it launches from the moon. It’s tracked just like an air to air missile. From the radar in the nose cone of the missile which was first done buy the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics lab in 1944 with proximity fuses.
Radar and infrared tracking started in
1946
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-4_Falcon
As far as Comms. go, the first cable was laid across the Atlantic in 1858. I think they probable laid a few more before 1969 along with a few other technical innovations in the following century.
Very few things were Commercial Off the Shelf at NASA. Most were custom built.
They had the internet (arpanet) in 1969.
ARPANET was the network that became the basis for the Internet. Based on a concept first published in 1967, ARPANET was developed under the direction of the U.S. Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). In 1969, the idea became a modest reality with the interconnection of four university computers.
My university computer systems, that I administered as a grad student were around the 100th and 101st computer on the internet.
You are either a troll or a retard.
My use of the word Retard meant that retards get a free pass into heaven. You are a shoe in.
What was your last math class? I bet it was with Jetro Boden and you was working on your Goes-in-toos. (gozintas)
Next thing you’ll tell me is that they didn’t have Apple tablets in the 1960’s ;)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H8e0MMwUec
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.