Replies

Interesting.

So in plain language, that everyone can understand, this is what you are saying:

NASA says it used off the shelf cameras in “space” and on the “moon” but you are saying they had extremely sophisticated chemically-powered “batteries” that provided the energy for the Lunar Rover and all the other energy needs to power TV uplink and broadcasting from the camera that was left behind on the moon?

Still not buying it.

I'm not as interested in the ISS (interesting moniker btw) as just standard satellites, such as the ones you worked on.

Where are the videos of these satellites?

You know, all that “space junk”... we should be able to see it in the daytime, right?

Why wouldn't we be able to see this stuff in the daytime sky?

Are you saying we had a line of P3 Orion in the year 1970?

Wait, so you are saying that infrared signals were used to trigger a mechanical zoom on an off the shelf RCA analog color video camera that was powered by chemical batteries?

I'd really like to see some proof of this.

We did not have P3 Orions back in 1969-72.

But you are saying that there was a line of sight tower going from Australia
to an island
to a boat
to a plane
and back to another boat etc.,
and this is how the “Live” TV Broadcast From The “Moon”
was transmitted to Houston,
so Houston could then trigger an infrared transmission to mechanically zoom and tilt the camera lens on the "lunar surface" in on the Apollo 17 “moon” liftoff here? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs

I say "absolute B.S."

As for all that Bible recitation...

remember that "liars will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven" no matter how many times they publicly recite Bible verses.

Satan knows the Bible very well, too.

In the forty days in the desert, it took Jesus Himself to countermand Lucifer's tricky lying interpretations of the Word.

In fact, the way Christ put Satan's misinterpretations of the Bible to the test of the Truth is what we must do with NASA and all man-made claims that countermand His Word.