Replies

You know, guy, every time you post something you look more stupid. You already exposed yourself on the boner about a billion vs. a million. And your stupid comment earlier about the televised first step on Apollo 11 shows you to be even more stupid. You know nothing of what you're trying to denigrate. You know nothing of the LM design or the contents of the MESA. You know nothing of how wideband FM was used in the MSFN systems to transmit the TV images.

We all know your game. Its the same as conspiracy nuts everywhere. You bring up a bogus conspiracy, we obliterate it with facts and logic, and your response is then, oh, that's just more NASA lies. Don't you see how stupid that makes you look? And that is why I won't any time debunking your bogus "evidence" that has been rehashed and debunked time and time again. You're just doing a Gish Gallup, only using nonsense and gibberish instead of rationale thought. I don't have time for that. When you're my age, you become acutely aware that life is short, and I can't waste any more of it on debunking old-hat conspiracy theory posts from someone who is darn near certifiable. You call it cowardice, but in fact it is the wisest course, since debating a fool only makes one look like a fool.

You're probably childish enough to think that if you have the last word then you "won". Well, hey, knock yourself out. You can have the last word, because I'm done.

Why do you think I'm a guy btw?

Let's start with another question: do you believe that there have been no actual people conspiring together for joint effort on something?

Do you remember Journolist and Sarah Palin/Breitbart? Are you saying that you do not believe there are actual "conspiracies" in the modern world?

Or is this just rehashed, boring old tropes in order to put me down, name-calling as if we're on a grammar school playground?

If you want to be a big boy, then show some intellectual guts, and answer my questions from previous posts to you.

Half a million miles for a “live” television broadcast from the “moon” which required a relay from Australia to Houston and then back again to “remote control” an analog color video camera (with year 1970 battery technology) in time to zoom and track with the fake lunar module lifting off from the film set of the “moon” in 1.5 seconds?

Nope. There were no international microwave transmissions allowing for a 1.5 second remote controlled camera on the moon to be operated by someone in Houston Texas for "live broadcast" on Apollo 17.

And this 1.5 seconds includes how the Australian tracking station converted the live video footage to broadcast quality before it “relayed” the footage to Houston?

Do you know what a modern TV news truck looks like? And you are saying this type of broadcast equipment was on the moon, strapped to the Lunar Rover Dune Buggy?

With 1970’s battery technology? On the moon? In a near vacuum, which would certainly explode or superheat the enormous batteries needed to broadcast live color footage half a million miles and back?

What was powering the TV UPLINK broadcasting transmitter?

What types of batteries were powering the TV downlink broadcasting receiver, in order to “remote control” the zoom and tilt on the camera lens... in real time?

You got nothing.

You have explained NOTHING.

But here is the video (with live audio!) from the “moon” in Apollo 17 for you to explain it all for us:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs

And here is the famous Musk convertible in "space" video glitch (you know what a glitch is in terms of video, right?) for you to explain for us.