We’ve discussed the brackets before. They are ALWAYS a “kill” box but likely represent the target being boxed-in, held back or sequestered.
Team Q was sequestered [17] prior to “The calm before the storm.” statement in October.
Story lines also help (future proves the past).
A few months ago, [[[RR]]] was boxed-in 3 ways; resign, be fired or get impeached. Articles of impeachment were prepared then congress started talking obstruction regarding the other 2.
RR weaseled out of the brackets but Q-team put him right back into at least 1 set of brackets (fired by Whitaker?) (resign?) where he remains today.
ooops...AREN’T... ALWAYS
Cletus said:
We’ve discussed the brackets before. They are ALWAYS a “kill” box but likely represent the target being boxed-in, held back or sequestered.
Texokie replied:
I have read your recent comments about the brackets with great interest.... but I don’t recall participating in or reading a discussion where I saw the reasoning which was convincing to me that the kill boxes are “ALWAYS” representing a target being boxed-in, held back, or sequestered. It is entirely possible that I missed such a discussion, because of various periods of computer or local server issues that have caused me to miss following some threads several times over this past year.
It makes sense that the kill boxes would at least MOSTLY indicate a bound condition, but even if I concede for the sake of argument that it is “ALWAYS” true, I am not seeing how that negates the possibility of sub messages being conveyed with the brackets along with the bracketed items conveying the “bound” concept. Because from my perspective, I believe I’m seeing them! But who knows.....I’m willing to entertain the idea that maybe I’m not.
After all, there is a very beloved Jimmy Stewart movie in which the character he played, Elwood P. Dowd, had no doubt at all that he was seeing a giant bunny named Harvey.
I guess we’ll find out at the end of the movie if I’m a bunny see-er or not! LOL!