Skip to comments.
White House Suspending Jim Acosta Again
Sara Carter ^
| November 19, 2018 | 11:19 AM EST
| Sara Carter
Posted on 11/19/2018 2:19:11 PM PST by Texas Fossil
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
"Acosta’s attorneys objected to the White House letter, claiming it was “an attempt to provide retroactive due process” in court filings on Monday."
Now, we are back on track.
To: Texas Fossil
Old news.
He was reinstated. Democrat crybaby.
2
posted on
11/19/2018 2:20:28 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Texas Fossil
I don’t get all this “due process” crap. He’s not on trial!
To: Texas Fossil
This decision reflects top rate judgment on the part of President Trump.
4
posted on
11/19/2018 2:22:09 PM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
To: Texas Fossil
5
posted on
11/19/2018 2:23:38 PM PST
by
be-baw
(still seeking...)
To: Texas Fossil
I wish Trump would stop bowing to the courts. They had no jurisdiction over this anyway.
6
posted on
11/19/2018 2:25:35 PM PST
by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
To: Artemis Webb
I was at the White House a few months ago. If I had misbehaved I am sure that I would have been removed immediately, and with prejudice. None of this “due process” crap.
I suppose the next whacko who goes over the fence is now entitled to due process?
To: reasonisfaith
“Top rate judgment” on the part of President Trump wold be to ignore the petulant Federal judge who thinks he has the authority to issue orders to the President of the United States.
8
posted on
11/19/2018 2:26:23 PM PST
by
MeganC
(There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Texas Fossil
Nothing in the order said he had to be admitted TO the press room...only that his pass had to be reinstated.
10
posted on
11/19/2018 2:28:13 PM PST
by
ealgeone
(SCRIPTURE DOES NOT CHANGE!)
To: Texas Fossil
New rules from Sarah Saunders:
11
posted on
11/19/2018 2:30:32 PM PST
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: ealgeone
The judge was very clear and wise.
Here's your press pass....but the President NEVER has to call on you.
Psssst...Jim....You lost!!
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Windflier
I wish Trump would stop bowing to the courts. They had no jurisdiction over this anyway. Wondering why Trump puts up with this court shi!. Time to tell the Federal Court to go to hell.
To: RightGeek
They should have added no running in the halls and
no chewing gum.
15
posted on
11/19/2018 2:35:57 PM PST
by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west))
To: eyedigress
Speaking of chewing gum, I've been in courtrooms where that act will get you booted immediately by the baliff.
No "due process" there.
16
posted on
11/19/2018 2:38:23 PM PST
by
truthkeeper
(All Trump Has Going for Him is the Votes)
To: Logical me
So the White House has to codify “rules” that a particular reporter claimed to not understand, even though everyone in the room the behavior was rude beyond belief?
That is one of the problems.
DK
To: Artemis Webb
To: MeganC
You mean when Trump refused to give in?
When he sent the letter basically telling Acosta his stupid little press pass is as worthless as a copy of the communist manifesto?
19
posted on
11/19/2018 2:39:39 PM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
To: Texas Fossil
20
posted on
11/19/2018 2:39:41 PM PST
by
COUNTrecount
(If only Harvey Weinstein's bathrobe could talk.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
