1 posted on
11/14/2018 10:38:38 AM PST by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
A place to exile all the criminal Donk election officials from Broward and Palm Beach counties, Florida
2 posted on
11/14/2018 10:40:47 AM PST by
BigEdLB
(BigEdLB, Russian BOT, At your service)
To: BenLurkin
The red dwarf star itself emits only about 0.4% of our sun’s radiance, so the planet receives about 2% of the intensity that Earth receives from its sun. This is because Barnard’s star is in the class of M dwarf stars, cooler and less massive than our sun. It’s also an old star that predates our own solar system.
...
And it will still be shining long after the Sun is burned out.
Red dwarfs stay in their main sequence for trillions of years.
4 posted on
11/14/2018 10:47:38 AM PST by
Moonman62
(Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
To: BenLurkin
Dethaw ideas?
- Needs a moon(s) for tidal movement and additional light.
5 posted on
11/14/2018 10:47:44 AM PST by
DannyTN
To: BenLurkin
I've read the book.
To: BenLurkin
Is it a great place for Winter Sports ,you know with all our Global Warming
To: BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Are the Erf-like Planet’s Dinosaurs frozen too?
12 posted on
11/14/2018 11:13:26 AM PST by
Paladin2
To: BenLurkin
Should name the planet Ultima Thule and check out if Brian Blessed is hanging out there. [Space 1999 Reference]
13 posted on
11/14/2018 11:17:39 AM PST by
C19fan
To: BenLurkin
ahh, so if the envirowhackos are right and we end up destroying this one, we can just take another out to thaw...
To: SunkenCiv
16 posted on
11/14/2018 11:29:33 AM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
("It's Slappin' Time !")
To: BenLurkin
The red dwarf star itself emits only about 0.4% of our sun's radiance, so the planet receives about 2% of the intensity that Earth receives from its sun.
Did CNN actually stumble on a "global warming" factoid there with regard to solar activity. They won't even realize it. The volume of koolaid they've consumed blinds them to it.
17 posted on
11/14/2018 11:34:07 AM PST by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: BenLurkin
Lemme know when the scientists get a short signal indicating the numbers —> 3.1415 etc etc etc
That’ll be the DAY !!!
18 posted on
11/14/2018 11:39:53 AM PST by
litehaus
(A memory toooo long.............)
To: BenLurkin
It’s not an Earth, and it’s not a Super-Earth either. And forget about going there. In other words, why this article?
20 posted on
11/14/2018 12:57:46 PM PST by
I want the USA back
(It's Ok To Be White. White Lives Matter. White Guilt is Socially Constructed)
To: BenLurkin
Who needs to go six light years?
I just have to look out the kitchen window.
24 posted on
11/14/2018 1:23:44 PM PST by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith......)
To: BenLurkin
hey algore:
See what happens when you mess around with global warming?
Now, send back those $100’s millions you filched.
...and the Nobel prize too while you’re at it.
25 posted on
11/14/2018 1:42:39 PM PST by
Oscar in Batangas
(12:01 PM 1/20/2017...The end of an error.)
To: BenLurkin
Darn. My ancestor relatives used to live on that dying planet. I told them that global cooling will kill them off.
26 posted on
11/14/2018 3:47:29 PM PST by
TheNext
(Best Post Award does not hand out Participation Award trophies)
To: BenLurkin
There is NOTHING in the data presented that warrants the title of the article referring to the planet as a “Frozen ‘Super Earth’ “.
One mere point of data, that of a planet being in a zone, relative to the distance from a solar system’s star, which hints that water - if it is even present - would be frozen on a that planet, is NOT justification to even call the planet “Earth like” much less a “Frozen Super Earth”.
Being truly Earth like requires numerous points of data, not one, and not even a handful; but many.
These titles only prove how UNSCIENTIFIC are so many so-called “science” publications.
28 posted on
11/14/2018 4:27:45 PM PST by
Wuli
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson