Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/31/2018 1:35:53 PM PDT by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mikelets456

His kids are US Citizens. He was in the US legally (had been given a Green Card) hence he was “under the jurisdiction of the United States”.


2 posted on 10/31/2018 1:37:55 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456
While the authors of the 14th Amendment explicitly excluded “foreigners” the status of legal immigrants applying for citizenship is ambiguous. We didn’t have the categories of “legal and illegal” immigrants in 1866 but we did have a process for becoming a citizen, and I would surmise that such duly enrolled immigrants would be covered under the 14th clause.

Regarding the “birthright” of illegals, I hope Trump or Congress or both pursue the issue. A court ruling would be a good thing to have on the record.

3 posted on 10/31/2018 1:41:07 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard (Power is more often surrendered than seized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456

Can I stir the pot and ask a question which may seem odd?

How exactly do we define citizenship? The vast majority of Americans do not have a passport. So for most, the evidence of citizenship would be a birth certificate.

Naturalized citizens have documentation of their naturalization. But most of us don’t have any documentation of being American except the birth certificate.

And for passport holders, in my case I recall the key document to get a passport was the birth certificate.


7 posted on 10/31/2018 1:59:22 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456; All
"While he was waiting for his citizenship he had 3 children."

Noting that I’m not a citizenship judge, Sen. Jacob Howard, the author of the jurisdiction clause, had noted that citizens pay taxes. So did your friend file federal tax returns while he had the three children?

8 posted on 10/31/2018 2:01:57 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456

Of course they are——my mother hadn’t yet become a citizen when my brother and I were born.

,


9 posted on 10/31/2018 2:05:35 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456

>>>My co-worker argues that his kids are not citizens and Trump’s EO and the 14th amendment would kick them out<<<

POTUS Trump’s EO would and could not be Retroactive, unlike FDR’s EO that imprisoned American Citizens of Japanese Descent.


11 posted on 10/31/2018 2:09:56 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456
I agree with your analysis here. Trump's effort is aimed at stopping children of illegals from automatically being citizens, but your friend was here legally.
12 posted on 10/31/2018 2:10:46 PM PDT by libertylover (2016 was a mini-revolution. Keep it going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456

The 14th was never intended to apply to foreigners.
Any foreigners.
The Supreme Court stretched it to cover the children of foreigners here legally in Wong Kim Ark, but did not extend it to illegal aliens.
That was done administratively sometime in the 1960’s.
An executive order can remedy that.

Children of foreign nationals inherit the nationality(ies) of their foreign national parent(s).

That’s why the children of foreign nationals are NOT natural born citizens.

That’s also how Ted Cruz acquired US citizenship being born in Canada. A citizen by extension of his mother’s citizenship, but not a natural born citizen.


13 posted on 10/31/2018 2:12:48 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456

What was the mother’s status?


14 posted on 10/31/2018 2:13:35 PM PDT by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456

Your Canuck friend is a liberal Democrat, and his argument is solely for the purpose of inflammation. I say take two Tylenol long lasting and tell him to shove off. His kids are native, but not natural born citizens...


19 posted on 10/31/2018 2:25:07 PM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456

He couldn’t possibly have kids all by himself. What is the citizenship status of his wife or girlfriend or surrogate?


20 posted on 10/31/2018 2:26:54 PM PDT by gspurlock (http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456

21 posted on 10/31/2018 2:34:00 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your teaching is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456

It’s my understanding that as long as the children are under a certain age, not sure what age, they also receive citizenship. Adult children would have to apply for their own citizenship.


25 posted on 10/31/2018 2:57:23 PM PDT by This I Wonder32460 (Stay Calm & MAGA On!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456

Legal residents’ children born here can have birthright. If they weren’t born here, maybe they should have a path to citizenship once the parent is a citizen.


28 posted on 10/31/2018 3:04:52 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456

And student visas must be separate status. If you are only here on a student visa, your kids should not get anything and maybe you should all be deported. If you come here to study, don’t get knocked up. It’s a loophole and student visas are so easy to get.

Birthright should only be for children of citizens and legal residents, not work exchange or student.


29 posted on 10/31/2018 3:07:32 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456; gspurlock; sanjuanbob

Mikelets456,

What citizenship did their mom have?


31 posted on 10/31/2018 3:26:27 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mikelets456

Since he is naturalized, the way it used to be was, his kids will be given a choice when they are 18 if they want their original Canadian citizenship or choose American citizenship (or the latest fad, both). They will not be ‘kicked out’ because they are legally under the custody of a now-naturalized American citizen. If, at 18, those children refuse American citizenship and claim Canadian citizenship instead, then different rules would apply to them once they did that, vis a vis work permits, voting, taxes, etc. Not sure how all the taxes, work permits etc stuff works for dual citizens.


33 posted on 10/31/2018 4:29:38 PM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson