Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: iowamark
Taney gets a bad rap for Dred Scott. It was properly decided on Constitutional grounds. Do-gooders just didn't like the logical conclusion. Then, as now, there were people who didn't like the Constitution but they couldn't convince sufficient numbers of people to change it legally.

ML/NJ

26 posted on 10/21/2018 6:21:41 AM PDT by ml/nj (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj; x; rockrr; Bull Snipe
ml/nj: "Taney gets a bad rap for Dred Scott.
It was properly decided on Constitutional grounds.
Do-gooders just didn't like the logical conclusion. "

Nooooooo, Crazy Roger's "logic" was complete nonsense, and you should be ashamed for suggesting otherwise, FRiend.

The fact is you cannot find a single quote from any Founder which sounds like the "logic" of Crazy Rober's Dred Scott ruling.
That's because our Founders -- even slaveholders like Washington, Jefferson & Madison -- all considered slavery a moral wrong which should be, eventually, abolished.
They all believed that Congress had full authority to abolish slavery in US territories, and had no problems with some states treating freed-slaves as full voting citizens.

So where in hades does this notion come from that Crazy Roger was anything other than stark raving mad??

Democrats but buddies, Taney & Buchanan:


31 posted on 10/21/2018 10:14:51 AM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson