Posted on 10/13/2018 7:34:12 AM PDT by BenLurkin
Actually I don’t remember. I was driving a six by with
a load of shit cans to be emptied into the “lake of shit”.
You would have to have seen it to believe it.
I’ve had some good friends and was stationed with folks that went to Vietnam and heard some real doozy type stories...I guess some of the events helped relieve some tensions from time to time...
>We are heading down a disturbing path. I understand the >usefulness of a device such as this to deal with violent >rioters etc., but the types of weapons that are being >created (not just by us, obviously) are diminishing our >ability to protect ourselves from aggressors, and to >preserve our liberty against would-be oppressors.
True. They should just call in the scoops
I’m saying: fire that baby up down on the southern border in multiple iterations.
Sound Canon.
Man, you could have fun with that at the game.
Even after 50 years, I sometimes dream that I’m
asleep on a sandy cot in a bunker having a dream
about my future, because I woke up on a sandy cot
in a bunker after dreaming about the future.
I know, she said.
I know, he said.
Together they said, WE KNOW!
And I said, Don’t tell me,
I’m not here, I’m in Vietnam Baby!
A long time ago in a land far away.
The dragon ate the prince and princess...
and lived happily ever after.
That sounds like the best option to me.
No need to hurt someone by burning their flesh off. That's horrible.
Did it happen in this jurisdiction? Sorry, not "precedent" as far as this court is concerned.
Is this case almost exactly like something that happened before? No? Sorry, that precedent is not "on point", i.e., does not help your case.
For example, should a police officer know that you shouldn't drive 100 MPH for miles to chase a guy for a "minor traffic violation"? Even though the officer pled guilty to vehicular homicide, "it was not clearly established at the time of the crash that Officer Homanko’s conduct ... could give rise to constitutional liability." Too bad your bystander wife is dead from his "criminally reckless driving." Look on the bright side though -- you've established a precedent that would apply for somebody else's dead wife next time. Maybe.
There are good articles from Fifth Circuit Judge Don Willett, for one (I think he's on Trump's short list for the Supreme Court) discussing the abuse of "qualified immunity" here. From the first link there:
"To some observers, qualified immunity smacks of unqualified impunity, letting public officials duck consequences for bad behavior — no matter how palpably unreasonable — as long as they were the first to behave badly. Merely proving a constitutional deprivation doesn't cut it; plaintiffs must cite functionally identical precedent that places the legal question "beyond debate" to "every" reasonable officer. Put differently, it's immaterial that someone acts unconstitutionally if no prior case held such misconduct unlawful."
I don’t buy the Marines buying a weapon system that doesn’t lead directly to a higher body count.
They would not be able to stand up...Frac gel is very slick.
And bio degradable
Are you involved in non-lethal weapons or weapons development for the military? If not what you are saying though true has very little to do with the process, the doctrine and policy for using such things. It is a whole new area that is about to become hot because the use for these things in the US in unprecedented.
Sound,
Water or Stink
I like the “Scoops” on
SOYLENT GREEN!
What a continued disgrace...Pussification of the Corps continues unabated...
There you go!
Yeah, at what used to be a WallyWorld and People thought supplies would be available there do the herds of sheeples stampede on over only to find a Chainlink Fence posing as a Security fence when they arrive they go right in voluntarily and then find the gates are one way. Next they find that ANY METAL in possession AND the Chainlink fence metal get way hotter than skin does from The Crowd Control Microwave Machine.
This kinda shit needs to be kept FAR AWAY FROM The America haters demonratcommies like hitlary/zer0/holder and ILK LIKE THEM for obvious reasons.
their kind would have no qualms about using this type of Weapon already on the “LEAVE A PILE OF DUST OR SMOLDERING GOO” Setting.
Crow somewhere else. I’m speaking of the legalities.
The legalities are very much tied to the development dupek. Your response proves that you obviously do not know what you are talking about concerning weapons policy and treaties.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.