[MileHi]

Sure you can. Why is 1—>4—>5 not correct?

[philman_36]

I'm not even going to bother with you.
Scoff if you choose.

[SERKIT]

Because it equals 10....not the lowest number for the best path.

[Swordmaker]

Sure you can. Why is 1—>4—>5 not correct?

Because the numbers near each arrow represented distances or perhaps stops, and the chart was neither a true scale, nor a representational map, but rather an informational flow chart.

The 1 to 4 to 5 is ten units travel long, while. the other was only 8 units travel and was the therefore the shortest distance.

[generally]

The "tricky" part of the path is from A to B, where you can choose the top line (2) instead of the center line (4).

The lines with arrows are not drawn to scale. You have to look at the number next to the line to see how "long" it is.

So going from S to A, you can choose a path that is 3, 1, or 5 units long. Choose 1 (the "straight" line in the center)

From A to B, the choices are 2,4,6. Choose 2. (the top)

From B to T, the choices are 7, 5. Choose 5. (the bottom/straight line)

So 1 + 2 + 5 + 8.

That said, I'm not sure what all this has to do with anything. Is the Fibonacci sequence some occult thing? Is Fibonacci coding some occult thing? I have no background in the occult, so any symbolism is lost on me (aside from a few things that FReeQs have researched and educated us on).