p>Welcome to our Q thread.
It's impossible to learn about Trump's successes and
strategy by following the MSM. If you are interested
in learning more about 'Q' and what's really going on in our government,
please click the links at the top of the table above
to review articles and videos which describe who/what
Q is about.
Much preparation has gone into the strategy now
unfolding in D.C. The groundwork has been laid and the path
to justice is almost cleared of barriers. MAGA!
Our prior Q thread is here:
Q Anon: 09/26/18 Trust Trump's Plan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: ransomnote; bagster
This political cartoon was a fixer upper, but the renovations make it look great!
293 posted on
09/30/2018 2:59:08 PM PDT by
GraceG
("If I post an AWESOME MEME, STEAL IT! JUST RE-POST IT IN TWO PLACES PLEASE")
To: ransomnote
I just came across this and thought that it is very interesting, dated Sept 23, 2018.
EMERGENCY REPORT: Signed Executive Orders reveal Trump is planning mass arrests, military tribunals for deep state traitors like Comey, Clinton and Obama UPDATE
Sunday, September 23, 2018 by: Mike Adams
Tags: barack obama, Collusion, deep state, executive orders, freedom, James Comey, Liberty, martial law, military tribunals, national emergency, President Trump, traitors, treason, White House
https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-09-23-emergency-report-signed-executive-orders-reveal-trump-is-planning-mass-arrests-military-tribunals-for-deep-state-traitors-like-comey-clinton-and-obama.html
387 posted on
09/30/2018 5:18:52 PM PDT by
matthew fuller
(The left loves islam because they both hate the USA. Remember 91101 and 91112.)
To: ransomnote; TEXOKIE; bagster; Wneighbor; little jeremiah; txhurl; Aquamarine
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/breaking-sex-crimes-prosecutor-rachel-mitchell-completely-exonerates-judge-kavanaugh-in-new-report/
Sex Crimes Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell COMPLETELY EXONERATES Judge Kavanaugh in NEW REPORT!
After a careful review of all of the evidence put fourth by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford in her accusations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell has released a report which completely exonerates the judge.
It appears that Rachel Mitchell finds Ford’s allegations totally suspect, potentially fraudulent pic.twitter.com/3dJkIGPxri
Jacob Wohl (@JacobAWohl) October 1, 2018
Sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell, a non-partisan third-party with more than 25 years experience prosecuting sex crimes in the state of Arizona, carefully reviewed the allegations made by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, including hours of testimony, and has released a report on the matter. In the report, Mitchell points out more than a dozen glaring inconsistencies in Dr. Fords account and paints the accusations as potentially fraudulent.
Mitchells points out several points, including:
Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of when the alleged assault happened.
Dr. Ford struggled to identify Judge Kavanaugh as the assailant by name.
When speaking with her husband, Dr. Ford changed her description of the incident to become less specific.
Dr. Ford has no memory of key details of the night in questiondetails that could help corroborate her account.
She does not remember in what house the alleged assault took place or where that house was located with any specificity.
Perhaps most importantly, she does not remember how she got from the party back to her house.
All in all, Rachel Mitchell reaches the conclusion that A he said, she said case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that.
548 posted on
09/30/2018 8:40:55 PM PDT by
mairdie
To: ransomnote
622 posted on
10/01/2018 1:12:28 AM PDT by
Randy Larsen
(Trump IS MY president and I'm damn proud of him!)
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote
This is the sort of anger I appreciate seeing come out of the Kavanaugh persecution. Long article well worth reading in full.
https://spectator.org/predictions-and-observations-on-how-the-coming-week-will-play-out-for-the-kavanaugh-confirmation/
Predictions and Observations on How the Coming Week Will Play Out for the Kavanaugh Confirmation
Dov Fischer
In the end, Democrat totalitarianism will be warded off and therell be only one Senate RINO left.
I begin by sharing forthrightly my abject disgust over everything I have seen play out since the President nominated Judge Brett Kavanaugh to succeed Justice Anthony Kennedy to the High Court.
...
I also am disgusted by the way thatsomeRepublicans have messed things. Let us note: thevast majorityof Senate Republicans are doing their job and are rock-solid on the Kavanaugh nomination. He has 48 of the 51 Republican Senators. That reality is not getting the attention it deserves from Republican conservatives. This is not Grassleys fault; he has done his job. Rather, this is about:
Jeff Flake from Arizona who is taking his last bow before hiring himself out as a cable news commentator. Thankfully, President Trump long ago elicited from Flake outbursts on the Senate floor that demonstrated that he is not the conservative Arizona Republican whom his voters initially thought that were electing, and that is why he is out in a month.
Susan Collins, who simply cannot disregard that she gets elected in Maine, not Alabama or Mississippi, and knows that Republicans are better off with her covering her bases now than by her posturing as an uncompromising conservative and losing races in Maine.
Lisa Murkowski, a RINO who does not have the legitimate excuse that Collins has, because Alaska is rock-ribbed conservative, but Murkowski is impossible.
Richard Mourdock, the Republican fool who blew the Senate race in Indiana six years ago, when Democrat Joe Donnelly was easy pickins, because he just had to opine on rape and abortion.
Todd Akin, the Republican fool who blew the Senate race in Missouri six years ago, when Democrat Claire McCaskill was easy pickins, because he also just had to opine on rape and abortion.
The debacle last year in Alabama that saw Jeff Sessionss safe Republican U.S. Senate seat lost, partly because of the Peter Principle disaster occasioned by elevating Sessions to Attorney-General beyond his level of excellence, and partly because the Republicans lost the seat to Doug Jones by running a candidate who got slimed by the Seedier Media and whose personal background left him exposed to such calumny.
Thus, Grassley is dealing well with a tough deck of cards. He has a committee of 11 Republicans and 10 Democrats, and he rightly has been headstrong on getting Judge Kavanaugh approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee. To do so, he had ten Republicans in favor, ten Resisters resisting, and Flake. So he cut a deal with Flake. He had no choice. So be it; that is how things get done in democracies. In return for agreeing to the pointless extra weeks FBI investigation the seventh time they are investigating Judge Kavanaugh Grassley got Flakes vote. Remember: The Republicans could not get a committee majority to send Clarence Thomass nomination to the floor for a vote, but Grassley engineered Kavanaughs committee approval.
Now it goes to the Senate floor. Mitch McConnell has been training for this moment all his life.
...
7. In past years, there were so many RINOs in the U.S. Senate on the Republican side of the aisle that no good conservative defense and counter-attack ever could be launched. It is telling that the Tea Party movement and the Trump Revolution now have so reoriented the Republican aisle in the Senate that only two true RINOs are left: Lisa Murkowski and Jeff Flake. (As Susan Collinss voting record on all critical issues demonstrates, she is not a RINO but a Republican who needs to accommodate a Maine electorate.) Flake is out in a few weeks. Murkowski is the only RINO left right now. The conservative movements rank and file have come a long way in changing the party.
692 posted on
10/01/2018 7:09:48 AM PDT by
mairdie
To: ransomnote
New Q
New: Title TBD
2305
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
2018-10-01T20:04:47.000Z
Anonymous
2018-10-01T19:50:02.000Z
>>3281997
Ford should down for perjury
..
>>3282114
Refused to hand over therapy notes to FBI.
Think WHY.
Justice K NEVER named.
[Mr X logged in book along w/ physical description during ‘eyes closed’ session = / = Justice K].
FBI no subpoena power [no GJ] to demand.
Justice K NEVER named / asked during Polygraph.
Something did happen to Dr. Ford in her past.
Use of that ‘something’ to ‘frame’ Justice K.
Dr. Ford’s family has strong ties to SWAMP.
FBI has expanded investigation into other suspicious acts w/ support of ABC agency as AUTH BY POTUS.
[RR] involved?
Q
895 posted on
10/01/2018 1:11:42 PM PDT by
mairdie
To: ransomnote
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/huge-christine-ford-published-2008-article-on-self-hypnosis-used-to-retrieve-and-create-artificial-situations/
HUGE! Christine Ford Published 2008 Article on Self-Hypnosis Used to Retrieve and “Create Artificial Situations”
Christine Ford has not turned over her therapists notes to the Senate regarding her suppressed memories about Judge Kavanaugh abusing her decades earlier.
This may be because if the memories were revealed through hypnosis they would be “absolutely inadmissible” in the court of law in many states, including New York and Maryland.
Deeply true. Two most unreliable, but often believed, forms of testimony: 1) confessions; 2) eye witness recollections. https://t.co/72Q2V6SzTm
Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) September 28, 2018
There were also accusations that Christine Ford was under a hypnotic trance during her testimony.
She was under a hypnotic trance. pic.twitter.com/N0BOrQb2Tl
KenWeaverII (@nostrilmandias) September 30, 2018
Now this
One of Christine Blasey Ford’s research articles in 2008 included a study on self-hypnosis.
The practice of self-hypnosis is used to retrieve important memories and “create artificial situations.”
Via Professor Margot Cleveland:
BREAKING: This is HUGE (waiting for permission to h/t): One of Christine Ford Blasey’s research articles in 2008 included a study in which participants were TAUGHT SELF-HYPNOSIS & noted hypnosis is used to retrieve important memories “AND CREATE ARTIFICAL SITUATIONS.” pic.twitter.com/11n1JVnArM
Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) October 1, 2018
919 posted on
10/01/2018 1:52:43 PM PDT by
mairdie
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote
So proud: someone red pilled my bro and he reads the Q stuff now. Not here, though.
1,063 posted on
10/01/2018 5:14:53 PM PDT by
madison10
(Pray for President Trump, Judge Kavanaugh and their families)
To: ransomnote
1,087 posted on
10/01/2018 5:51:12 PM PDT by
Darnright
(We live in interesting times.)
To: ransomnote
I just don’t GET Q. I wish I could, but I don’t.
1,258 posted on
10/01/2018 9:19:20 PM PDT by
luvie
(The bravery and dedication of our troops in keeping us safe & free make me proud to be an American!)
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote
An absolutely GREAT article. Too long to put all here, but WELL worth the reading.
https://amgreatness.com/2018/10/01/with-the-kavanaugh-fight-political-warfare-escalates/
With the Kavanaugh Fight, Political Warfare Escalates
Roger Kimball
Scorched earth. Thats the tactic the Democrats and their enablers in the media and George Soros-funded hit squads are employing against Brett Kavanaugh. We all know it. We all experienced that sharp intake of breath when it was first reported that Dianne Feinstein had a letter from some anonymous female accusing Kavanaugh of having engaged in sexual misconduct with her when he was in high school. Depending on your estimate of Judge Kavanaughs character, you focused either on sexual misconduct (Now weve got em matey!) or on high school (Really? Youre going after a guy with a sterling record because he may have hit on a girl at a party in high school?)
I belong firmly in the latter camp. But of course that was just the beginning of an extraordinary, and orchestrated (I want to emphasize that) effort to destroy a man of exceptional ability and exceptional integrity.
Eventually, we learned the name of his accuser: Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. Almost three weeks after she went public, we still dont know much about her. Before her accusation became public, she took great care to scrub her activities from social media and the internet. But have no fear. Even as I write, many people, outraged at her totally unsupported allegations, are piecing together a portrait of a rambunctious party girl who grew up to be an anti-Trump activist. I look forward to inspecting the portrait when it is finished.
Initially, the curious thing was how the lettersent, Feinstein insisted, in confidencewas leaked. I believe I am correct in saying that only three sets of people had it: Fords lawyers (why did she engage left-wing anti-Trump lawyers just before this became public? Who is paying for them?), her local congresswoman, and Senator Feinsteins office. I am glad that President Trump has asked the FBI to look into who leaked the letter. Id like to know.
At first, I inclined to the idea that this obviously damaged person (I say that after having sat through her artfully incoherent, wounded-little-girl testimony) was just collateral damage in the Democrats effort to destroy Donald Trumps nominee. She really did, I thought, want anonymity and was terrified at testifying before all those big meanies in the Senate.
...
The Republicans on the Judiciary Committee, brave souls that they are, declined even to question Dr. Ford (I love the Dr.) themselves. They thought that the optics of men asking questions of a women who has brought a career-ending accusation against someone nominated to the Supreme Court would seem meanisnt modern feminism wonderful?so they foisted the job off to a female prosecutor who was only allowed to pose her ever-so-gentle questions in five-minute increments.
Christine Ford did present a pathetic spectacle and, as I say, I at first thought she was someone the Democrats were happy to use and discard to stop Judge Kavanaugh. I now suspect that she was in on the plot, if not from the beginning, then from well before her letter was leaked to the press.
There have been many efforts to rationalize or explain what it is that the Democrats have been doing with their search-and-destroy occupation of what Judge Kavanaugh aptly describes as the Twilight Zone. Yes, it is certainly true that the Democrats do not want Brett Kavanaugh, an ardent constitutionalist, to take Anthony Kennedys seat. That would rob the court of Kennedys impish interventions on many social issues, especially those issue emanating from the girdle of human experience: abortion, and sexuality in all its florid, increasingly polymorphous manifestations.
It is understandable that leftistshaving gotten used to the idea that the court can be weaponized as an instrument of progressive social engineering when Congress, still subject to that pesky voice of the people, is recalcitrant to push ahead to utopiashould be unhappy about that prospect. But, hey, thats how we run things in this democratic republic. We have elections, elections have consequences (as a gloating pol once observed), and we abide by the processes that have grown up in our institutions and that are the expression of the rule of law.
Besides, Brett Kavanaugh is not a fire-breathing reactionary. On the contrary, although personally conservative, he is a thoughtful, deliberate jurist, the hallmarks of whose practice have been impartiality and a concern to follow the law. The Democrats mightand God willing, eventually willfind the court populated with justices far more doctrinaire in their originalism. Kavanaugh, when he is confirmed (and I continue to believe he will be) will endeavor to uphold the Constitution, not twist it for ideological ends.
But increasingly I have come to believe that the satanic circus the Democrats have let loose around this confirmation hearing is only incidentally about Brett Kavanaugh.
...
There was a precedent crime, after all, but it wasnt one that appears in the statute book. Rather, as in some common law traditions, it is simply part of the agreed upon and customary narrative of our polityor at least the people who govern our polity. What is it? In short, the crime was Donald Trumps election. More precisely, the crime was the fact that Donald Trump was elected without the permission, indeed, over the strenuous objections of that entitled cohort whose members believe it to be part of the natural order of things that they govern.
The implications of this convictionthat the primal crime of Trumps administration was his election, compounded by his infuriating habit of meeting any attack with a potent counterattackare huge.
Among other things, it follows that Donald Trumps tenure is, for these people, existentially illegitimate. And from that conviction it follows that a policy of resistance, obstruction, and illegality is (in the minds of these people) sanctioned. It is OK, for example, for a Justice Department official to boast that he is conducting a guerrilla war of resistance behind the scenes. It is OK to stalk Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and his wife to their favorite restaurant and scream at them until they are forced to leave. Why? Because Cruz supports Kavanaugh. And so on. (Wouldnt you like to know what Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said to the spineless GOP Senator Jeff Flake the other day just before Flake announced that he would allow Kavanaughs confirmation to proceed to the Senate floor only if there were another FBI investigation authorized into his behavior in high school?)
Here is my thought. The scurrilous attempt at character assassination directed at Brett Kavanaugh is part of a larger war: the war to demonstrate that Donald Trump, though duly elected in a free, open, and democratic process, is fundamentally illegitimate.
...
In the normal course of events, Id say the situation of the Republicans was nearly hopeless. They are not used to fighting back. Many (most?) of them seem to feel, deep down, that the Democrats are right that only they truly have the right to exercise power, that, at the end of the day, Republicans are really just conservative window-dressing for the real business of government, which is pursuing the transnational progressive agenda. (Not to mention how many Republicans are really just Democratic deep-state actors with an R after their name.)
The silver lining in all this is the fact that these are not normal times. Donald Trump won, elections have consequences, and we are seeing the consequences all around us, not just in the astonishing success of the Trump agenda but also in the new energy Trumps example has imparted to some (not you, Jeff Flake, not you) of the Republican brethren.
Has Lindsey Graham ever given a more impressive performance than he did at the Senate hearing the other day, castigating the despicable behavior of his colleagues for exactly what it was? I see that the Senate Judiciary Committee has begun to pursue people who emerged from the swamp to hurl unfounded accusations at Brett Kavanaugh: lying to a federal officer is a felony punishable by up to five years in prison. Those whom the FBI is now contacting as part of their supplemental background check into Brett Kavanaugh ought to keep that in mind. So, Id reckon, should Christine Ford, supposing the FBI ever gets around to questioning her. The Democrats wanted all-out war. All-out war is exactly what Donald Trump is going to give them.
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote
1,621 posted on
10/02/2018 12:55:36 PM PDT by
Darnright
(We live in interesting times.)
To: ransomnote
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/1/trump-space-force-parade-scuttled-inflating-cost/
Pentagon officials accused of artificially inflating costs to scuttle Trump priorities
Public opinion turned against military parade, Space Force after high cost estimates
FTA:
...
The idea of using sticker shock to undercut one of Mr. Trumps controversial proposals was used to great success over the summer. The presidents plan for a military parade in Washington was initially estimated to cost somewhere from $10 million to $30 million and had tentatively been scheduled for Veterans Day.
By mid-August, however, Pentagon officials began whispering that they would need to spend about $50 million on military vehicles, aircraft and equipment for the parade. Another $42 million, they said, would need to be divided among federal agencies and departments handling security for the event, bringing the overall cost to a whopping $92 million.
In on-the-record comments, the Defense Department said that figure wasnt final, but once it had leaked into the public discussion, the idea quickly died. Mr. Trump pulled the plug on the parade shortly after the $92 million figure was leaked.
...
In its September memo outlining the $13 billion in costs, Air Force officials proposed spending nearly $600 million for additional personnel, $1 billion to build a combatant command headquarters, $7.2 billion for Space Force elements and a host of other expenses.
...
But analysts say the Space Force, at least in its first few years, could be established with a far more modest budget.
They argue that space-related parts of existing services, such as the Air Force Space Command, could stay in their current facilities but simply work under the organizational umbrella of the Space Force. Some analysts question whether its necessary to follow the Air Forces blueprint and move large, expensive departments such as the National Reconnaissance Office into the Space Force. They also say the new branch could use other services recruiting facilities.
You can do this with almost no investment of dollars if you choose to and let it evolve, Mr. Loverro said.
More broadly, some retired military officials argue that critics of the idea inside the Pentagon are choosing to focus on how difficult and expensive a Space Force could be rather than looking for ways to stand it up cheaply and efficiently.
...
To: ransomnote; oldngray; bagster; grey_whiskers; TEXOKIE; TXnMA; stylin19a; bitt; little jeremiah; ...
SWORDMAKERS
FreeQers
LexiQonTuesday, October 2, 2018
12:55 PM PDT
Swordmaker Senior Editor
CJ Wolf, KitJ, StormFlag, TexOkie Associate Editors
SKIP READING
THIS LEXIQON UPDATE
If you would like to be added or removed from the LexiQon Update Notification List, Click Below:
Freepmail Swordmaker.
To explore the Qomplete up-to-date LexiQon,
Qlick on the Q iQon above.
100,861 WORDS!!!
The equivalent of ~476 printed pages.
Link to List of Notable Resignations
Q Says We Should Watch
IMPORTANT NOTICE
It turns out there is a very good reason why Q
is always saying to re-read the crumbs or Drops!
THEYVE CHANGED! Future DOES affect the Past!
PLEASE VOLUNTEER!
The LexiQon needs editor FreeQs to compare sections of the
LexiQon with the referenced Q drops in the Aggregator Site used to
find anything that may have been amended by Q since the Drop was first put up.
If you can help, please Freepmail Swordmaker so a section of the LexiQon can
be assigned so no FreeQs are duplicating anothers efforts. Thanks! Swordmaker.
LexiQon Index
Improved LexiQon Navigation!
Jump Instantly Between Each LexiQon Section!
Symbols & Numbers
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Government Officials
who have been fired, resigned,
or who are not seeking reelection
END
Todays revisions and additions:
- AATW: (#2313) A very badly injured veteran Anon signed of with AATW, which is most likely "Airborne, All The Way," referring to the motto of the American Paratroopers. (Credit FreeQ Melian).
- Palo Alto University: (INFO) Palo Alto University is the college where Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who accused U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Trump's nominee to the Supreme Court, of sexually assaulting her while both were in high school 36 years ago, is currently a professor of Psychology. Although the name implies a large, multi-discipline university, it is not. It is a non-profit, private educational institution in Palo Alto, California, with 1,081 students and a staff of just 129 employees including forty-eight clerical and eighty-one educational instructors. It was founded in 1975 as the Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, and changed its name to its current name when it added undergraduate two undergraduate degrees in psychology. Palo Alto University offers two undergraduate degree programs and four graduate programs: a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology, a Psychology Doctorate in Clinical Psychology as part of a consortium with Stanford University, and two master's degree programs: a Master of Arts in Counseling and a Master of Science in Psychology. (information provided by Wikipedia).(See Christine Blasey Ford, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump, United States Supreme Court).
- Reddit (#2165, #2198) Reddit is a social media content-sharing, blogging, and commenting site which held itself out as a place where free speech reigned supreme. Ironically, on September 12, 2018, the Q discussion SubReddit area on Reddit called /r/The_GreatAwakening was abruptly banned with no warning, due to "Inciting violence, harassment, and dissemination of personal information." It is highly unlikely that any of the participants making comments on those threads, unless they were deliberate trolls, made any such comments. In Q drop #2198 Q directs us to these Reddit use Statistics for the /r/The_GreatAwakening SubReddit which show the impact to usage the unwarranted take-down had:
A peak at /r/greatawakening traffic stats from before the ban
It is quite obvious the SubReddit was taken down for political reasons because of the political pro-Trump content. Previously, the same week as the take down of the Q discussion area, Reddit also took down a comedy discussion area for MillionDollarExtreme and associated subs /r/BillionShekelSupreme and /r/ChadRigh, belonging to what the administrators term an "Alt Right Comedy Troop. The reason again was described as content that violated Reddit's new content codes, specifically "violent content." In other words, it wasn't Liberal, Progressive, politically correct content.
In Q Drop #2314 Q points out once again that "Symbolism will be their downfall" under a copy of Reddit's advertisement for Reddit Premium which includes a faux Reddit coat of arms made up of too cutesy cartoon characters. Included on the image are various symbols including the Pyramid with the Eye of Destiny/Providence similar to the one found on the back of a U.S. one-dollar Federal Reserve Note.
Pyramid with Eye of Destiny/Providence
Steve Huffman, better known on Reddit as spez, is the co-founder and current CEO of Reddit and responsible for the current censorship. BigLeaguePolitics broke the story that Top Moderators from Reddit revealed that it was an organized cabal of left-wing posters who organized the take down of /r/The_GreatAwakening on Reddit. A CBS employee, using a group of lefties, including "More than 30 covert left-wing actors have been identified coordinating with the plotters, including activists linked to Media Matters and the ACLU," who call themselves "BanOut2018, pretending to be Trump supporters posted inflammatory commentary in the Q forums which would instantly be given comparatively large numbers of up-votes by their organized cronies. These high positive responses to violent and harassing comments, which violate the rules of Reddit, naturally bring the moderators attention to the SubReddit. Enough of them, too frequently posted, result in the banning of the entire topic, regardless of the negative response from the regular users complaints and request the interloping trolls cease posting. The CBS employee has been identified by the top Reddit moderators as Gary Phillips, who serves as digital media administrator for CBS Studios International in Los Angeles.
BanOut2018 SubReddit Page
Phillips runs a private subreddit in which he makes clear his liberal ideology, and plans his covert actions against Trump subreddits according to copious information reviewed by the editorial staff. (Credit FreeQ Steven W.). (See BanOut2018, censorship, Federal Reserve, Gary Phillips, Media Matters, Social Media, Steve Huffman, Symbols, Troll).
- Ricin: (#2315) Ricin is a carbohydrate-binding protein produced in the seeds of the castor oil plant, Ricinus communis, is a highly potent toxin which blocks the synthesis of proteins necessary for life. A dose of purified ricin powder the size of a few grains of table salt can kill an adult human. The median lethal dose (LD50 the amount of a poison which will kill 50% of those which are given that dosage) of ricin is around 22 micrograms per kilogram of body weight if the exposure is from injection or inhalation (1.78 milligrams for an average adult). Oral exposure to ricin is far less toxic as some of the poison is inactivated in the stomach. An estimated lethal oral dose in humans is approximately 1 milligram per kilogram. Symptons of Ricin poisoning vary according to the mode of delivery:
- Inhalation: Within three to four hours flu like symptoms develop with breathing difficulties, respiratory distress, fever, cough, nausea, and tightness in the chest. Heavy sweating may follow as well as fluid building up in the lungs (pulmonary edema) mimicking pneumonia. This rapidly worsens as the lungs fill with fluid. Death occurs within 24 to 72 hours.
- Oral injection: If sufficient dosage survives inactivation by stomach acids, vomiting, diarrhea would been within several hours, leading to bloody vomitus and diarrhea. This leads to Severe dehydration may be the result, followed by low blood pressure. Other signs or symptoms may include seizures, and blood in the urine. Within several days, the victim's liver, spleen, and kidneys would stop working, and the victim could die without major medical support within three to five days.
- Skin and Eye exposure: It is unlikely to be absorbed through normal skin. Contact with ricin powders or products may cause redness and pain of the skin and the eyes. However, if you touch ricin that is on your skin and then eat food with your hands or put your hands in your mouth, you may ingest some.
In early October 2018, envelopes containing a white powder which tested positive for Ricin, were received at the Pentagon. No Pentagon personnel were injured by the Ricin attack using the envelops. For more information on Ricin and attacks in the past using Ricin, see the Wikipedia Article on Ricin and the Medicine Net article on Ricin.
Revisions and Additions made In the Last LexiQon Update:
CLICK HERE TO SKIP YESTERDAYS
UPDATES IF YOUVE ALREADY READ THEM.
- Blumenthal, Richard: (#2283) Hypocrital Senator Richard Blumenthal is an attorney (amazing) and politician who has served as a two term Democratic United States Senator from Connecticut since 2011. He has been the state's senior senator since 2013 and is ranked as the second wealthiest member of the Senate. Previously, he served as Attorney General of Connecticut from 1991 to 2011.
During the overtime hearings on the nomination of U.S. D.C. Appeals Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who at the last moment before the committee confirmation vote to send his nomination to the floor had been blindsided by an allegation that he, while still in high school, some thirty-six years ago, had attempted to sexually assault a fifteen year old girl, Senator Blumenthal assuming the guilt of Kavanaugh, after claiming the judge had lied about a simple difference in interpretation between how the Senator was reading an entry in Kavanaugh's high school yearbook and what Kavanaugh told him it really meant, which was sworn to by a person mentioned in the entry, cited the latin phrase "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" and asked the judge, one of America's finest legal minds, if he knew what it means, implying that he was going to say that Kavanaugh was lying. Kavanaugh tossed it back to the Senator with the line, "You translate that, I suspect you would know better than I."
This was a direct barb at Senator Blumenthal who had run for senate and before that for Attorney General on his record as a Vietnam war hero, telling stories of his heroic actions and displaying medals he received in the Marine Corps. The problem was that Blumenthal never went to Vietnam, never partook in any battles, never performed the heroic acts he bragged about, and in fact, never left the continental U.S. when he was in the military. He won his elections on "Stolen Valor," LIES. The latin phrase that Judge Kavanaugh threw back in Blumenthal's face, "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus", translates to English as "If you lie about one thing, you'll lie about everything." The Judge showed him up for who and what he was! That's why Blumenthal abruptly changed the subject. (See Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Jeff Flake, Christine Blasey Ford, Senator Lindsey Graham, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump).
- FFFFFFake, FFFFFFlake, FFFFFFName: (INFO) Arizona Republican (In Name Only) Senator Jeff Flake. Insulting sobriquets coined by FreeQs TruthWillWin after Flake FFFFFFaked out on the Judge Brett Kavanaugh vote as the nominee for the current vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court in exchange for his committee vote to move the nomination to the Senate Floor for final approval. He flaked out by giving in to the Democrat committee members' demand of further delay in the confirmation vote by allowing time for an FBI investigation of Christine Blasey Ford's allegation of a 36 year old teen age sexual assault for which she can provide no detailed evidence including location, date, or any only named witnesses who deny the event ever occurred, and for which Kavanaugh has a contemporaneous calendar for the entire time period accounting for his activities which does not allow for him to have attended any such an event.(Credit FreeQs bitt and TruthWillWin). (See Arizona, Senator Jeff Flake, Christine Blasey Ford, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, RINO).
- Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus: (INFO) "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus." is a Latin language phrase that means "If you'll lie about one thing, you'll lie about everything." In legal terms, it means if one is caught in a lie, everything said there aftercare be considered a lie as well, untrustworthy. Pronunciation of the Latin: "Fahl-tsoos een oon-oh, Fahl-tsoos een Ahm-nee-boos. (See Senator Richard Blumenthal, Judge Brett Kavanaugh).
- Feinstein, Dianne: (#1962, #2276, #2280, #2281) Dianne Goldman Berman Feinstein is a politician serving as the extreme Leftist Democratic senior United States Senator from California, a seat she has held since 1992. A member of the Democratic Party, she previously was Mayor of San Francisco from 1978 to 1988, which she won after the assassination of Harvey Milk. A rabid anti-gun activist, Feinstein has been a longtime proponent of the "assault weapon" registration, modification, and outright bans.
In early July of 2018, Feinstein received a letter from Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, a professor of Psychology at Palo Alto University (California), which made allegations that Judge Brett Kavanaugh, a Judge on the D.C. Court of Appeals, had drunkenly sexually assaulted her, just short of rape, some thirty-five or so years before at a high school beer party when Ford was a mere fifteen years of age. When Judge Kavanaugh was nominated by President Trump to fill the vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court left by the retirement of Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, Feinstein, instead of revealing this explosive allegation, sat on it all the way past the conclusion of the normal hearings and background investigations. Meanwhile arranging for Ford to have legal counsel, polygraph examinations, and private Democrat investigations. Days after the close of the hearings, the letter to Feinstein was somehow "leaked" to the press. However in testimony it was revealed that Ford had mailed copies of her story to both the New York Times and the Washington Post months before and they also sat on it.
Feinstein's arranged lawyers delayed the Judicial Committee's vote on Kavanaugh for an additional ten days while all ten Democrat members of the committee held press conferences demanding she be heard and believed, denigrating Kavanaugh as already guilty as charged. When time for testimony arrived on September 27, 2018, Feinstein as ranking member lead a lockstep assault on Kavanaugh's character, demanding he accept an additional delay for the FBI to do an investigation. The final vote was eleven Yea to eight Nay, with two Democrats walking out. One Republican, Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona, a RINO, made his Yea vote conditional on there being an FBI investigation of not more than one week before the final floor vote. (See Senator Jeff Flake, Christine Blasey Ford, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, FBI, RINO).
- Flake, Jeff: (#139, #272, #1009, #1319, #1850) Jeff Flake is a one term Republican from Arizona who Q has referred to in post #1009 as a Road Block. Although he is the author of a book entitled The Mind of a Conservative, Flake is frequently called a RINO by true conservatives, as he frequently votes with Democrats and his book outlines a progressive agenda and he votes against President Trumps agenda. He is the junior Arizona senator to the late Senator John McCain. Flake has announced he will not seek re-election to a second term in 2018.
On September 28, 2018, the final vote to move Judge Brett Kavanaugh vote as the nominee for the current vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court in exchange for his committee vote to move the nomination to the Senate Floor for final approval. Flake FFFFFFaked out by giving in to the Democrat committee members' demand for further delay in the confirmation vote by allowing time for an FBI investigation of Christine Blasey Ford's allegation of a 36 year old teen age sexual assault for which she can provide no detailed evidence including location, date, or any only named witnesses who deny the event ever occurred, and for which Kavanaugh has a contemporaneous calendar for the entire time period accounting for his activities which does not allow for him to have attended any such an event. (See (Arizona, Christine Blasey Ford, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, FFFFFFake, FFFFFFlake, FFFFFFName, John McCain, RINO).
- Flystain, Senator Dianne: Rude but accurate epithet for California Leftist Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein. For more complete information see the Feinstein, Dianne LexiQon entry.
- Ford, Christine Blasey (INFO) Christine Margaret Blasey Ford is an professor of psychology at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine. Ford is the woman who made a supposed last minute allegation after the close of the hearings on President Trump's nominee to fill the vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court, of a 36 year old sexual attack upon herself that she claims was made by a then teen-aged Brett Kavanaugh when she was just fifteen years old. However, it turns out she actually made her complaint to her Congresswoman in early July, before the hearings even started, and had actually been in the Washington area on August 7, also before the hearings, just 33 miles away, to take a polygraph test, contrary to her statements that she was fearful of flying, which later delayed her appearance before the committee by ten days so she could travel to Washington. In fact, it came out in her testimony, that Senator Dianne Feinstein's staff retained representation for her in early July, apparently before Judge Kavanaugh had even been informed that he was the nominee by President Trump. These all belie her earlier supposedly statements. The Democrat Judicial Committee members, led by Senator Feinstein, sat on this information from early July until after the finish of the testimony to expose it.
The myth is, as she testified, is that Ford wished to alert the Judiciary Committee members and President Trump about her explosive allegations before Trump made his final selection from his short list of candidates, so she wrote her letter begging confidentiality. If this were true why did she not write President Trump instead of writing her Democrat Congresswoman and then her Democrat U.S. Senator? When asked under oath, this PhD said "I didn't know how." The other interesting fact here is that Judge Brett Kavanaugh was a surprise nominee who was not on either of the two lists released by President Trump as a candidate.She also wrote letters to the New York Times and the Washington Post relating her allegations. Those are not the acts of a woman seeking anonymity.
Ford's story claims that at age fifteen, after an afternoon of swimming practice, while attending a summer evening beer drinking party with four inebriated teen-age boys, Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge, P.J. Smyth, all two years older than her, plus another unnamed boy, and at least one other girl, her lifelong girlfriend Leland Keyser, she was sexually assaulted. This event is weak on details: the party which she does not recall how she knew about it, as described by Ford, took place at a house with unknown owners, with an unknown host, at an unknown location, on an unknown date, and she really is unclear as to how she got there of how she eventually got home, although, now in testimony, looking puzzled, vaguely claims that Leland Keyser (who does not recall it) drove her home. The location is vaguely located approximately close to the country club where she was swimming. . . and which is at least fourteen to fifteen miles from her home.
During the course of the party, Ford claims she drank one beer. She needed to go up a short flight of stairs to the bathroom when she says she was suddenly shoved into a bedroom by one of two boys, either Brett Kavanaugh or Mark Judge, who then locked the door behind them. Kavanaugh then threw her on the bed and got on top of her and started grinding his genitals on her while groping her. Judge was alternately encouraging Kavanaugh or telling him to stop, then jumping on them. One of the boys had turned the volume on a radio that was already playing in the room when they entered so that her cries for help could not be heard to the others down stairs. When she tried to scream, Kavanaugh put his hand over her mouth, causing her to fear he might "accidentally kill me." Kavanaugh was drunkenly trying to remove her clothing but was not being successful due to her wearing a "one piece swim suit under my clothes." Ford relates that on the second time Judge jumped on them on the bed they toppled over such that Kavanaugh was no longer on top of her and she was able to escape, run across the landing to the bathroom and lock herself in, where she waited. She heard the boys, "laughing, drunkenly pin-balling off the walls down the stairs" at which point she left the bathroom ran down the stairs, through the living room where the others were talking and went outside and went home. Various stories she related had her walking home, riding home, or, in testimony, having Leland drive her home, but not ever telling her of the sexual assault.
Her story and the name of her attackers only came out in 2012, when she had to enter "couples therapy" because she had insisted that when they remodeled their home that it had to have "two front doors" against the advice of her husband and the remodelers. Why this was important to her and what it had to do with a 36 year old assault is never explained. It is ALSO at the exact time that then Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney had listed Brett Kavanaugh on his short list of potential Supreme Court nominees.
The four people who Christine Blasey Ford names as being present at the claimed party, including Ford's lifelong girlfriend, to a person deny that the party, or the events, ever occurred. Ford also took the steps of scrubbing her social media and internet presence, an unusually effective scrubbing to boot which shows expert help, not to mention an unusual move for someone who is merely wishing to provide factual information to the hearings.
Leftists will stop at nothing. On September 28, in response to an request made by the Maryland Democratic Caucus Chair to the Montgomery County Police Department and the Maryland State's Attorneys Office to open a criminal investigation of the allegations that Brett Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted and attempted to rape Christine Blasey in their jurisdiction somewhere, sometime over thirty-five years ago. The Chief of County Police, J. Thomas Manger, and the State's Attorney, for Montgomery County Maryland jointly signed the response letter.
". . .in 1982, assault and attempted rape were both misdemeanors and subject to a
one-year statue of limitations.
All of these accusations are for naught and based on misapplications of the law. Even in the hearings the questioners and the Judge himself were under the misapprehension the violation of these many years ago was a felony and had no statute of limitations. Such is not the case. (Credit FreeQ Steven W.)
In relating her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Ford affected the mien of a teenage girl, with a very high voice that at times she forgot in answering the questions put to her and reverted to the voice of an adult woman, and wearing oversize glasses, which had the effect of making her look smaller. She also demonstrated an unusual ignorance for a PhD in Psychology about topics she would be expected to know in that field such as the use of polygraphs. An expert body language analysis is quite instructive to watch. The expert discusses the use of psychological ploys by Ford in her testimony. Once pointed out by the expert, they become quite obvious and impossible to not see. Of particular interest were the comments about her eye movements that are unconscious which people all do when accessing parts of the memory having to do with real events which are visual and those with created fiction that was written down.
(See FBI, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Sen. Jeff Flake, Sen. Lindsey Graham, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Social Media, President Trump).
- Graham, Lindsey: (#975, #1305, #2290, #2291, #2294) Senator Lindsey Olin Graham is an American politician and retired U.S. Air Force Reserve colonel serving as the senior United States Senator from South Carolina, a seat he has held since 2003. He is a member of the Republican Party. A native of Central, South Carolina, Graham graduated from the University of South Carolina in 1977. He received his Juris Doctor from the University of South Carolina School of Law in 1981.
During the overtime hearings the Democrats engineered to smear the name, career, reputation, and family of DC Appellate Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump's nominee to fill the vacant Supreme Court seat left by the retirement of Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, by claiming he had sexually assaulted a teenage girl thirty-six years ago when he, too, was a teenage high school student, Senator Graham rose to the occasion and made a barn-burning, rip-snorter of a speech ripping a new rear orifice in the behinds of every Democrat for their unethical behavior and the damage they were doing to the nominee, his family, the Nation, the Senate, and the Constitutional process of "Advise and Consent." Graham's outrage was palpable. Unfortunately it had little effect on Democrats with no sense of right or wrong and no ethical moorings. . . and one Republican Senator. (See Dianne Feinstein, Senator Jeff Flake, Christine Blasey Ford, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, RINO, President Trump).
- Kavanaugh, Brett: (#2199) U.S. Circuit Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh soon to be confirmed as U.S Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Nominated by President Donald Trump after the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy, Kavanaugh had completed a contentious round of hearings and, after all testimony was closed, and Kavanaugh was awaiting the vote of the Senate Judiciary committee, ranking minority member Senator Dianne Feinstein, (D - California) suddenly announced she had been in possession for several months of an anonymous letter from a woman, who requested her letter and the incident there-in NOT be revealed, but who none-the-less, anonymously accused a teenaged Kavanaugh and another high school aged boy of, approximately thirty-five years ago, "locking her in a room against her will at a party, from which she eventually escaped. Feinstein demanded the nomination be sidelined until the allegation could be thoroughly investigated by the FBI. However, the FBI declined to investigate.
The letter, with sufficient details to identify the writer, was leaked to the Mainstream Media press (which we later learned already had it, along with the FBI, and other Democrat members of the Senate Judiciary committee who sat on it, since July!) and the story grew from merely "locking her into a room" to a "drunken" attempt at groping, attempted forced undressing, assault with the intent to commit rape, and an attempted rape of an underage minor, and "fear of he might take my life!" All of which went un-reported. However, they were not alone, and the other witness says it never happened, and Judge Kavanaugh claims not only did he not do it, he cannot recall ever being at a party such as the woman describes. The woman, Christine Blasey Ford, a Stanford (California) Professor of Psychology and Social Work, has been uncovered to be a leftist, anti-Trump activist who spent the weekend before she decided to "come out," scrubbing her social media histories, apparently to hide that very tell-tale trail of rabid leftism.
Ford claims the event "ruined her life". . . yet she went on from age fifteen, when this supposedly happened to her, to get four or more college degrees including two PhDs, one in Social Work and another in Psychology, marry successfully, give birth to four children, and become a full professor at a prestigious university. She says the traumatic incident really only came out in couples therapy in 2012, but Ford says she cannot recall exactly where, when, or even who was at the party where it happened, and told the therapist there were four unnamed boys, who have now been conflated down to two. We also now know that her parents were involved as defendants in an expensive foreclosure case in 1996 in which the judge who decided against them so that they lost their home, was Brett Kavanaugh's mother. Why did she not speak up then to challenge her attacker's mother hearing a case so important to her parents?
On September 27, 2018, The U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary reopened the confirmation hearings for the sole purpose of hearing testimony from Christine Blasey Ford and Judge Brett Kavanaugh's response. as well as questions to both from a special attorney engaged for the purpose, and committee members of both parties. Dr. Ford was treated politely and attentively by both sides as she related her story, but did not reveal anything new. One thing that did come out is that Senate Democratic staff members had been instrumental in retaining attorneys for Dr. Ford at the beginning of July, even before Kavanaugh had received notification he was the nominee from President Trump, which belied some of the "reluctant witness narrative."
However, later in the day, when it came time for Judge Kavanaugh's testimony, only the Republicans treated him respectfully and politely. The minority Democrats were rude, interruptive and accusative, not letting Kavanaugh complete an response before interrupting him to argue their position. Kavanaugh was righteously angry about the evidence less allegations which have less than no corroboration but actual denials from the people named as participants in events that to a person, including personal friends of Ford, attest under oath never occurred. Kavanaugh displayed the righteous indignation of an innocent man whose reputation, family, career, and credibility had been deliberately and maliciously maligned by lies. He did it without attacking Dr. Ford herself, but instead offered her sympathy for what was done to her by someone else.
Kavanaugh went through his contemporaneous 1982 calendar/diary which he meticulously kept up-to-date, emulating the calendar his father kept, demonstrating there were no unaccounted for dates on which this unknown date, location party, with specific attendees could have taken place, because he was mostly out of town, visiting prospective colleges, football camp, beach week, etc. While there were some social gatherings and occasional beer blast, Kavanaugh was meticulous in recording where and who was in attendance. Meanwhile, Democrats were focusing on comments on Kavanaugh's page in his high school year book, taking the worst interpretation possible even if it smeared someone with that worst innuendo. . . even when that person had already submitted a sworn affidavit that it had an innocent explanation.
On September 28, 2018, at approximately 1:54 PM, the committee vote was finally held. Kavanaugh was approved by a vote of 11 Aye to 8 Nay, with two Democrat committee members literals walking out of the hearing room instead of voting instead of voting. One Republican, Arizona Senator Jeff Flake made his vote a conditional Aye vote, siding with Democrats, explaining he would vote No on the floor if there were no FBI investigation, limited to one week and that his AYE vote in committee was conditional on an FBI investigation. President Trump ordered the limited FBI investigation less than an hour later at the request of the Senate leadership. (See FBI, FFFFFFake, Senator Jeff Flake, President Donald Trump, U.S. Supreme Court).
XXX
Oops, maybe I really should read
the LexiQon Updates!
Take me back to Todays Updates.
1,631 posted on
10/02/2018 1:01:03 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
(My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplaphobe bigot!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson