Hi generally, et al! Posting blind here. As always I admire the questions you are able to generate. I found I did have some thoughts which surfaced while reading them:
generally said:
Testing, 1, 2, 3.......
I have a theory I’m going to throw out. I’m not trying to sell it. I’m not sold on it. I’m just rolling it around in my mind trying to see if it makes sense. I’m asking fellow FReeQs to poke holes in it, so have at it. Here goes...
1. We know that both Ds and Rs are Deep State.
2. We know that Trump is trying to clean out the DS.
What if.....
Both Ford and Kavanaugh are DS? They both grew up smack in the middle of the swamp, so it’s entirely possible.
3. We know that the midterm elections are important. Trump would like to have a Red Tsunami to bolster his agenda for the next two years.
What if.....
the whole Kavanaugh hearing was designed to show the public that both Ds and Rs are corrupt and that we’ve all been duped and controlled by the DS for decades and to encourage both D and R voters to come out and vote for Trump’s picks?
4. Read all the Q posts about K. Nowhere does Q explicitly state that he is pro-K. He does say “Justice K confirmation” and we, of course, assume that that means that Q is pro-K.
What if....
Q/Trump want K confirmed for some reason? To bring down a wholly corrupt SCOTUS? To enable impeachment of K and certain other Justices? I don’t have a lot of good theories here, but there are many possibilities and this is such a many-layered operation that I wouldn’t rule this out.
Consider the #1 thing in favor of K (IMO). It’s the fact that Trump picked him. That makes me inclined to support him. #2 is that he has a stellar record, but I have not verified that. I’ve taken it in good faith from other people who’ve said so. I haven’t looked myself at how he’s ruled on various cases. And with apologies to the lawyerFReeQs out there, I’m not a fan of lawyers and put no stock in the glowing letter about K written by the ABA. They take care of their own, much like the DS or any professional guild.
Some interesting questions (for which I have no answers):
1. What has been happening during the 2 weeks since the initial K hearings? What has the left been up to? What has the right been up to? What has the DS been up to? What has K been up to? What has Trump/Q been up to? Clearly K has been through the wringer. But was it solely due to the stress of dealing with false accusations and threats against his family? Or could it have been due to the stress of true accusations? Or the stress of being given “orders” from the DS or from the white hats? Many possibilities.
2. Why was K so near tears during so much of his opening statement? I kept waiting for it to build up to some specific tearjerker issue, but it did not. I thought the tears over his calendar/diary were going to be related to his father’s death or something. Is his father dead? I haven’t been able to find out. The only moment that I found worthy of Kleenex was the mention of his daughter suggesting they pray for Ford. But yet he was near tears the entire time. Very odd to me. (Also he was doing some weird thing with his tongue which I found unsettling but unless a body language expert can explain, I’m willing to ignore as an odd (though creepy-looking) tic.)
3. Why was he so evasive about having an FBI investigation? I can completely understand not wanting one. Who would? But wouldn’t they find evidence to clear him if he is indeed completely innocent? Or is there something worse he is afraid they would find? If I had been in his shoes and I were innocent, my objection would be that the Ds were just trying to stall and delay, but he never said that. He only seemed to be trying to avoid it. That makes me ask why.
4. Trump said he found Ford credible. !!! I did not. That makes me think there is much more to this situation than meets the eye. I.e., we on the outside of the power elite in DC cannot see everything that is going on and there is much that is going on.
5. I found almost nothing in Ford’s testimony to be credible or worthy of investigation. Either she was lying, or couldn’t remember on nearly every point. The only thing I will say in her favor is that I think it’s entirely possible to forget specifics after 35 years. That still doesn’t mean I find her believable. Also I know I’m biased but everything about her testimony screamed “acting” and “performance” to me.
6. Did you notice how the Ds kept repeating the word “credible” when describing her accusations? As if by applying that word, it would make it credible. I found that incredible.
7. Did you notice also how her testimony/accusation was described as “her” truth? Since when did we have “her” truth and “his” truth? What ever happened to “the” truth? When I hear someone say “my” truth or “her” truth that immediately sets off alarm bells in my head that say “lying”.
8. Do you find it interesting or coincidental or convenient that we are now delaying a vote until the vicinity of Oct 3 which is the test of the Presidential Alert System? Remember that the original vote was scheduled to be the same day as the test, but then both got delayed? Is that significant? It sure seems like it to me. But why?
Ok, have at it. Please attack my arguments and statements and let me know where there are holes in it, large or small. Of course if you have any supporting arguments, those are welcome, too.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
texokie responds:
As long as we are flipping everything over:
I saw a story positing that sleeze lawyer, Avenatti - along with Stormy, are actually White Hats or leveraged into helping the Trump/Q Plan. If that is the case, it would certainly fit in with your hypothetic scenario. (That is hard to really buy.... but it certainly is possible.)
GW BUSH has been batting for BK to get confirmed. This makes me think that indeed there may be a DS mechination going on in here somewhere. Or maybe GW is trying to rack up a little bit of good karma before everything starts coming apart.
Laura Ingraham: states frequently that she has known BK in context of the Supreme Court clerking they were doing. Is she a DS???? Or if he is DS and she is not, was his mask so good that he fooled her, as he supposedly has for so many women all through his life who have spoken up for him in recent days? Or are they both bona fide White Hats as we have been supposing them to be? (Of course I prefer the last, but I do have an open mind and try to think “logically.” At the same time I hope my open mind does not allow my brain to fall out.
RE your point number 4., where you are not seeing indicators of Q being Pro-K. I recalled that Q DOES say “ Welcome aboard, Judge K.” in #2277. That certainly seems pro K to me. He states “Welcome aboard” to both Judge K and Alan Dershowitz. He does welcome Rudy G to the White House, but does not state “ welcome aboard.”
Was K a DS who got forgiven and is whole heartedly hitting now for the White Hats? Or, as your questions suggest, an in-for-darkness Black Hat? (Oh I hope not.) In any case now, if he’s had moderate or liberal biases and tendencies, having been so publicly mugged, perhaps he has been flipped, as some of the memes suggest. A liberal is a conservative who has not been mugged. This has certainly been much more than a mugging - it has been arguably a crucifixion. I wonder how this will affect him from here on out - whether he sits on the high bench or not.
TEXOKIE,
You make some great points and bring up some issues that I was unaware of. (GWB support!) A point against him ... unless this is multi-D chess.
I’m still turning a lot of this over in my mind and on the fence. But in the course of so much thinking about this, one of the primary thoughts that occurs to me is K’s history after HS and college. He appears to have lived an exemplary life with not a whiff of predatory behavior. So based on the opinion held by many (including me) that it is exceedingly rare for a predator to suddenly change, I’m inclined to think that he never was one. If he is/was one, then the coverup would be nearly impossible.
So very strong point in his favor.
My theory is that Judge K was raised in the heart of the swamp but his mom was also a judge and he has a lot of history to draw on from her. He may be someone who saw all the corruption but stayed aloof from it.
He may have learned to do that in high school. His friend sounds like a partier but, with a judge for a mom, he remained on the edge of the party. His virginity is also evidence of a moral compass during confusing times. Many teens who party lose their virginity just to get it over with.