Kavanaugh is already damaged goods even if he gets confirmed. There are lots of equal rights cases coming to the supreme court many of which are “me too cases”. Any time one comes to the fore, they will drag out Kavanaugh’s confirmation fight and suggest that he “recuse himself” as he might be considered “prebiased” against the women. He might be considered prebiased in the future should he just go back to his old job for every equal rights case that comes to his court might cause a request that he recuse himself.
And that "pre-biased" notion is silly. If it were that easy to taint a judicial nominee for future cases simply by making accusations in a certain area of law, political hacks would make dozens of accusations against one nominee that involve all conceivable areas of law that may come under future consideration by the court.
When appointed, Kavanaugh should NEVER recuse him self. He should rule on every case before him, following the Constitution. To do otherwise would be pandering to this LIB lunacy and to those who despise men. These LIB lunatics must be crushed. I hope he is appointed, livers a very long life and serves for many decades.
When appointed, Kavanaugh should NEVER recuse him self. He should rule on every case before him, following the Constitution. To do otherwise would be pandering to this LIB lunacy and to those who despise men. These LIB lunatics must be crushed. I hope he is appointed, lives a very long life and serves for many decades.
There are not a lot of “equal rights/#metoo” cases coming before the court. None of the cases currently scheduled for the Supreme Court have anything to do with that, and rarely would such a case make it there as those deal with state level criminal law.
In any event, thats not a basis for recusal in the first place—”prebias” is not a thing, and having some personal involvement in a type or class of case does not require recusal. Having a close personal connection to a litigant or other person involved (the defendant is judge’s son, the CEO of the plaintiff company is judge’s cousin), or having a personal interest in the outcome of a particular case (judge has heavy investments in defendant’s company)...those are the types of things that demand recusal.
Yes, that’s WHY she must be PROVEN to be the LYING SKANK SHE IS!!
Yet another crypto-liberal in this thread. Get accused falsely and you have to give up serving or acting nobly in your dream job