Posted on 09/17/2018 10:36:00 PM PDT by ransomnote
> “And there still remains *nothing* that confirms RR as black hat ... except everything else ;) “
You do know who Barsoomian is, don’t you?
But you’re right, there is nothing DIRECTLY confirming RR as a black hat except:
* Uranium One corruption coverup
* Wife Barsoomian
* FISA Warrant Applications Rubberstamping
* Appointing Mueller without evidence of a crime
* Threatening Congressional Staffers
* Openly defying Congress by not producing documents
* Colluding at Five Eyes Summit in Toronto while POTUS in Korea
But should anyone expect the public to have knowledge of evidence that directly implicates RR as a black hat?
Many people were confused as RR had written the memo resulting in the firing of Comey. He fired Cmey because HRC hated Comey for what he did in the week before the election. It’s safe to say HRC wanted Comey dead as she blamed Comey for her election loss. RR understood all this via his wife Barsoomian.
To me, it was RR’s wife that served as the telltale sign of where he was politically, that he was cozy with the black hat society.
__________________
I am interested in this statement:
> “But the clear inference is that RR is on the outs and today is the day when the 210 day window expired.”
I know the 210 day as a waiting period or service period of persons selected to fill certain jobs as part of the 1998 Vacancy Reform Act.
How do you know the 210-day window?
One of the film techniques he is best known for is the Clay and Sand stop motion animation. His film short with that technique, Clay or Origin of the Species was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Animated Short Film.
Here is the short video you reference ...
Clay or Origin of the Species
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
OH my - it is quite creative.... and a bit creepy. I noticed at around 8:13 or a little after, an “All Seeing Eye,” or if one uses Eastern terminology, a “Third Eye Chakra” in the forehead of the human head modeled at that moment.
Definitely he’s heavy into the dog eat dog (or clay eats clay) concept.
Most interesting. Thanks for locating it!
Kennedy’s and Shriver’s went to that school also.
Either I typed the wrong number or they’ve changed again.
Anyway, this is the one I thought was most interesting:
Jul 30 2018 15:57:32 (EST)
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf
>Nicholas Rasmussen (IMPORTANT name to remember)
>Former Director of NCTC
https://www.mccaininstitute.org/staff/nicholas-rasmussen/
Think FISA.
Think NO NAME.
WH visitor logs: NO NAME/HUSSEIN (dates?)
WH visitor logs: NO NAME/BRENNAN/HUSSEIN (dates?)
WH visitor logs: NO NAME/BRENNAN/COMEY/HUSSEIN (dates?)
WH visitor logs: NO NAME/BRENNAN/CLAPPER/RICE/HUSSEIN (dates?)
Replaced by:
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/nctc-who-we-are/director-nctc
>Defense Intelligence Liaison to British Intelligence in London
Think UK.
Current Director of the C_A.
https://www.cia.gov/about-cia/leadership/gina-haspel.html
(UK bio removed)
>CIA’s station chief London, UK
“Furthermore, Haspel is seen as a Russia expert and a close ally of Britains MI6, having being London station chief from 2014 to 2017.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/may/08/gina-haspel-cia-director-atone-past
The more you know.
Q
Hail to the Chief!
LOL! You do make a good point!
KEK,
Great slide on the discussion. Sessions did not recuse because of any discussions with Amb. Kislyak, prior to the election. IIRC, Sessions, recused to any Russian investigation by the Special Counsel against Potus DJT wrt to any involvement by Sessions during the election. Nothing more/ nothing less.
Sure. I also thought it a bit creepy/quirky.
http://www.bookwormroom.com/2018/09/16/
Link above is very interesting.
In a nutshell: Provides evidence that Ford’s accusations against Kavanaugh stem from 2012, when it looked like Romney might win and nominate him. Since Romney didn’t win, the “memories” were not needed.
|
Heh, “Go home to your mother”, KEK
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/pj-smyth-brett-kavanaugh/index.html
looks like she suddenly remembered another person at the party..
at this point, any conservative under the age of 55 is suspect, lol....
That photo was taken at a New York City protest, so the odds are that it is not her, since she lives on the West Coast.
The "pussy hat and stethoscope" photo that is also circulating is definitely not her.
Sometimes mistakes happen because people don't check out their web search results and circulate erroneous information.
Sometimes it's because people just don't care.
Why would it matter if I saw you spit watermelon seeds into the yard? Doesn’t everyone do that?
I know she scrubbed her profiles but if you do a google search for images, there are only 2 or 3 pictures of her - I want to know what she really looks like..
Yes, I knew about that but I was trying to understand the context of your 210-day time window ‘expiring’.
Rachel Brand stepped out or was fired and left 2/20/2018. The number of days between 02/20/2018 and 09/18/2018 is exactly 210 days.
But Jesse Pannucio is a DOJ employee whose tenure as ‘Acting AAG’ under the VRA is now expired. IF RR goes, there is no DOJ AAG to move up into DAG because Panuccio is term-expired. POTUS can select Panuccio to fill RR’s slot or POTUS can select any Senate confirmed individual to serve as Acting DAG for up to 210 days.
So the 210-day ‘Acting’ tenure seems inapplicable with respect to RR.
POTUS can choose between promoting a career DOJ lawyer with a minimum one year on the job to the position of Acting AAG or if RR goes, then promote to Acting DAG, OR POTUS can choose a Senate-confirmed individual from any department to serve as Acting AAG or DAG for up to 210 days.
Anyways, I think the larger point is that DOJ/FBI have been infested with ‘resistance’ Democrats with Obama era holdovers still having desks. In order to have the ‘right’ people populate the key positions requires at least one year on the job or a Senate-confirmed individual.
I am confident that POTUS’s HR recruiter has this problem all mapped out against a timeline.
“Yew owe me a DEBIT!”
If Sessions has unrecused, why would RR still be in a position to obstruct DECLAS? Wouldn’t the “acting” Attorney General simply be no more?
Q ??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.