I don’t see why a hearing would be a legal requirement. Who’s going to argue the other side, anyway? Court could be in the bag for Derps, or just think it would be a waste of time. (Maybe FReeQ lawyers will chime in on this.)
BTW, I consider the most significant moment of the Kavanaugh hearing was when LG went off in a completely different direction, apparently with very specific purpose, and drew Kavanaugh out on some points (at the same time educating the entire nation):
1) We ARE at war, and have been since declared by Congress immediately after 911.
2) In time of war, there is a separate system of justice that applies to enemy combatants.
3) Persons have been executed under this military justice system, including some American citizens who attempted to aid Nazi saboteurs acting inside the U.S. in WWII.
4) Finally, LG asked Kavanaugh to confirm his familiarity with Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004)-—the case which re-affirmed a U.S. citizen who is an enemy combatant (aiding an enemy with whom we are at war) can be dealt with in the Military Justice system (e.g. Gitmo).
I commented to my wife that a lot of people had to be scared silly hearing this. It was like that LITTLE RED LASER DOT appeared on their chest.
It strikes me those things LG was discussing were the source of tremendous gnashing of teeth during Bush era. Now settled law and none of the DEMs wanted to debate it. Getting him confirmed is key to the plan - it appears Grassley has scheduled the committee to meet on 9/13 and then the DEMs will obstruct again before the vote is held on 9/20 ... than on to the whole Senate before SCOTUS sits in RED OCTOBER.
Correction applies to: lawful combatants (gov't backed, in uniform etc.) and unlawful combatants (everyone else engaged in the warfare)
imo, this post by disestablishmentarian merits reposting
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I don’t see why a hearing would be a legal requirement. Who’s going to argue the other side, anyway? Court could be in the bag for Derps, or just think it would be a waste of time. (Maybe FReeQ lawyers will chime in on this.)
BTW, I consider the most significant moment of the Kavanaugh hearing was when LG went off in a completely different direction, apparently with very specific purpose, and drew Kavanaugh out on some points (at the same time educating the entire nation):
1) We ARE at war, and have been since declared by Congress immediately after 911.
2) In time of war, there is a separate system of justice that applies to enemy combatants.
3) Persons have been executed under this military justice system, including some American citizens who attempted to aid Nazi saboteurs acting inside the U.S. in WWII.
4) Finally, LG asked Kavanaugh to confirm his familiarity with Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004)-—the case which re-affirmed a U.S. citizen who is an enemy combatant (aiding an enemy with whom we are at war) can be dealt with in the Military Justice system (e.g. Gitmo).
I commented to my wife that a lot of people had to be scared silly hearing this. It was like that LITTLE RED LASER DOT appeared on their chest.