Posted on 09/04/2018 10:08:54 AM PDT by SMGFan
And then there was the faggy little brother on "Who's The Boss?"
You just knew that kid wasn't going to be straight when he grew up.
If he really had Lisa Bonet back in the day it doesn’t matter, his ticket is punched.
That is too bad. All legal work is worthy of pride in a job well done. I’m sorry he was shamed and sorry he took it personally. He wasn’t a better human being for being on tv. Didn’t his boss prove that?
No, Cosby let EVIL rule his world. There are a lot of guys with penises. They don’t all want unconscious female bodies to destroy.
Amen! Too many people think work is a bad four-letter word!
Because celebrity equates to authority and their opinion a-lines with our’s
Strange isn’t that no one ever sought the political opinion of Bozo the Clown or Jason from Friday the Thirteenth
They’re celebrities
Job shaming by media outlets? Who would do such a thing?
In American Beliefs, John McElroy notes that there were four main colonial powers in America, and each of them found different things and wanted to do different things:
- Spain found bronze-age civilization, and conquered them in a conventional manner as they would have liked to have done in Europe, especially England. Since they found a going concern their only interest was in dominating and exploiting it, rather than creating it. So the only people they sent to their colonies were soldiers and gentlemen to be in charge. No Spanish peons need apply.
- France found in Canada not a going bronze-age civilization but a stone age one. But like Spain, France's primary motivation was control - of navigation of the St. Lawrence River - and trade with the natives. So there was need of traders, but mostly of gentlemen and soldiers to control. Very few peons, even French ones and certainly none other, were needed.
- Portugal found stone age peoples in Brazil. In order to exploit Brazil they sent over workers - in the form of African slaves. Plus of course, gentlemen to control the operation.
- England (it wasn't Great Britain until later) found in the portion of North America which it was able to claim nothing but stone-age people and forests. The land was rich and had tremendous agricultural potential but wasn't farmland until it had been laboriously cleared of trees and vines. The English colonists found that gentlemen were pretty useless; what the situation cried out for was farmers. So England sent over poor people - some, including some of my ancestors, came from Lutheran Germany - and so the American polity was dominated by practical people (even if they often had religious motivations for wanting to come, still they learned that the situation required diligent work).
The conclusion is that Americans respect any honest work. If you reflect on English costume drama, you will realize that we didn't get that attitude from England - where the emphasis was on who you were rather than what you did - but in the American melieu where people who were respected because they were useful, and were respected for the caluses on their hands.
There is also the Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain speech from the film "Gettysburg" (excerpt):
This is a different kind of army. If you look back through history, you will see men fighting for pay, for women, for some other kind of loot. They fight for land, power, because a king leads them or -- or just because they like killing. But we are here for something new. This has not happened much in the history of the world. We are an army out to set other men free.
America should be free ground -- all of it. Not divided by a line between slave state and free -- all the way, from here to the Pacific Ocean. No man has to bow. No man born to royalty. Here, we judge you by what you do, not by who your father was. Here, you can be something. Here, is the place to build a home.
But it's not the land. There's always more land.
It's the idea that we all have value -- you and me.
For most in that line of work, starvation isn’t ever more than a few meals away.
Key actors did okay back then but secondary and so on; no so much. A living wage but not a small fortune to buy apartment buildings so they would have income for life.
That’s what I’d do with a largish sum of money anyway. People will always need a place to live and the income from them goes up with the times. A win win. In fact I’d work it out so others managed and took care of the place(s) so I could be anywhere and not shackled to the apartment building(s).
Yep, that will help ease the “shame” (that some actor suffer doing regular work!).
Well, that’s hard to figure, unless what I wrote before applies here as well.
>>>He said that his acting gigs usually lasted less than 10 weeks per gig, so he had to work a second job. Trader Joe’s let him have a flexible schedule so he could work as an actor, make auditions, etc.
Also, Trader Joe’s offers health insurance to employees. That can be major draw for people in the creative arts.
He was working for a living to support his family. I see absolutely nothing wrong with that and nothing to be ashamed about.
Uhhh..... he didn’t have Lisa Bonet. He had her sister.
I wouldn't blame him at all if he leveraged this unwanted spotlight into a better position. Should have kept the old job though but perhaps the attention had made it a circus.
I have a friend who works at Trader Joe’s. He has worked in retail either at stores he owned or at management level his whole career.
The last time we spoke, he was a team member at Trader Joe’s. He loved the job and was paid very fairly.
One thing he said was that they rotate duties very frequently with even the General Manager taking bagging shifts.
How many actors do you see who get a show and are never heard of again. They need to do something.
Some are very successful outside of acting and others just fade into obscurity (or normalcy)
Perhaps this is my legacy: or yours.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.