[Jack Black]

OK.

I’m going to put this out there for comment.

Based on the Q drop I’m responding to, and a feeling I have had for some time, I am leaning toward Mueller and Rosenweasel being white hats or at least cooperating to save themselves.

Q has said they are both either white or black. Both must be the same.

I have a growing suspicion their roles are part of the same kabuki theater in which Sessions is playing a starring role.

Is anyone else picking up this vibe?

I believe that Huber reports to Rosenstein.

Sessions has left the organization in place where he has only one direct employee, Rosenstein. That seems to imply that Rosenstein and Sessions are on the same page.

If Sessions didn't like or trust Rosenstein he could easily re-do the org chart so he had less span-of-control. As it is, it's a very strange org chart. It would be like a CEO having only the COO reporting to him. Few CEOs would do that, it gives that guy too much power, so you pick off key other organizations to report to you directly, or through Associate AG's you appoint to head them. There are obviously places Sessions could do this, and hasn't. So, my take is he's OK with Rosenstein.

If you assert that Rosenstein is a black hat, then it becomes difficult to cast Huber in the hero role, because he's a major risk of being told to stand down (unless he's reporting directly to Sessions, which is possible, but hasn't been stated anywhere).

[madison10]

WITH good does it do to have Huber report to Rosenwine? Might as well drop into into the Potonac.

[reed13k]

It’s a feeling (them being white hats) I’ve had as well for some time...but the feeling of doubt/mistrust is strong enough I can’t fully commit to it.

But my gut feeling leans hard in that direction...we’ll see.

[DAVEY CROCKETT]

I am hoping its a game of good cop bad cop routine, my parents played this game well when we were teenagers, until I caught on, then the fun really began. LOL

[aMorePerfectUnion]

If you assert that Rosenstein is a black hat, then it becomes difficult to cast Huber in the hero role, because he's a major risk of being told to stand down (unless he's reporting directly to Sessions, which is possible, but hasn't been stated anywhere).

Good thought!

[StormFlag]

Here is a statement about John Huber’s working relationship with DOJ

““I am confident that Mr. Huber’s review will include a full, complete, and objective evaluation of these matters in a manner that is consistent with the law and facts,” Sessions wrote, adding:

I receive regular updates from Mr. Huber and upon the conclusion of his review, will receive his recommendations as to whether any matters not currently under investigation should be opened, whether any matters currently under investigation require further resources, or whether any matters merit the appointment of a special counsel.

Huber will work in coordination with Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who has been examining related issues, Sessions said.,

https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/03/30/5-things-know-prosecutor-probing-fbi-justice-department-actions/

So unlike the Mueller probe, Sessions is getting regular updates and will receive the recommendations direct from Huber according to this source.

[100American]

From Q Post 1711

What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?
Known beforehand?
Optics.
Think logically.
Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?
What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?
Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?
Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?
Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?
Think logically.
One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.
Who does Huber [directly] report to?
Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?
Why is this important?
Why did Sessions recuse?
Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?
What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?
POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?
Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?
When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?
When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?
Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?
LOGICAL THINKING.
Clickbait derails logical thought.
Think for yourself.
Trust yourself.
Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?
You have a front row seat.
Enjoy the show.