[SMGFan]

Alas Poor Larry, he once had SCOTUS dreams.

[GeneralisimoFranciscoFranco]

Let the river of liberal tears flow.

[joma89]

The TDS is strong in this one. The meltdown of leftists continues.

JoMa

[stockpirate]

I think we’ll find down the road that Kavanaugh is Kennedy.......

[reasonisfaith]

So he wrote this because he thinks it will fool Senators into voting against Kavanaugh?

[stockpirate]

I think we’ll find down the road that Kavanaugh is Kennedy.......

I hope not.....

[proud American in Canada]

What impeachable offenses? Can they even be committed before a person is elected?

This is ridiculous. He was duly elected, now time to “move on”

[Zeppo]

The last refuge of a scoundrel such as Laurence H. Tribe is putting false words into the mouths of the founding fathers...

[bagster]

had barely won the presidential election.

Lie #1

(Hillary took a sizable ass-whoopin'.)

committed impeachable offenses during his campaign

Lie #2

(high crimes and misdemeanors were not committed while seated President. Clinton was impeached for obstruction of justice and perjury while in office. )

as impeachment clouds were gathering

Lie #3

(impeachment "clouds" are only in the fever dreams of the derp state media. Even in those dreams, no crimes are alleged or were committed BEFORE Trump was elected).

Three blatant lies before the click. Go to link to discover many more lies the Washington Post can pack into one article.

I bet it's a lot.

Bagster

[backwoods-engineer]

They seek to stop Kavenaugh by any means necessary. Which means we need him on SCOTUS.

[wastoute]

I am actually quite surprised. Considering the lifestyle Trump bragged about living for decades I am quite astonished to discover the Rats have only been able to ferret out TWO women that make these allegations. TWO? That’s it? Trump isn’t even coming close to BJ numbers. TWO? Trump must have been living like a monk for the last two decades if they can only find two bimbos in the last 20 years. He isn’t even close to racking up BJ type numbers.

[Skywise]

The founding fathers would’ve taken up arms against the Democrats at this point.

[maddogtiger]

another hate America fool.

[maddogtiger]

another hate America fool.

[BobL]

The dead white Founding Fathers also did nothing about SLAVERY, so why should we try to channel them?

(spit a bit back at the Left)

[drpix]

Once again: if wasn't for their double standards, Democrats would have no standards at all.

Bill Clinton's nominee for SCOTUS, Stephen Breyer, was confirmed on July 29, 1994.

He was at that time under investigation by DOJ Special Counsel Robert Fiske for Whitewater scandal, suicide of Vince Foster, Travelgate, Filegate. When days later, Aug 4, 1994 that investigation was taken over by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr the Lewinsky scandal was added.

Bill Clinton SCOTUS nominee could be confirmed while he was under a special investigation - that could have led to the SCOTUS - but Trump's can't?

[Truth29]

I thought the Left’s view was that the founding fathers were a bunch of dead old racist White guys who should be erased from history? No. guess not when the WP can practice its usual hypocrisy.

[Texas Eagle]

SOMEbody is in need of some Dr. D.J. Trump’s Butt Hurt Salve.

[Qiviut]

BS. What I suspect is that the Founding Fathers would have had no trouble spotting a “witch hunt”/coup against a sitting Presdent & would have no trouble at all with Trump’s SCOTUS pick in view of Kavanaugh’s interpretation of the Constitution, especially as contrasted to anyone a Democrap would nominate.

[Jack Hammer]

He’s fullasheet.

[Sacajaweau]

The Senates advise and consent is suppose to be about character and legal experience.

The idea that justices would be approved along party lines is an abomination.