Posted on 08/18/2018 10:48:05 AM PDT by rickmichaels
An Iowa appeals board has reversed a judge's ruling that a woman who disparaged Mexicans can claim unemployment benefits because such rhetoric is "common" after President Trump was elected.
Angela Diers filed for unemployment after said she was fired from her job at Dexter Laundry after she said in front of co-workers that she hated “f---ing Mexicans," The Des Moines Register reported Wednesday.
Administrative Law Judge Beth Scheetz had originally approved Diers's request for aid, saying that derogatory comments about "blacks and foreigners" were commonplace at the commercial washer and dryer manufacturing plant where Diers worked.
“Since President Trump’s election, it was common for workers to talk about hating blacks or hating foreigners,” Scheetz wrote in her ruling. “If management wishes all workers to be treated with respect, it must enforce respectful treatment amongst co-workers and supervisors, and apply those expectations consistently throughout the chain of command."
Diers testified at her unemployment hearing that she was frustrated by a co-worker “dancing and singing Mexican” early in the morning before Cinco de Mayo. Diers acknowledged that she hated "f---ing Mexicans" in front of several coworkers.
The newspaper reported that Diers later tried to clarify that she meant she only hated “illegal Mexicans.”
“We talk about everything out on the floor — whether it’s the president or the vice president,” Diers testified. “There has been talk on the floor: Some people don’t like blacks, certain people don’t like Mexicans, certain people don’t like foreigners. We talk, and then we just move on.”
Diers reportedly told Scheetz that rhetoric against African-Americans and immigrants intensified since Trump took office.
“There was a lot of controversy out on the floor during the presidential election,” she testified.
Iowa's Employment Appeals Board, however, ruled that Diers was clearly violating the company’s definition of misconduct and reversed Scheetz’s decision on the woman's unemployment claim.
“Her clarification that she only meant ‘illegal’ Mexicans does not absolve her of culpability,” the board wrote, according to The Register.
The appeals board denied Dier's appeal for a rehearing on Monday, a spokesperson from the Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals told The Hill.
Diers has said she plans to appeal the board's decision denying her jobless benefits, moving the case to district court, The Register reported.
There is not protection of free speech by private entities.
Only the State is under that law.
Interesting that you should post that.
This was the beginning of the effort to make Illegals acceptable.
Speedy Gonzales was smarter as well as faster than the Cat.
Speedy does seem to have been an illegal, unlike earlier Hispanics like Zorro, the Cisco Kid, Ricky Ricardo, Lupe Velez, etc.
The ‘65 immigration reform act ruined everything.
I was an employer for 38 years. I seldom fired anyone. Getting them to quit on their own was better. .
Zorro was no illegal or even an immigrant since Spain still owned California.
He was always up against some corrupt Royal official or the Governor. He was fighting the Deep State even then.
Where there's smoke, there's fire. If President Trump is aware of this incident, I would hope he would instruct ICE to raid the plant. What's the point of repatriating our factories from Mexico if we are bringing the Mexicans along for the ride?
Isn’t it the state that makes the decision?
In Pennsylvania anyway (maybe it’s different now), if someone was fired for cause and then claimed unemployment, the employer could fight it - however the state government (dang, was it a judge or a bureaucrat? I forget..) decides whether or not the person gets unemployment.
That’s true, there is some sort of hearing. And the employer and employee each get to state their case. I don’t remember what entity it is, but it makes sense it would be the state because the state is paying the money.
Yep! Move them to the graveyard shift at 10% reduced pay with the additional duties of trash collection and restroom cleaning...If there is no union involved...
PLEASE CITE MY POST AND SHOW HIW IT IS INCORRECT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.