While the author is clearly a Q skeptic, the argument he purveys is, in my view, cogent. Take it as you will
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: pluvmantelo
“Graham Cluley (born 8 April 1969) is a British security blogger and the author of grahamcluley.com, a daily blog on the latest computer security news, opinion, and advice.”
Why should I believe this guy?
2 posted on
08/15/2018 6:46:32 PM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: pluvmantelo
QAnon conspiracy theory, which - amongst other things - believes that there is a huge undiscovered paedophile ring run by the powerful liberal elite. There is.
...also, I don't think amongst is a word.
3 posted on
08/15/2018 6:49:46 PM PDT by
Eddie01
To: pluvmantelo; admin
Would sure like to see these pro/anti Q articles limited to the Q thread.
5 posted on
08/15/2018 6:56:18 PM PDT by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: pluvmantelo
The Q Internet-fantasy-sharing cult, like all cults, is immune to outside criticism.
6 posted on
08/15/2018 6:57:39 PM PDT by
Dagnabitt
To: pluvmantelo
"...just mashing their keyboard like a crazy man. Enter the bat-shit crazy QAnon conspiracy theory..." I thought those two sentence fragments went together particularly well.
8 posted on
08/15/2018 7:01:11 PM PDT by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
To: pluvmantelo
9 posted on
08/15/2018 7:02:05 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: pluvmantelo; SkyPilot; unkus; bitt; hoosiermama; Thank You Rush; ZULU; NFHale; vette6387; ...
The thousands of Q followers online digging Marxist RAT dirt 24/7 is what the Marxist RATs are and should be nervous about.
To: pluvmantelo
Mark Burnett all of his so called intelligence couldn’t pull off Q if his life depended on it. And anyone who thinks what Q writes is random nonsense is either severely dishonest or else they have never studied Q. In this case I will say the guy is dishonest.
21 posted on
08/15/2018 7:18:48 PM PDT by
Revel
To: pluvmantelo
“While the author is clearly a Q skeptic, the argument he purveys is, in my view, cogent. Take it as you will”
What’s the argument?
22 posted on
08/15/2018 7:27:12 PM PDT by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: pluvmantelo
His argument is cryptographic gibberish.
24 posted on
08/15/2018 7:30:25 PM PDT by
sourcery
(Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
To: pluvmantelo
The Cat is on the Roof.
His name is QWERTY, but you can call him Q.
He drives an Aston Martin and only drinks Martini’s that are shaken, not stirred.
25 posted on
08/15/2018 7:30:30 PM PDT by
Kickass Conservative
(The way Liberals carry on about Deportation, you would think "Mexico" was Spanish for "Auschwitz".)
To: pluvmantelo
The author is a TDS sufferer, and as such a) his arguments can be dismissed without even listening to them, and b) have no place here.
Q skeptic myself but I’m not getting decision data from the lefty cult.
27 posted on
08/15/2018 7:32:14 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 1)
To: pluvmantelo
Just for starters: Q has never explained what those “stringers,” as he calls them, are actually for. He’s never even said they’re encrypted messages. For all we know, they’re only there to confuse the deep state’s bots that scan message boards.
31 posted on
08/15/2018 7:38:58 PM PDT by
sourcery
(Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
To: pluvmantelo
32 posted on
08/15/2018 7:43:47 PM PDT by
dinodino
To: pluvmantelo
“Bad news conspiracy theorists. QAnon codes are just a guy mashing his keyboard”
...just what the want us to think.
43 posted on
08/15/2018 8:21:12 PM PDT by
BobL
(I drive a pick up truck because it makes me feel like a man)
To: pluvmantelo
46 posted on
08/15/2018 8:28:55 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
("Nature, Mr. Allnut, is what we are put in this world to rise above.")
To: pluvmantelo
Enter the bat-shit crazy QAnon conspiracy theory, which - amongst other things - believes that there is a huge undiscovered paedophile ring run by the powerful liberal elite.Thinking there's a huge pedo ring run by the powerful liberal elite is *bat-shit crazy*?
Someone is out to cover their behind. Or someone else's.
52 posted on
08/15/2018 8:42:28 PM PDT by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith......)
To: pluvmantelo
I don’t believe anything the media says about Q.
85 posted on
08/16/2018 12:53:47 AM PDT by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death by cults.)
To: pluvmantelo
Always figured Q was just WhitehouseInsider with a slightly new shtick.
To: pluvmantelo
Hmm, I’ve not followed any of Qanon’s work. I did however, recognize the left-right-hand typing in the code. I looked at that before reading the article.
I am no expert on passwords.... and even I could see that flaw here with only knowing the prompt ‘guy banging on his keyboard’.
90 posted on
08/16/2018 5:37:04 AM PDT by
VaeVictis
(~Woe to the Conquered~)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
