Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote
▶Q !CbboFOtcZs 08/03/18 (Fri) 11:09:53 d51ef9 (1) No.2430708

Full attack mode.

Washington Post leading?

[Sample Past 5hrs]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2018/08/03/this-is-the-moment-how-a-wave-of-media-coverage-gave-qanon-conspiracy-theorists-their-best-week-ever/?utm_term=.cf4f4e0f506c

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/08/03/theres-a-virus-in-trumpland/?utm_term=.73cb6867bf8c

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2018/08/03/qanon-meet-a-real-life-believer-in-the-online-pro-trump-conspiracy-theory-thats-bursting-into-view/?utm_term=.1c12101c8280

Who owns the Washington Post?

Amazon?

What ABC agency is heavily tied to Amazon?

https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-web-services-launches-secret-region-2017-11

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-20/cia-tech-official-calls-amazon-cloud-project-transformational

Q

790 posted on 08/03/2018 8:14:57 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 786 | View Replies ]


To: b4its2late
A URL tidbit, just for the curious. Notice many of those URLs end with "?utm_term= ..."? That material is not necessary, and in fact is a bit of a security risk, as the host of the article can use that to trace back through webserver logs, who grabbed the URL.

I know you are simply copy the Q-drop, but it gives an opportunity to pass along the fact that the "utm_term" is a property of the exact instance of a browser, not the server.

800 posted on 08/03/2018 8:29:52 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 790 | View Replies ]

To: b4its2late; ransomnote; Steven W.; greeneyes; TEXOKIE; txhurl; saywhatagain; Swordmaker; MNDude; ...

Possibly related. Listening to MSM yesterday talking about Google preparing its censored search engine for China. A few years back they made a big deal about NOT being willing to compromise their “purity” by doing this. But now it’s ok.

My theory: They were never remotely “pure” or “non-evil”. The whole China thing was just a gigantic head fake to make people think they were trustworthy, that they didn’t adjust their results to favor DS and suppress conservative results.

Not sure what is going on now. Perhaps they are in need of revenue because Trump’s CIA is no longer funding them? Or is there another angle I’m missing?


802 posted on 08/03/2018 8:30:35 AM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 790 | View Replies ]

To: b4its2late

I notice I cannot open any of the links without disabling adblocker or paying $. WaPo didn’t used to be like that, not Business Insider.


812 posted on 08/03/2018 8:49:55 AM PDT by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 790 | View Replies ]

To: b4its2late

*****!

(good grab! I’m still reading last night’s!)


850 posted on 08/03/2018 9:51:20 AM PDT by bitt (We know not what course others may take, but as for me, Give me Liberty, or Give me Death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 790 | View Replies ]

To: b4its2late

Thank you for pinging me. I don’t know HOW I missed it! I must not have read all my account posts. Good to know you were on duty this morning to help us keep up with the Q drops. :)


853 posted on 08/03/2018 9:57:02 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 790 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson