Full attack mode.
Washington Post leading?
[Sample Past 5hrs]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2018/08/03/this-is-the-moment-how-a-wave-of-media-coverage-gave-qanon-conspiracy-theorists-their-best-week-ever/?utm_term=.cf4f4e0f506c
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/08/03/theres-a-virus-in-trumpland/?utm_term=.73cb6867bf8c
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2018/08/03/qanon-meet-a-real-life-believer-in-the-online-pro-trump-conspiracy-theory-thats-bursting-into-view/?utm_term=.1c12101c8280
Who owns the Washington Post?
Amazon?
What ABC agency is heavily tied to Amazon?
https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-web-services-launches-secret-region-2017-11
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-20/cia-tech-official-calls-amazon-cloud-project-transformational
Q
I know you are simply copy the Q-drop, but it gives an opportunity to pass along the fact that the "utm_term" is a property of the exact instance of a browser, not the server.
Possibly related. Listening to MSM yesterday talking about Google preparing its censored search engine for China. A few years back they made a big deal about NOT being willing to compromise their “purity” by doing this. But now it’s ok.
My theory: They were never remotely “pure” or “non-evil”. The whole China thing was just a gigantic head fake to make people think they were trustworthy, that they didn’t adjust their results to favor DS and suppress conservative results.
Not sure what is going on now. Perhaps they are in need of revenue because Trump’s CIA is no longer funding them? Or is there another angle I’m missing?
I notice I cannot open any of the links without disabling adblocker or paying $. WaPo didn’t used to be like that, not Business Insider.
*****!
(good grab! I’m still reading last night’s!)
Thank you for pinging me. I don’t know HOW I missed it! I must not have read all my account posts. Good to know you were on duty this morning to help us keep up with the Q drops. :)