[Cboldt]

A URL tidbit, just for the curious. Notice many of those URLs end with "?utm_term= ..."? That material is not necessary, and in fact is a bit of a security risk, as the host of the article can use that to trace back through webserver logs, who grabbed the URL.

I know you are simply copy the Q-drop, but it gives an opportunity to pass along the fact that the "utm_term" is a property of the exact instance of a browser, not the server.

[Steven W.]

Good observation & I have thought the same thing - the attributes are often there and never removed by “Q”. The values can be anything, though - and I’ve often wondered why anons haven’t searched using those though most likely they are true points of origin (which is a possibly unintended exposure)

[Hostage]

Interesting. I tried it by deleting the “?utm_term= ...” portion. The article came up but inserted a new “?utm_term= ...” ending. In fact, it does this each time so yes, it’s logging each access.

Example:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/08/03/theres-a-virus-in-trumpland/?utm_term=.73cb6867bf8c

I would infer, however, based on Q’s previous posts showing knowledge of cybersecurity, that Q is accessing behind some sort of VPN or higher level security such as perhaps a ‘packet hopping’ encoder. From my SBI clearance days in satellite security, there are levels of DOD security that not even CIA knows.

[b4its2late]

Gotcha. My screw up. Sorry

[DAVEY CROCKETT]

Hey did.you see that old southern classic to kill a mockingbird? I must have watched it 10 times. Ok I am seeing things FITFLOL maybe it’s that red pill. LOL

If mockingbird reference is to msm, Gergory Peck is Session. Is this how the Q personal are giving clues?

I could be horribly wrong but it works. I am getting this Q personal, I think.

And I still don’t have a link, friends to Q.