feh...What kind of drivel is this? It doesn’t even make any sense.
Rabid delusional hatred. It’s all they’ve got.
NYT: “All the fake news that they see fit to print.”
NYT in October 2016:
Why Hillary would win with 330 EV’s and Trump has no chance.
“...the help from Russia...”
Pure TDS.
The leftist has Fauxcohantas, of all people, beating Trump.
These people are crazy:
Marty
Pacific Northwest|20m ago
When will Dems learn that winning the presidency is not about policy, personality, left vs center, establishment vs “outsider”, or any other aspect of a given candidate? When will they learn it’s not about the candidate at all? It’s about the voters, and not their numbers (we clearly have more of them than does the GOP) but their location (location, location). Why not take some of the bazillion dollars that it costs to run a presidential campaign, and use it to put some of our voters where they need to be? Imagine, those 5 million “extra” California voters distributed across Mich, Ohio, Fla, NC, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania? Find voters who can afford to temporarily relocate (retired, otherwise not working or with kids in school), fund the costs of their move, and never again lose a presidential election.
In exactly the same way Trump lost the election in 2016.
Jeez!
Mark
feh...TDS is a real thing. I suspect that this author has been in for treatments.
More leftist delusional fantasy in progress.
It’s the only way they can cope day to day.
Someone else is already ahead of them.
MAGA 2020 & Beyond - a pro-Trump scifi anthology
https://www.amazon.com/MAGA-2020-Beyond-Milo-Yiannopoulos-ebook/dp/B075YF99P4
Bill Clinton never got 50% of the vote either.
President-Elect Elizabeth Warren?
This is one of the most delusional opinion pieces I’ve read.
This looks like wishful thinking from the bubble of leftist journalism.
Isn’t this the same newspaper that had a crying fir because President Trump called them out for being Fake News? Truth hurts. Deal!
In Progs’ fever dreams. In reality, Trump WILL be re-elected, unless there is a bloody war. Maybe even then.
“Mrs. Clinton’s chance of losing is about the same as the probability that an N.F.L. kicker misses a 37-yard field goal.”
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html
“The Upshot’s elections model suggests that Hillary Clinton is favored to win the presidency, based on the latest state and national polls. A victory by Mr. Trump remains possible: Mrs. Clinton’s chance of losing is about the same as the probability that an N.F.L. kicker misses a 37-yard field goal.”
...