Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem Panic: Page May Seek Immunity Deal To Come Clean on Strzok, McCabe, Even Comey
https://www.westernjournal.com ^ | BENJAMIN ARIE JULY 18, 2018 AT 2:37PM

Posted on 07/19/2018 5:29:01 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK

The old trope of “good cop, bad cop” may be getting a twist, and it’s no doubt making Democrats nervous.

Call Peter Strzok the bad cop. The embattled FBI investigator already showed a strong political bias that almost certainly influenced his judgment on inquiries into both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump … and he’s now facing serious questions and a loss of his security clearance as a result.

He put on the bad cop act again during his recent testimony to Congress, where Strzok acted aloof and uncooperative as lawmakers tried to determine if FBI officials purposely tried to undermine the candidacy — and then presidency — of Donald Trump.

Now, fellow FBI employee Lisa Page may have a chance to play good cop and take a much more cooperative route.

The government attorney who was having an affair with the married Strzok was on the receiving end of many of his anti-Trump text messages and had an inside view into potentially widespread bias and political scheming within the bureau.

Experts including Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch believe Page may be willing to cut a deal that gives her leeway to unload the truth about what went on behind the FBI’s doors.

“Well, I think Page has the opportunity to become the anti-Strzok,” Farrell explained during a Monday appearance on Fox Business Network’s “Lou Dobbs Tonight.”

“She’s going to look for an immunity deal, or at least being treated as a cooperating witness,” the legal expert continued.

By simply cooperating with a congressional panel, Page would take a very different approach than the man she was constantly texting, and that could spell disaster for liberals if Trump’s claims of widespread Department of Justice corruption are true.

“She’s seen from last week what her boyfriend was doing, and she’s probably a pretty sharp attorney. She sees an opportunity or an opening to kind of recast herself, and I think she’s taking advantage of it,” Farrell said.

He may be right on target with that assessment. Page already has spoken to several members of Congress regarding the scandal, and while those discussions were not public, participants hinted that the FBI attorney was indeed more forthcoming than Strzok.

Republican Rep. Mark Meadows of North Carolina, for instance, told reporters on Friday that Page’s “willingness to cooperate today speaks well of her.”

Another Republican lawmaker, Rep. John Ratcliffe of Texas, echoed that tone and said he believes Page is “a very forthcoming witness.”

“She gave us a lot of new information that we didn’t have before. That will lead us to ask for some more people to make some more requests for information we do not yet have,” Ratcliffe said.

The fact that GOP lawmakers were frustrated with Strzok’s evasive testimony but downright positive about Page’s cooperation does not bode well for Democrats. If she does strike an immunity deal that lets her dish on FBI insiders, figures like Andrew McCabe and James Comey could be hardest hit.

Even Barack Obama‘s reputation — what’s left of it, at least — could be on the chopping block.

As Farrell pointed out on Fox Business, there is evidence that the former president himself has his fingerprints on the “undermine Trump” scandal.

“There’s an earlier text message from Page where she says, ‘POTUS wants to know everything we’re doing,'” the legal expert reminded viewers.

“How much more evidence do we need? At what point does Mr. Obama come out of hiding and offer his version of the facts? That’s my question,” Farrell said. “All the hysteria over (Russian) hacking was all on Obama’s watch. Where’s the accountability? I want him deposed.”

Only time will tell if Page’s testimony lives up to that hype, but she has everything to gain and nothing to lose by cooperating with Congress. If Farrell is right, Page could be the key to unlocking our generation’s version of Watergate … with Obama playing the role of Richard Nixon.


TOPICS: Education; History; Reference
KEYWORDS: lisapage; trumprussia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2018 5:29:01 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Hell hath no fury....


2 posted on 07/19/2018 5:33:01 PM PDT by kimoajax (Rack'em & Stack'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Still we’ll not see the left’s ship sinking for real until the bodies start piling up. But this is a fair start.


3 posted on 07/19/2018 5:35:47 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (screanigng t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Better give her 24/7 security or she will die in a mysterious accident before she can cooperate.


4 posted on 07/19/2018 5:36:07 PM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

These FBI employees are all subject to Lie detector tests. Wonder when the last time Comey took one.


5 posted on 07/19/2018 5:36:26 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

The real question is, can anybody wake Jeff Sessions?


6 posted on 07/19/2018 5:37:22 PM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

This better not be more foreplay with no consumption. Recent, previous immunity deals crafted by Comey in the Hillary Servergate case yielded absolutely NOTHING! Otherwise this will be nothing but chafe-laden masturbation.


7 posted on 07/19/2018 5:37:34 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK; Liz

AND put all of the FBI agents wanting to testify in line behind Lisa Page.


8 posted on 07/19/2018 5:37:47 PM PDT by Libloather (Trivial Pursuit question - name the first female to lose TWO presidential elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Congress can pull a Mueller. Fink no prosecution.


9 posted on 07/19/2018 5:39:26 PM PDT by amihow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

One thing I noticed about Page...to me she appeared to be better looking than she did from the time she was with Strzok, McCabe, Comey, et al. Maybe because she’s away from that concentration of MALIGNANT EVIL.


10 posted on 07/19/2018 5:40:29 PM PDT by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt

Has anyone seen Jeff...

...or John McCain?


11 posted on 07/19/2018 5:40:44 PM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
DCDCC46_F_9_E23_41_F1_B1_DB_795_AB00_D019_F
12 posted on 07/19/2018 5:42:20 PM PDT by CaliforniaCraftBeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

“[when does] Obama come out of hiding and offer his version of the facts?”

There is a simple four letter word for Obama’s version — “lies.”


13 posted on 07/19/2018 5:42:24 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

I hate these stories that include the word “may” in them. I don’t care until “may” becomes “has”.


14 posted on 07/19/2018 5:44:23 PM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Bombshell in 5, 4, 3, 2, .........


15 posted on 07/19/2018 5:44:26 PM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

Yep, she is in real danger. Crossing Bill, Hillary, Obama, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Holder, Lynch...and probably Brennan and Clapper as well. Not good people to have gunning for you.


16 posted on 07/19/2018 5:44:52 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Strzok gave himself away when he brought up the Khizer Kahn incident calling it an extremely offensive and digusting attack on a military family by Trump which is how only a far left radical nut would describe it. The guy Kahn was shaking the constitution at the TV screen trying to push this insane BS that the constitution says we must import foreign radical Muslims. Trump merely asked why Kahns wife didn’t talk and that is disgusting and offensive? No asswad, Kahn was the disgusting one using his sons death and honor to help a crook who respects the military about as much as she respects dog spit no to mention push crap that would get Americans killed.


17 posted on 07/19/2018 5:45:30 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Vox populi, vox dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

What happened to Priestap? Sundance was 100% convinced he was the warbling canary.


18 posted on 07/19/2018 5:45:35 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

“Consumption?”

Tuberculosis?

(Sorry, couldn’t resist :-)


19 posted on 07/19/2018 5:45:39 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kimoajax

Will her form of testimony be 10,000 text message exchanges?


20 posted on 07/19/2018 5:45:47 PM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson