Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top 10 Reasons Why Desktop Linux Failed
Datamation ^ | 11 July 2018 | Matt Hartley

Posted on 07/12/2018 6:56:39 AM PDT by ShadowAce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

1 posted on 07/12/2018 6:56:39 AM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; JosephW; Only1choice____Freedom; amigatec; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...

2 posted on 07/12/2018 6:57:13 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Security is another reason... Linux is the most widely used and widely exploited OS.

-I work everyday with 17,000 physical RHEL servers with multiple VM's each...
3 posted on 07/12/2018 7:06:46 AM PDT by TexasGunLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
A lot of valid reasons here. #7 is a big one. Most companies adopt equipment their IT departments are familiar with. The IT people are usually gamers, and gaming is done on Windows. So they know windows.

Another big reason: Active Directory Domain Services. You simply do not get the same kind of centralized management of your workstations in your company on Linux that you can get with AD. Any solution that would give you a similar level of admin-level management would likely be custom built and expensive.
4 posted on 07/12/2018 7:08:52 AM PDT by JamesP81 (Traitors are more dangerous than enemies. Vote and act accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

1. Installation ... 2. Installation, ... 10. Installation.


5 posted on 07/12/2018 7:09:19 AM PDT by Fhios (♫ Oh Where have you been Jeffy boy Jeffy boy oh where have you been charming Jeffy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Linux is the most popular os in the world.

Because of Android smartphones. Desktop not so much.


6 posted on 07/12/2018 7:09:54 AM PDT by sloanrb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
Another big reason: Active Directory Domain Services.

All of our Linux servers are fully integrated into AD.

7 posted on 07/12/2018 7:10:23 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

Most linux distros are easier to install than Windows.


8 posted on 07/12/2018 7:11:35 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Add in VirtualBox for using favorite legacy Windoz Apps onn tgheir native best version of legacy Windows.


9 posted on 07/12/2018 7:11:41 AM PDT by Paladin2 (no spelchek, no problem...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

Interesting. I also work with multiple thousands of servers. I have never had a security issue.


10 posted on 07/12/2018 7:12:37 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

RedHat expects YOU, the administrator, to secure the server.
They don’t know your org or needs.


11 posted on 07/12/2018 7:12:55 AM PDT by afterhoursarmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sloanrb

Even if every Android phone disappeared today, Linux would still be the most widely used OS.


12 posted on 07/12/2018 7:13:25 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
9) Linux distros vary in quality

In my opinion, its the fact that there are countless number of distros which create market fragmentation and thus confusion. There is no such thing as Linux on the desk top. There is linux running ubuntu or fedora or whatever.

Microsoft has Windows. It may be home or enterprise but its the same OS, just with features turned off so it works the same.

Almost all of those other problems would be solved if there was a big enough market for software and hardware developers to give linux more attention but the market doesn't grow big enough because of the fragmentation and confusion.

13 posted on 07/12/2018 7:13:43 AM PDT by ProudGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Fear and Ignorance are the primary issues here.


14 posted on 07/12/2018 7:15:38 AM PDT by beef ( middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sloanrb

Yep, and since the desktop is slowly disappearing no one much cares. Let Google make zero profit from Android and Chrome.


15 posted on 07/12/2018 7:16:35 AM PDT by bigbob (Trust Sessions. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

bkmk


16 posted on 07/12/2018 7:16:47 AM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

In short, it doesn’t do what Windows does.

After decades of development.

It will always be a techie world, great (even superior) to Windows in the things that it does for interwebs and servers, but it has always been like a Caterpillar Tractor (Linux) when people want a Ford Truck (Windows) or a Range Rover (Apple/Mac)


17 posted on 07/12/2018 7:16:55 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

It’s a fair and obviously well-informed column although he rationalizes nearly every shortcoming. ‘It’s good but...’

In my view Linux has always struggled a bit from a lack of a dominant player synonymous with the OS. Red Hat might be a real or perceived brand leader but while enthusiasts might enthuse about this or that distro it is, as the column suggests, absolutely bewildering to someone who might very well be interested in an secure, stable Windows alternative but who gets slammed with choices and vagaries as soon as they walk in the door.

Microsoft support is, in a word, abysmal. Like Apple, they save billions by essentially throwing support cases to the wolves - or, in this case, the other users. Incredibly, many Windows/Microsoft end users, MVPs or otherwise, are willing to help out - for free - and their help is almost always faster, more accurate and clearer than anything offered up by Microsoft employees (*wink wink*) who are, too often, non-native English speakers usually in India. Their ‘help’ is often a series of useless links, outdated information, attempts to fend off the query and general bureaucratic box-ticking uselessness. They simply don’t know their own product. However, because Windows is Microsoft and Microsoft is Windows at least there’s a single point of gathering for exchange of info (thousands of independent forums notwithstanding).

The Linux community are knowledgeable to a fault but they are also often prickly, impatient and demanding bordering on hostile. Requests for layman-caliber information are often greeted with the equivalent of STFU Noob or a flood of indecipherable jargon. Linux users are strong advocates for their OS but their manners are often lacking.


18 posted on 07/12/2018 7:18:15 AM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Top 10 Reasons Why Desktop Linux Failed

Lousy marketing ... average person-in-the-street still doesn't know what Linux is, but they know Windows


19 posted on 07/12/2018 7:18:23 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProudGOP
Microsoft has Windows. It may be home or enterprise but its the same OS, just with features turned off so it works the same.

Linux is the same--all those distros use basically the same kernel.

The differences are what the distro developers put into each distro. Those are the "features" that are being turned off or on. ne distro may use Gnome, and another may use KDE. Same OS underneath, but different desktops, with different features. The difference is that the end user *can* install whatever desktop or feature s/he wants, without being dependent on the distributor.

The biggest difference (as I see it) is that most end users do not want the responsibility of freedom. They'd rather be told how to configure their machine and then bend to how the computer works, rather than the other way around.

20 posted on 07/12/2018 7:20:59 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson