|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posted on 07/07/2018 10:04:09 PM PDT by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan” YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction YouTube Thoughts Not Bots Who is Q - 4 min - quick overview Article Conservative Treehouse Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction Anonymous The Book of Q - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary “Pay Attention” Thread Qanon.pub Q drops - created by Q on Q’s 8chan board “The Truth Is Spreading” Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference “Power to the People” YouTube Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drops YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links ImperatorRex Includes Q-drop reactions Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More” YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected - 6 min Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
blu, can you explain further. Very interesting.
Ordered some Q T-shirt’s from Amazon.
Quite a few nice designs on there.
Will be wearing them out next week and see if I can’t get a reaction of start a conversation.
For the record, I am not 100% convinced of the whole Q Phenomenon but I do find it interesting and the trolling is disconcerting.
He had been working on an expose of some sort of Brennan. He had also told his girlfriend the day before that he thought the FBI was messing with his car.
That was adorable. Thanks for sharing it.
Should have added - so he decided to get out of town and was heading to the airport when his car crashed.
A better “Plan”—Sign the petition:
Spread it around! Per WH petition policy, it’s hidden until it hits 150, but then gets moved to the main petition page. And it will take off. Up to 126 now!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Up to 140 now!
This analysis may provide you some insight:
Your petition is extremely misguided. No one should sign it. Trust Sessions. Trust Wray.
Good question, ping me if there’s an answer!
I feel for you; I lost my 3 cats in the last year and a half, they were 13 and 14 years old.
I miss them every day.
My solace is I know that they continued their journeys.
Hmmm
Wrong-Way Driver in Head-On Collision Closed I-66: Secret Service
...A uniformed Secret Service officer noticed a driver travelling the wrong way on I Street Northwest in Washington, D.C. about 4:35 a.m. Sunday.
The Secret Service has not identified the injured indidivuals. The Secret Service says neither White House security nor any protectee was impacted.
A description of the suspect has not yet been released.
The Secret Service did not immediately detail why they were on the scene.
54 posted on 7/8/2018, 8:43:44 AM by StormFlag
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
StormFlag, you are right! This definitely goes under the heading of things that make you go
HHHHHhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmm.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_18
...Unless a statute or these rules permit otherwise, the government must prosecute an offense in a district where the offense was committed. The court must set the place of trial within the district with due regard for the convenience of the defendant, any victim, and the witnesses, and the prompt administration of justice...
... The Constitution of the United States, Article III. Section 2, Paragraph 3, provides:
The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed...
That photo reminds me of Tigtig. Could be him, easily.
Should have read down the thread, got the answer.
And then what about criminals who committed crimes that occurred in many locations.
Here are the deets n that case. If anyone wants to know how a real investigation goes, read this;
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-fbi-agent-and-alleged-co-conspirators-indicted-scheme-obstruct-federal-fraud
Former FBI Agent and Alleged Co-Conspirators Indicted for Scheme to Obstruct Federal Fraud Investigation
WASHINGTON – A federal grand jury in Salt Lake City today returned an 11-count indictment charging a former FBI special agent and two alleged accomplices with a scheme to use the agent’s official position to derail a federal investigation into the conduct of one of the alleged conspirators. The charges were announced by Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney for the District of Utah David B. Barlow and Department of Justice Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz.
The indictment charges former FBI special agent Robert G. Lustyik Jr., 50, of Sleepy Hollow, N.Y.; Michael L. Taylor, 51, of Harvard, Mass., the principal of Boston-based American International Security Corporation (AISC); and Johannes W. Thaler, 49, of New Fairfield, Conn., each with one count of conspiracy, eight counts of honest services wire fraud, one count of obstructing justice and one count of obstructing an agency proceeding.
“According to the indictment, while active in the FBI, former Special Agent Lustyik used his position in an attempt to stave off the criminal investigation of a business partner with whom he was pursuing lucrative security and energy contracts,” said Assistant Attorney General Breuer. “He allegedly acted through a childhood friend to secure promises of cash, purported medical expenses and business proceeds in exchange for abusing his position as an FBI agent. The alleged conduct is outrageous, and we will do everything we can to ensure that justice is done in this case.”
DOJ Inspector General Horowitz stated: “Law enforcement officers are sworn to uphold the law. Agents who would sell their badges and impede the administration of justice will be vigorously pursued.”
According to the indictment, Robert Lustyik was an FBI special agent until September 2012, assigned to counterintelligence work in White Plains, N.Y. The indictment also states that from at least June 2011, the three alleged conspirators had a business relationship involving the pursuit of contracts for security services, electric power and energy development, among other things, in the Middle East, Africa and elsewhere.
The indictment alleges that in September 2011, Taylor learned of a federal criminal investigation, begun in Utah in 2010, into whether Taylor, his business and others committed fraud in the award and performance of a contract with the U.S. Department of Defense.
Soon thereafter, Taylor allegedly began to give and offer things of value to Lustyik in exchange for Lustyik’s agreement to use his official position to impair and impede the Utah investigation. The indictment also alleges that Thaler, a childhood friend of Lustyik’s, served as a conduit between Taylor and Lustyik, passing information and things of value.
Specifically, the indictment charges that Taylor offered Lustyik a $200,000 cash payment; money purportedly for the medical expenses of Lustyik’s minor child; and a share in the proceeds of several anticipated contracts worth millions of dollars.
According to the indictment, Lustyik used his official FBI position to impede the Utah investigation by, among other things, designating Taylor as an FBI confidential source, texting and calling the Utah investigators and prosecutors to dissuade them from charging Taylor and attempting to interview potential witnesses and targets in the Utah investigation. As alleged in the indictment, Lustyik wrote to Taylor that he was going to interview one of Taylor’s co-defendants and “blow the doors off this thing.” Referring to the Utah investigation, Lustyik also allegedly assured Taylor that he would not stop in his “attempt to sway this your way.”
According to the indictment, Lustyik, Taylor and Thaler attempted to conceal the full extent of Lustyik’s relationship with Taylor from the Utah prosecutors and agents, including by making and planning to make material misrepresentations and omissions to federal law enforcement involved in the investigation of Taylor.
For example, the indictment alleges that on Sept. 8, 2012, after Taylor was searched at the border and his computer seized, Lustyik sent a text message to Thaler, stating: “You might have to save me and testify that only you r doing business.” Nine days later, according to the indictment, Thaler told federal law enforcement agents – in a voluntary, recorded interview – that Lustyik was not involved in Taylor’s and Thaler’s business.
The pair also allegedly used an email “dead drop” to avoid leaving a record of their interactions and used the names of football teams and nicknames as part of their coded communications.
Taylor and Lustyik were both previously arrested on prior criminal complaints in this case. Taylor has been detained pending trial and Lustyik received a $2 million bond. Thaler is expected to surrender to authorities tomorrow.
If convicted, the defendants each face a maximum potential penalty of five years in prison on the conspiracy charge, 20 years in prison on each of the wire fraud charges, 10 years in prison on the obstruction of justice charge and five years in prison on the obstruction of an agency proceeding charge. Each charge also carries a maximum $250,000 fine, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense. The indictment also seeks forfeiture of any proceeds traceable to the conspiracy, wire fraud and obstruction of justice offenses.
The case is being investigated by the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General and prosecuted by Trial Attorneys Kevin Driscoll and Maria Lerner of the Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section; Acting Deputy Chief Pamela Hicks, Acting Assistant Deputy Chief Jeannette Gunderson and Trial Attorney Ann Marie Blaylock of the Criminal Division’s Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section; and Assistant U.S. Attorney Carlos Esqueda.
The charges and allegations contained in the indictment are merely accusations and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
Gen, you just made me think of something. Didn’t that hunky actor Paul Walker die in a bad car crash that wasn’t explained? And didn’t he do some really good work in some children’s charity? He used his celebrity for a good cause as I remember and he was just a good guy.
Cats reporting. Cat dragging to commence hence.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
LOL! just don’t bruise the fruit!
Looking forward to the day’s finds, Cat’s PJs!
why that’s when you bring in RICO Rudy
Saturday evening on Fox News Channel’s ‘Justice with Jeanine Pirro’ former NYC mayor Rudy Giuliani suggested that a grand jury already has enough evidence, from WikiLeaks and the FBI, to charge “Clinton Incorporated” with racketeering under the RICO laws that were originally designed to go after the mafia.
“I was shocked, back in July,” Giuliani said about FBI Director James Comey’s recommendation against charges for Clinton. “He laid out almost a prosecutorial memo and then came to a conclusion that he shouldn’t come to—that the Justice Department should—that she shouldn’t be indicted.”
“A special prosecutor should be appointed. A special prosecutor —a non-Republican, non-Democrat— should redo this whole investigation. And Obama should be requred to promise he is not going to pardon any of these Clinton Incorporated— I think it’s a racketeering enterprise honestly,” he said.
The rules grant wider discretion.
“...28 U.S.C. 114 [now 1393, 1441], supra, numerous statutes have been enacted to regulate the venue of criminal proceedings, particularly in respect to continuing offenses and offenses consisting of several transactions occurring in different districts...”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
