Q Anon: 6/29/18 FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops

LOL! Hubby and I used to fantasize about a children’s version of Maxwell’s silver hammer...all it would do is make the boys stay in their beds and GO TO SLEEP!

1,301 posted on 07/01/2018 9:01:37 PM PDT by blu (WWG1WGA)

To: Unrepentant VN Vet; All

Just look how unhappy the libs are. It’s all outrage, all the time. You can’t be happy if you are constantly agitated. It’s unhealthy. It makes you look like a wacko. Yet they go nuts on social media, they go nuts at awards shows, and they go nuts when conservatives are trying to scarf down some tacos. If you are always going nuts, maybe that’s an indicator that you are nuts. - Kurt Schlicter

1,302 posted on 07/01/2018 9:02:33 PM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)

To: little jeremiah

And not just psych profiles - how about habits of threats to do bodily harm or kill others, and violent behavior?

Well, that would be the type of "psych profile" I was referring to. Any bozo that gets busted for committing an unprovoked assault should be evaluated for consideration.

Same for child molesters and wife beaters.

1,303 posted on 07/01/2018 9:09:25 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (The Obama is about to hit the fan.)

To All, what if trust the plan is WW? What if When the shoe drops here it drops in China, Russia, India, Saudi Arabia? What if the cabal slave markets screech to a halt in one swoop?
Think Bigly!
No Sex Toys
No Adrenochrome
No organ donors
No fresh blood
No stem cells
Etc, Etc.........

POTUS and new friends(?) starve the DS/cabal/satanists, will they sit still or come unglued and be forced from dark into light?

This may very well be bigger than we think!

Trust the Plan! MAGA! Winning Bigly! WWG1WGA!

1,304 posted on 07/01/2018 9:09:58 PM PDT by Billyv ( Ephesians 6:11 for we battle not against flesh and blood...Pray for our leaders and nation!)

It’s kinda like a serial, more frequent than once a week, but there is a participation element, like those murder mystery parties. And there are some murders involved in this mystery, along with many other crimes.

1,305 posted on 07/01/2018 9:15:55 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)

I’m not particular on the method.

In the Revolution, they hung spies (Nathan Hale and the British guy we caught) because it was considered a dishonorable way to die. Firing squads were for those who were to be executed with honor, like regular deserters.

1,306 posted on 07/01/2018 9:21:11 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)

To: grey_whiskers

yep...that Richardson has his nose in everything...

1,307 posted on 07/01/2018 9:24:50 PM PDT by cherry (official troll)

make the boys stay in their beds and GO TO SLEEP!

Raised 3 boys, know exactly what you mean!

1,308 posted on 07/01/2018 9:28:02 PM PDT by eldoradude (Try believing your lying eyes for a change...)

> “ I hated to see you and ****** going at it.”

Well here’s a long explanation so that you might learn not to let yourself get wrapped up in superfluous, extraneous matters (IMO):

****** came at me saying the oaths of FBI personnel were not important, that oaths are hollow. He/She did not understand the legal basis and liability that an oath transfers and bonds to the oath taker.

I responded civilly through three responses to his assertions, each response with educational value to other viewers, until he/she went and found a case that he/she thought would prove me wrong (the Cramer case) and left a link but with an attitude that I am some sort of boob. But ****** failed. Why did he/she feel the need to take that approach?

I looked at the Cramer case at the link posted and immediately saw that Cramer was naturalized and immediately suspected that ****** did not know that Naturalized Citizens must take oaths of allegiance. So I responded pointing this out and leaving a link to the oath of allegiance required by Naturalized Citizens to take. But I decided to be strict with ****** because although he/she can bring good information on many issues, in this, ******’s information was misapplied, with a conclusion that was false, and the only reason he/she did this is due to his/her ego. That kind of behavior needs a smackdown. So I blasted *** and later apologized. Having a big ego is Ok (sufferable) if the communication is useful, having a big ego that spreads false info is not Ok.

If I did the same, letting my ego get in the way, I would expect and deserve to be smacked down. But one will never see me put my ego before bringing true and sufficiently complete information. If I don’t know something, I say I don’t know. I try to bring information that is complementary and educational. The only time I tout my background and credentials is when someone posts to me in a tone as if I am some boob that fell off the turnip truck. But even then, before I reveal my background, I gently ask questions or make statements that hopefully will make the poser’s wayward ego back down or adjust. I really am uninterested in engaging in a clash of egos unless it’s absolutely necessary and has an educational effect.

Certain posters need a smackdown IMO. There are those that let their egos get in the way of information flow. They end up bullying others unless they get some pushback. Others are welcome to push back against me if they don’t like my style but they better be ready to take return fire because 99.999% of the time I make factual statements and 90%+ of my inferences are accurate. That’s a result of my training. And when I am wrong I quickly announce it and make corrections.

I don’t care if someone brags about their life’s achievements. I don’t have to listen to it if I choose not to. There’s one Q decoder with a YT channel that is excellent but occasionally will start sermonizing and I am like “STOP IT! GET BACK TO THE INFORMATION!”. It’s all about faithful information exchange. If someone is unpopular personally but executes useful and accurate information, I will ignore their personal attri8butes and just absorb and distill the information content. Rush Limbaugh comes off to many new listeners as an obnoxious pr*ck, but I tell them “Listen for the content, the information, not to the personality!”.

The takeaway for people trying to learn from this is that it is important to always approach another person civilly, with respect, and with humility. That approach is very difficult whe confronted with people whose egos take over and decide to attack others using false pretexts, especially if such false info is a result of ignorance. Such people need a dressing down and rap on the knuckles. Those that are aware they are using false info, they are lost. I don’t give them the time of day.

That said, it’s Ok to have a big ego if the information is useful and truthful. God knows I have suffered difficult people but still managed to get a lot out of what they had to say. It’s better to have a humble spirit and be a purveyor of useful, accurate information. But often such humble persons are run over by others. Not so with me. I fight back. But with humble respectful people, I act civilly and strive for humility. I adjust my attitude to the person I am addressing.

Hopefully, this will help new viewers understand how they can participate in forum discussions without fearing to get blasted. Just be humble!

Just today I had a poster respond to a post I made telling me that Trump’s SCOTUS pick was a sure thing because there were “54 GOP Senators”.

So how did I respond?

Did I respond by saying:

“Why you nincompoop, dimwit, half-brained pissant, a few French fries short of a Happy Meal! Do you know you are engaging with? Me? God’s greatest gift to this forum?”

No, I didn’t even think that, not even an iota of it. I responded:

“The Senate has 51 GOP Senators.”

Maybe that response appears to some as smug and snobbish, I don’t care much. It’s a true statement, at least as true as I can transmit it.

1,309 posted on 07/01/2018 9:28:14 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)

Could I get some feedback (private message) on a proposed design for the post at the top of the thread (the first post with the links etc.)?

Below I’ll paste a link to the design in progress.

http://www.iment.com/maida/politics/trump/for-ransomnote.htm

Note: The current letter Q in the left upper corner is going to be replaced with a more detailed letter ‘Q’ design.

Could you let me know if the text is hard to read or the table organization is hard to follow?

What about the background color around the white text? If it’s too dark, would you like either the navy or gold shown (large blocks of color) at the lower half of this page?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/get-involved/

If the background color is okay, do you want the “Q Drop” hyperlink in the title of the table in MAGA Red to spice it up a little (or so people know to click on it)? Or just a MAGA red bold ‘Q’ in the upper left of the table? Inquiring minds want to know.

I realize there may be no consensus, but I’ll go down fighting for one! :) Private email is best. ThankQ

1,310 posted on 07/01/2018 9:28:30 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)

To: little jeremiah

> “We’re talking al-Qaeda. More recently, we’re talking MS-13, some of which I’m betting were nabbed with FISAs”

Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah have been seen and some nabbed at the Southern Border.

MS-13 is IMO not a group the FISA court takes time for or asserts jurisdiction over. They are IMO more a problem managed by US Border Patrol. They are though a murder-for-hire group for criminal operatives of democrat politicians. I haven’t heard of any GOP related operatives; I hope there are none.

1,311 posted on 07/01/2018 9:37:59 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)

1,312 posted on 07/01/2018 9:43:58 PM PDT by bitt ("we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.")

1,313 posted on 07/01/2018 9:44:30 PM PDT by bitt ("we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.")

WOW, LOOK AT THE “Q” IN THE RED BOX!!

WE’VE ARRIVED!!

1,314 posted on 07/01/2018 9:45:35 PM PDT by bitt ("we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.")

Think stages.
What role can MIL INTEL play?
What role can NSA play?
BANG!

Any thoughts on this one guys? What role can the Military intelligence and NSA (or Q) play in the indictment thing?
My only thought is the gathering of intelligence for evidence in the criminal proceedings. Is there something else I'm not thinking about? And what does "BANG" mean. Pull the trigger or what?

Suppose the crimes involved planning, plotting, fomenting, instigating, or some other form of active involvement in a plot to create a war, or nuclear war, or massive civil unrest, or an invasion, against the USA and its people.

Then suppose your nation's main investigative and law enforcement organizations were key players in such events, and such corruption, as well as key players in the legislative and judiciary, as well as former elected and appointed members of such groups.

Justice cannot come from such corrupted groups of people. Who then could the nation depend on to pursue justice against such powerful and inter-connected groups of criminals?

Only the military. After that, only We the People, and that would turn into a Bosnian scenario (times 1000) in a hurry.

1,315 posted on 07/01/2018 9:52:59 PM PDT by meadsjn

To: Hostage; Cboldt; bagster

“That approach is very difficult wheN confronted with people whose egos take over and decide to attack others...”

pot - black ?

~~~~
I don’t know you, Hostage, but you’re attacking people and calling them either stupid or devious.

I +DO+ know Cboldt, and I don’t like your insinuations.

Please stop it; we have enough trouble ignoring trolls, and don’t want to see offensive comments made to the regulars.

1,316 posted on 07/01/2018 9:54:12 PM PDT by bitt ("we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.")

maybe without their evil supplies, they’ll be driven to participate in the “suicide weekend” we’ve been waiting for...

1,317 posted on 07/01/2018 9:55:26 PM PDT by bitt ("we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.")

I look forward to OBummer being forcibly removed from the stage, wholesale, if not 100%.

1,318 posted on 07/01/2018 9:55:57 PM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)

You need to go back and review. There was no initiation by me. I will attack only when attacked unless it’s a troll who is disrupting a discussion.

Now my advice is to drop it.

1,319 posted on 07/01/2018 9:56:58 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)

To: little jeremiah

The globalist/Marxists stoolies in govgt & media descended on him with all their fangs and claws even way back then. They couldn’t afford to have him succeed.

1,320 posted on 07/01/2018 9:59:25 PM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794

"Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?"

Finding and Understanding Q Drops

Finding Q discussions and analyses on the web

Some of the history behind The Swamp

Resources for the way forward