How did the Strzok testimony go down? In other words, what was the process and who did the asking of questions? Do the congressional committee members ask the questions as they do when testimony is in the public view, or in this case behind closed doors do proxies for the members ask the questions?
Just throwing this out here, but if congressional members ask the questions then this Q-leaked portion has Trey Gowdy’s stamp all over it and then some. The specific questions themselves, the phraseology, word emphasis and the multiple insertion of the word ‘facts’ is a dead give-away to me that TG was in on this. It really hits home for me when I hear TG’s voice using those lines.
Someone up-thread mentioned Gowdy’s interrogation of HRC in past committee hearings, and the gist of it was TG just didn’t quite seem to have his full mojo going on and didn’t “finish” questioning with a flourish which may (or likely) was guided by DS influence.
That is NOT to say that TG is DS at all. Quite the contrary. Considering who he had on the “stand” and what DS schmitt was at stake, it’s easily imagined that he may have gotten a note or two stating that “we know where your kids go to school”. Something like that will take lead out of the toughest man’s pencil.
Temporarily.
Considering TGs announcement of not running for public office and his passion about striving for clean and pure law enforcement in this country, I think he is taking up arms against this and attacking from another angle in a new role. Payback time? (Yes we have discussed this here before, but I see this more clearly now.)
I see where Strzok testimony went “classified” at 7:00 PM yesterday and was still going on at 9:00 PM.
Clean-up on Aisle Q:
Thanks for the q drops !! These two are very interesting:
1) ND rally #1612 Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: d9dd2d No.1931438 Jun 27 2018 18:24:32 (EST) Anonymous ID: 903a48 No.1931405 Jun 27 2018 18:22:08 (EST)
>>1931388 Q! Not now! We are listening to some ND guy talking before Trump speaks!
>>1931405 Just landed. You have time. Q
2) Strzok at panel: #1605 Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 1a8b54 No.1926130 Jun 27 2018 12:31:43 (EST)
PS “Texts taken out of context”
PS “While emotional over the election, I conduct myself w/ upmost integrity w/o bias while undertaking any such investigation, especially a high-profile case against the POTUS.”
PS “In hindsight, it was a bad idea to openly discuss my feelings, but, in no way did those feelings impact my ability to conduct a fair and proper investigation - we followed where the “facts” took us.”
PS “I decline to answer that question on advice from counsel.”
: When you state “where ‘facts’ led us” - what ‘facts’ are you referring to? To date, there has been zero evidence of any such collusion or connections between the Trump campaign and Russia.” In fact, the only facts discovered thus far have been between the Clinton camp and Russia and other foreign groups….”
PS “On advice of counsel, I decline to answer that question”
PS “Because of the ongoing investigation, such answers may violate the security of such investigations……….”
: “Mr S, I believe nobody here is buying what you are selling. I believe there was/is a serious effort on the part of people more senior than you to remove Mr Trump from office out of fear of what this Administration may uncover.
I believe you are being dishonest in your answers and frankly shocked you agreed to come here today.
I believe everyone on this panel (minus those from the other side of the aisle) knew exactly what your answers would be and if you think we are going to sit here and accept these answers you would be a foolish.
We are also following the facts and once we uncover more (which we will) we will act accordingly. I’m glad you retained counsel - you’ll need one and hopefully they are very good.
“ ………………….
Q