Q Anon: 6/15/18 FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops

qanon.pub ^ | 6/15/18 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[Steven W.]

Lionel did a video around the time of Merkel heritage revelations and said something to the effect of “once you get ‘Q’ normal news just doesn’t cut it, boring and stale” ;)

[Steven W.]

The MAP being everything that’s on the “Q” pages - i.e. the aggregated sets of posts ... it’s the background and understanding to the news. Such that when events happen you then have insight ala “aha!” and connecting the dots.

[eldoradude]

They are also arrogant in their know-it-all attitude

I think that relates to the psychology research indicating that the less intelligent are the most confident in their incompetent conclusions.

[grey_whiskers]

Who told you to post a picture of David Hogg's mom?

[AZHSer]

I think there was some discussion of that on earlier threads. One theory is if Obama is an illegitimate president, then his appointment of of Huber is illegitimate. PDJT had to reappoint Huber to make his investigations legal.

[USMC79to83]

Hat-Tip to BillyV and Thanks to RansomNote

[ransomnote]

I always enjoy your posts - the graphics and memes are great. I steal them frequently and often forget to say THANKQ. :)

THANKQ!

[eldoradude]

So many comments that would be deleted...

[Fellow Traveler]

Not to rehash something but I am finally caught up with the thread and wanted to bring up the missile launch near Seattle the other day. I have a theory that ties into some other stuff that has been proposed on these threads in the past. I call it "Speak secretly and carry a big rod".

A great deal of speculation occurred when the NK nuke site suffered its collapse and explosion, several months ago. Many on the thread speculated that the United States might have used a "Rods from Gods" type weapon on the complex. For those that are unfamiliar with the concept basically a large mass is dropped from space on a given location. The mass could be something like a long rod made of tungsten or other extremely durable material that would penetrate deeply and use its kinetic energy alone to destroy the target. The rod would need a rudimentary guidance package and GPS locator to direct it.

One problem with this theory is you would need a pretty big booster to get a weapons package into orbit and such launches would be noticed. The United States does launch the occasional classified payload into space. The aviation and space community usually does a pretty good job of identifying the types of spy satellites that have been launched. To the best of my knowledge we have not launched many unidentified secret payloads, or at least they haven't been noted.

However, if the weapons package could be launched from a submarine, via a trident d5 missile, the launch could happen anywhere in the world. Only two nations currently have satellite networks that monitor for missile launch, the US and the Russians. Those systems though look primarily at areas where a SSBN could place a nuclear missile into our territory. Vast stretches of the southern hemisphere would be wide open.

What I think has happened is that the United States has deployed some form of a "Rods from God" type weapon. That weapon was kept as a secret project. The weapon was used to destroy facilities in North Korea.

This brings us to the launch the other day. The launch was from the Puget sound area , and the consensus was that it was fired to the North. A "Rods from God" weapon would ideally be stored in a polar orbit. This makes it so every location on earth is flown over.

So why launch the weapon from an area where everybody can see it. With the prior use in NK it is probably that most of the bad actors on the planet know what happened. Some of them may doubt we have the capability to launch more of these, or may doubt that we can replenish this weapon system easily. The launch near Seattle was a direct threat/show of force to other bad actors, probably Iran since we have been told they are next. We are telling them quite simply "YOU ARE NEXT AND WE MEAN IT". I don't think it was the deep state at all doing this.

A couple of other notes. It is also possible that we have the rods from god weapon but that it is sub-orbital only thus the launch near Seattle was because we found a real time threat that needed to be neutralized in a hurry, a northern trajectory would work for targets all over the Eurasian land mass. I first got this idea when some freepers were talking about the Trident D5 missile that our SSBN's use. I remembered reading that it is a solid fuel missile. I also remember reading articles about how solid fuel missiles have a shelf life, they were talking about stingers in that case but all of them suffer from cracks and voids forming in the missile fuel. It occurred to me that a good use for an end of life trident D5 rocket motor would be placing weapons packages in low earth orbit. The standard guidance package and MIRV equipment could be removed from the missiles, hopefully not sold to the Chinese ala Clinton and Loral. A simpler weapons package put in its place. Cart the missiles to a remote corner of the pacific. Have the crew launch them. The crew wouldn't even have to know what they were launching, just fire these off in this direction. If a few of the missiles fail to reach orbit because of motor failure just make sure they splash over empty ocean. Another thing that got me thinking on these lines is my visit to the Titan missile museum near Tucson. I remember them telling us that when the Titan missiles were retired they were repurposed as satellite launch vehicles.

Of course the obvious question here is do I have any proof, not a shred. This could be done but has it been done is another question. Of course it maybe some variation of what I mentioned as well, sub orbital versus orbital, a sub orbital weapon would necessitate launching in real time, we could also try and see if something went boom in the hour after the Seattle missile launch. If you have read this far thank you for taking the time to do so, and again this is my speculation take it for what it is worth.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Q

[Wu]

Needs to be run through facial recognition software.

[txhurl]

B*U*M*P!!

[bitt]

(clapping)

[Guardian Sebastian]

AM - Andrew McCabe
SR - Could be Susan Rice?

[bagster]

Look the ‘BAGSTER ORACLE’ is post# 188.

There are no coincidences.

:)

Bagster

[bitt]

https://twitter.com/LisaMei62/status/1008021847408087042

[eldoradude]

[Steven W.]

SR = Susan Rice (in that context, SR = Seth Rich in others)

[LiveFreeOrDie2001]

THANKS for the Google Activity Link!!!

I have most everything “Paused”, but it had my (innocent) search history listed.

EVERYONE! Go here & update!!! https://myactivity.google.com/myactivity

[eldoradude]