Q Anon: FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops

qanon.pub ^ | 6/13/2018 | FReepers, Vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[smileyface]

If you had those in hard copy outside of the SCIF w/o auth we’d be under the jail. She had them accessible online (purposefully). The sailor got two years and DD for pics, this is worth a rope.

---

worth repeating when contacting your congresscritter

[WildHighlander57]

Is this related to it:

https://m.facebook.com/groups/1681114351952984?view=permalink&id=1846564685407949

[bagster]

Interesting theory. Not sure if I'm down with it, though. Why would Japan believe we launched a missile at them out of the clear blue sky. We got no beef with them. What would be our alleged motivation?

And what does this chick say happened to the missile?

Bagster

[SkyPilot]

Here is what I see as the proverbial "Bottom Line" in all of this discussion:

Q said there is an unmodified, unredacted version of the IG report. Until that is released to the public (if the FULL report ever will be), we are just spinning our wheels - - round and round and round.

I spoke to a prosecutor friend yesterday who works for the Federal government. He said (and I am quoting here): "That report says 'not motivated by political bias' by the FBI and DOJ - yet what transpired is the very definition of political bias, because they attempted to destroy President-elect and President Trump."

Therefore, the report as released is not worth the paper it is written on.

Q has hinted that President Trump may take action, but until that happens, there really isn't anything else to discuss on this matter. We all have a huge let down, after months of waiting for the report, and there is no use in sugar coating this fact.

Hopefully, things will improve. Hopefully. But let's not pretend the American people and true justice didn't just get kicked in the Jimmy.

[bagster]

Of course this report is a hoax. But it's not the full report. Trump knows what's in the full report. These redactions leave Rosenstein hanging out to dry. He met with Trump for 2.5 hours today.

Wouldn't you like to have been a fly on the wall in that meeting?

I bet we start to see repercussions from it all in the next two days (before the hearing.) And the hearing COULD be very juicy and create some history. I'm hoping anyway.

Keep hope alive.

p.s. Justice is not over until it's over.

Oh damn. I meant to put this in my Oracle. Let me do another post about it. You just reminded me.

Bagster

[smileyface]

here’s link
The Ingraham Angle 6/14/18 I With Laura Ingraham Fox News I June 14,2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nb7dxbqZzDY

[corlorde]

The gist of the report comes down to two main points, and the President commented on both of those points in twitter this morning. These are the two bombshells, in my opinion, and we don't need to look at much else. The report clearly shows there is zero interest in going after Hillary, or Huma for that matter. Whatever is ‘redacted’ won't change that, unfortunately.

Donald J. Trump

Verified account

@realDonaldTrump
57m57 minutes ago

The IG Report is a total disaster for Comey, his minions and sadly, the FBI. Comey will now officially go down as the worst leader, by far, in the history of the FBI. I did a great service to the people in firing him. Good Instincts. Christopher Wray will bring it proudly back!

@realDonaldTrump
1h1 hour ago

FBI Agent Peter Strzok, who headed the Clinton & Russia investigations, texted to his lover Lisa Page, in the IG Report, that “we’ll stop” candidate Trump from becoming President. Doesn’t get any lower than that!

[MagnoliaB]

I am humbled by your praise. Thank you.

[OKSooner]

Met with Trump when today for 2.5 hours? Today, Friday June 15th for 2.5 hours, finished before 6:37 AM?

Not sayin' that can't be the case... if it is then it kinda would seem to be a "big f'n deal" to someone...

[bagster]

$~~~THE BAGSTER ORACLE~~~$

***EXTRA...EXTRA!***

The Oracle has received a transcript of an interview of a high level FBI agent's interview by an OIG investigator;

OIG guy- Agent Redacted, can you explain this text you wrote saying, "I hate that orange Drumpf fascist bastard. I will do anything I can to see that he isn't elected President. I heard he hates women and puppies. Damn his eyes."

OIG guy- And this, "You know, I'm with her. It's about time we elected somebody with a vagina to the Presidency. That's what's really important. Let's see what we can do to make that happen."

OIG guy- Or this, "Andy says even if that clown wins, there's an "insurance policy" being worked on as we speak to take down Mr MAGA. Hahahaha. LOL. :)"

Agent Redacted- Uh...well. I was just stressed out. And that Drumpf guy grabs women by the P word, you know. I was just venting.

OIG guy- Did your attitude toward either political candidate shape in any way your professional conduct and/or decision making while investigating the alleged wrongdoing of both candidates?,P. Agent Redacted- Hell no.

OIG guy- Thank you, agent. I think we're done here.

Results of OIG investigation regarding FBI Special Agent Redacted:

No political bias here. Send in the next agent.

Bagster

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: Don’t feed the trolls, please. ::

Actually, I think we need a select few to totally engage the Deepies, refuting their inanities and providing facts to them. This will accomplish 2 things:

1) allowing others to recall the work that has been done. I may trigger an association they have yet to recognize; and,

2) It doesn’t distract those not involved with deconstructing a Deepie so we can go about our Q-business.

The Alter-Cletus

[edzo4]

Seeing as the C-40 is just a Boeing 737 I can see where someone would make the mistake, but you can clearly see (well I can sorry about the eyes bags) the United airlines livery, you can also clearly see the c-40 cargo door is not there.

[WildHighlander57]

Here’s what I found from the link on the previous q thread, in cboldt’post:

https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/1006850222373462016

To: bagster

Wednesday, 13 June 2018
06:10:32 #POTUS #Motorcade Arrival - the #WhiteHouse secure area

“Good to be back at the castle! No time for rest and relaxation, we must continue to serve the American people.”

@POTUS_Schedule 6:46 AM - 13 Jun 2018

26 posted on Wed Jun 13 06:16:03 2018 by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

& I replied to cboldt:

Q Anon: FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops
Fri Jun 15 07:00:05 2018 · 1,171 of 1,171
WildHighlander57 to Cboldt

Also look at IamQ reply here:

https://mobile.twitter.com/DianeHauschildt/status/1006973669271310336

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies
Q Anon: FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops
Fri Jun 15 06:58:28 2018 · 1,170 of 1,171
WildHighlander57 to Cboldt

https://mobile.twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/1006850222373462016

See Diane Hauschildt reply !

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies

Could have been deep state trying to start a war by doing a false flag...

[bagster]

I think there are multiple paths to Hillary. Did you see what Nunez said about the Weiner laptop Hillary information regarding "child sex?" He said, in more than one interview (that I read about but didn't see) that now that that has been mentioned in the IG report, it is no longer confidential and can be investigated.

And he's the one who can follow through on that. It could get interesting. And Congress may refer the email scandal for further investigation. This thing is far from over. We have only seen the opening act.

This summer looks to be a bumpy ride.

Fasten your seat belts.

Bagster

[LiveFreeOrDie2001]

WOW!!

We need OUR OWN version of a “Drudge Siren” for the alarming info.....

[bagster]

Oh, sorry. I haven't been to sleep so I'm still on yesterday. They met yesterday for 2.5 hours. The sun isn't up in my neck of the woods yet. Time does fly, doesn't it? :)

Bagster

[WildHighlander57]

Correction, see Steviegee’s reply to Diane Hauschildt, not IamQ.

https://mobile.twitter.com/DianeHauschildt/status/1006973669271310336

https://mobile.twitter.com/stevegamble10/status/1006977869279584258

[conservativesister]

Saying things like: “You’ve all been proven wrong and there should no long be tolerance for these moronic threads………From now one you folks pushing this crap are acting like fools and defending traitor Jeff Session’s.”

Is calling all who read these threads FOOLS, the way to make friends & influence people? I think not, it would be much better to attack the Q post instead of Freepers!

Thank you very much!@Q

[bagster]

You make an excellent case, Cletus.

Bagster

[SkyPilot]

I bet we start to see repercussions from it all in the next two days (before the hearing.) And the hearing COULD be very juicy and create some history. I'm hoping anyway.

I have the same hope my good friend, and I think that is true for almost everyone here on the board.

I trust Trump's instincts and motivations, but I don't trust many of those around him. He is fighting the beast here, almost (not completely, but almost) alone.

But even if the full report comes out, it will only fill in some gaps. The report doesn't even deal with matters beyond the e-mail "investigation" debacle. And to reiterate, there is no good to come in sugar coating that this "report" as it stands now is a con job.

The full horror of what has gone on in Washington (and what continues to go on this very day) may never be exposed or prosecuted. Or if it is exposed, it may not come out for years, or decades.

Or, as Bruce said back in 1986, that's just the way it is.