Posted on 06/13/2018 11:16:52 PM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.
If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos
Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index
Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump
Gopwdy “much more permissive approach” to the investigation
Good ole Gowdy talking out of both sides of his mouth again.
Amen!
This act has a longer timespan. Senate Judiciary hearing with Horowitz on Tuesday. POTUS won't take declassification action before then, he'll see if Congress is ready to do some a$$ kicking first.
Separate, a Sarah Huckabee presser at 2:30 today. Was announced with less than the usual advance notice.
There you go again!!
Changing your name to MR BUZZKILL!!
I will make sure to catch Sarah (who is NOT resigning at the end of the year)
I was SO hoping POTUS would do the EO thing today or tomorrow!
Today begins the tension for FReeQs. If the EO is not “put into play” soon (either directly or threatened) then Q certainly IS a very good LARP.
I will care not if upper level FBI players are indicted or fired. The key will be the EO.
I’ve got a lot to do in the next 2 days. Will check back during breaks, can yall ping me to any important stuff? I do get Q drop pings already but sometimes there’s other important stuff.
Not sure if posted
New Q 1498
https://thefederalist.com/2018/06/13/look-inspector-generals-report-doj-fbi-election-interference/
The Federalist:
What To Look For In The Inspector Generals Report About DOJ And FBI Election Interference
some key points of interest.
Will There Be Criminal Prosecutionand of Whom?
On the big picture, there will be two final take-aways of note from Horowitzs report: first, whether the IGs conclusions raise the possibility of criminal prosecution and, if so, of whom. The IG has already referred a criminal case against former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe to DCs U.S. attorneys office. That was based on Horowitzs findings that McCabe was responsible for leaks to the Wall Street Journal but lied about his role both to his former boss, FBI director James Comey, and to investigators.
While the IG report will not announce what criminal referrals, if any, have been made, the findings will provide insight, just as did the announcement that McCabe demonstrated a lack of candor in his conversations with Comey and investigators.
Second, Horowitzs report will indicate whether there will be calls for a fresh investigation of Hillary Clinton for her use of a private server and reckless handling of classified material while U.S. secretary of state. IG Horowitz is not investigating Clinton, but the OIGs focus on the FBI and DOJs handling of the Clinton investigation and report will likely reveal numerous deficiencies in the underlying probe. The deficiencies exposed will prompt calls for a new, unbiased, and thorough investigation of Clinton.
Democrats and the press will predictably push back, branding the demands a partisan ploy to take the focus off Special Counsel Robert Muellers investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. The details of the report will dictate which of these dueling narratives succeeds.
The rest of the article at the link, worth reading.
Which he probably donated himself.
▶Q !CbboFOtcZs 06/14/18 (Thu) 13:28:13 No.109 File (hide): ca6c54309bf268c⋯.jpg (26.45 KB, 712x179, 712:179, 321RR.jpg) (h) (u) [[RR]] approved/signed FISA-warrant application(s) to extend surveillance on POTUS/others. What evidence to support? Snowball. [[RR]] @ WH. Why was Rachel Brand removed? Critical thinking. Q
#1498
Q !CbboFOtcZs No.109 📁 NEW
Jun 14 2018 12:28:13 (EST) 321RR.jpg
[[RR]] approved/signed FISA-warrant application(s) to extend surveillance on POTUS/others.
What evidence to support?
Snowball.
[[RR]] @ WH.
Why was Rachel Brand removed?
Critical thinking.
Q
____________________________________________________________________
Hee Hee! That’s what happens when you conspire with Rats Wolfe! You tool!
I think it would impossible to tell the difference between a very good larp and an insider. Neither is going to have a perfect crystal ball.
I think most of the timing conclusions are imputed by the readers. Also, on "declassification," note there are two separate issues. One is removing redactions, the other is getting what Q refers to as #1, the report without RR/DOJ edits.
DeSantis called for the "original" (not RR/DOJ edited) report.
Don;t forget there is another DOJ/OIG report in the works, that one having to do with the FISA abuse and warrantless snooping.
Couldn’t even beg a twenty...
Rush was has a caller wondering why there are no leaks about the report. LOL, That’s an easy one. They are all seeing if they are in it! Might be a suicide weekend. Swamp is starting to lose it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.