Posted on 06/11/2018 7:00:54 AM PDT by rickmichaels
Five-month-old twins in Virginia; a one-year-old in Tennessee; a three-year-old in Indiana; a nine-month-old in Texas; a three-year-old in Ontario; a nine-month-old in Tennessee.
All dead, left behind in a blistering hot car within the past few weeks. I sorely doubt any of them were left intentionally, and there might be no more hotly debated topic than intent regarding these tragedies. A six-year-old saved from a hot car in Hamilton, Ontario by passersby had been left in the car on purpose. A medal to those who meddle. Thank you.
But how do you solve a problem nobody thinks they have?
In the U.S., 751 children have died of heatstroke in cars since 1998. The average is 37 per year; the Canadian average is four to six deaths annually. The headlines are gut-wrenching, the stories unbearable. Whether you have children or not, the death of our most vulnerable could only fail to resonate if you have a stone for a heart.
Two manufacturers GM and Hyundai have entered the ring with possible solutions, and there are hundreds (if not thousands) of aftermarket gadgets available. Middle school kids make it their science fair project. Some inventors approach it from a tech angle an app on your phone, a sensor to light up your keyfob and some from a more rudimentary one a stuffed toy on the seat as a reminder, additional mirrors.
But this problem goes far deeper than a hunt for a solution. While there may be an overload of suggestions on the supply side of the equation, there is almost no appetite for a solution on the buying end. Simply put, nobody believes they would ever be capable of forgetting something as precious as their child in a car, and therefore they have no use for a device, upgrade, or stock feature that could prevent it.
Ive written on the topic before, and Ive locked myself in a hot car to show how excruciating it is even for an adult in controlled circumstances. And every time, without fail, commenters will predictably assert the parents of dead children are negligent, period.
No wonder few are interested in layering in some safety feature that may save some lives. To do so is to admit good parents can become trapped in the horror of being responsible for the death of their own child.
Those U.S. statistics at the comprehensive website noheatstroke.org reveal that incidents of loss can occur one of three main ways:
A child forgotten by a caregiver/parent 54 per cent
A child playing in an unattended vehicle 27 per cent
A child intentionally left in a vehicle 18 per cent
Go to a baby shower and give the expectant parents a baby monitor that will allow them to hear and see their child at all times while also tracking the babys breathing and vital signs. Give them a clip they can attach to a car seat to remind them if theyve left a sleeping baby behind by accident (various aftermarket products are a version of this), and expect to be ushered out of the room by horrified attendees. That is the problem were facing in trying to eradicate that first category.
First, it can happen. To anyone. And it has. The best reporting on the subject was by Gene Weingarten a decade ago in the Washington Post, and it remains a brilliant depiction of what can happen to the human brain for all of us. You are not an exception. Unfortunately, it seems the same hard wiring that can lead to unimaginable tragedy also makes it impossible for us to accept our own fallibility. Numbers peak in hotter summer months and southern states, but it happens all over and the numbers dont get better. Whatever were doing isnt working.
GM introduced a chime system on some of their models. If youve opened the rear doors within ten minutes before turning on the engine, you will receive a chime and visual reminder to check the backseat. Hyundai is debuting a system featuring sensors that detect motion in the backseat. Both systems are laudable, but drivers tune chimes out very quickly, and children under age two half the recorded deaths dont move around much if theyve fallen asleep. By the time a distressed child could set off a sensor, the temperature in the car could have spiked to horrific highs. A car heats up like an oven.
Im grateful for any manufacturer who is spending on R&D in this field, but Id rather see stock sensors based on weight. No, I dont know how to do that. But the fact that 27 per cent of deaths arise from children playing in vehicles theyve gained access to, theres another reason to make the tech we believe we need for entertaining and protecting us to be used to protect our kids. By the way: always lock your car in your driveway.
Its a sad irony that deaths started rising when we started putting our tiniest children in the safest place rear facing in the back seat. I dont know any parent who wouldnt do whats best for their children; and that includes hundreds in North American who have suffered the most crushing loss of all.
We dont refuse to buy smoke detectors because we would never burn our houses down. We buy them because its a cheap way to make sure we can protect our families in the event of a tragedy. We need to shift the thinking from I would never do that to how can we prevent this?

“Technology is NEVER and substitute for good management... ..”
What cook needs a timer anyway?
[Smoke pouring from kitchen.]
Simple solution: Don’t leave your baby/toddler in a car unattended. I don’t give a damn what the temp is.
When I ran into to pay for gas I used to leave my child in the car. I knew I had left her. It only took one death on the news for me to change my ways.
Those who forget probably shouldnt be driving. They are too distracted or impaired.
‘Technology is NEVER and substitute for good management... ..’
Good management goes through phases to improve. And perfection is never achieved.
Like their phone
Why couldn't auto makers put a brief audible notice in the car that states or asks just prior to driver leaving the vehicle.....”Is a child left in this vehicle?”
I will say this, until we have safe borders, kids are at risk of kidnapping. I suspect that is much more common than heat exposure.
Read the stories. They dont pan out that way. The excuse is I forgot. The reality is they were either high or drunk or so distracted that they shouldnt have been driving a multi ton weapon in the first place
Yes, but not all. I can see how it could happen.
‘When I ran into to pay for gas I used to leave my child in the car.’
When I was a brat, I was left alone in the car all the time. I got sunburn so bad that I ended up with blisters.
For the most part life was good. People were free. Kids used to clown around haflway out the windows. Dangerous, but free.
People used to ride without using seatbelts. They were free to do so.
I dunno. We’re being squeezed in, compressed into something ugly.
Cars should have other warnings:
“Did you eat your greens to-day?”
“Do you have thrombosis?”
Actually, that is a good idea. Purse, cell phone, wallet.
“The reality is they were either high or drunk or ...”
High or drunk while driving and then the kid suffers from heat exposure?
That triple combo most definitely merits thrwing the book at someone.
But if someone runs a red light when no other car is around, who the heck cares? If someone has an empty beer can in his car but not driving under the influence, who cares?
Ka-ching!
Zing-em for money and squeeze freedom from society.
You are right. We had a tragic case a few years ago where it was a father driving, and I don’t think it was routine for him to drive the kids.
Here’s another one — kid unlocks safety seat harness, distracts parent, who crashes.
Kid dies.
I think the parent has suffered enough, don’t you?
Yesterday, I locked my dog away in the car for about 5 minutes, running into a store. Once I was in the store, I realized that I had not opened the windows. So I returned to the car. I didn’t forget about the dog; I forgot about the windows...
“Those who forget probably shouldnt be driving. They are too distracted or impaired.”
A driver has one job: Keep occupants alive and unharmed.
All BS. The government killed all these kids.
Parents would never forget a baby if the baby seat were beside them in the front passenger seat.
This fact has been obvious for years, and yet, despite much safer cars and controllable airbags, the rule on car seats has not been changed. Why? I think my tag line explains it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.