Posted on 05/21/2018 7:34:13 AM PDT by MNDude
A medical professional who verified Obama's birth certificate with 8 other people was in a plane crash into the ocean in 2013. Donald Trump tweeted the following about this at the time.
"How amazing, the State Health Director who verified copies of Obamas birth certificate died in plane crash today. All others lived"
One of the other passengers was wearing a go cam video camera during the entire time. A news station played a few seconds of this video. In the video, you can see Ms.Fuddy, the health director safe and alive holding onto an airplane wing. Then it appears that a frogman, wearing a scuba diving suit emerges from the water and approaches her.
Many times Trump knows more about an event than he lets on when he mentions it. Remember the wiretapping comment? Remember the comment about pervert Anthony Weiner having access to classified material?
Watch the video in slow-motion yourself.
https://youtu.be/9v636AlaVmE
I believe that is true.
Even so, are we supposed to let them pass unopposed in this time?
For us, the best way to find out what’s true is to examine all possibilities.
For the deep state, the best way to hide the truth is to discourage truth seekers from examining possibilities.
What you’re doing is discouraging others from examining possibilities.
Why would the deep state avoid a FR thread about Obama’s birth certificate?
Answer: they would be on it like flies.
There are tens of thousands of people working for the "deep state". They are mortals.
Like all groups, they have internal factions and feuds which they try to conceal from outsiders. They step on each other's feet a lot. They have vicious infighting which nullifies their effectiveness. Self-destructive individuals tend to rise to the top, wrecking everything in their path.
With the right constraints, and just a little push, they will lose by their own activities, devouring their own in the process.
It is up to us to find those constraints and push in the right places.
Right, because every insidious, globe-spanning conspiracy is just waiting for the latest tin foil thread on FR because you internet detectives are about to crap the case wide open.
*crack the case, rather
Why would the deep state pass up an opportunity to eliminate Lorena Fuddy by using an operative trained in aquatics?
Thanks for posting this... I missed it back when it happened because I had completely tuned out... I knew nothing anybody did or said would ever make any difference, because it was top inside corruption that was going on and being covered up by the Obama administration and no matter what came out, nothing would make any difference, because there was nobody that would prosecute it... The system of checks and balances was broken (or had to be corrupted by blackmail) I had said it for years before Obama was elected, Washington was broken and it was not a Dem/Rep thing... Corruption was rampant within both parties.
Since Q posted Trump’s tweet from way back earlier, I knew what I already thought about the crash was probably true, but I had no idea there was this video proof. This whole draining the swamp is taking a lot longer than I hoped it would, but I assumed after Obama won a second term our Republic was lost for good, so in that respect, It cant be fixed overnight... Had to clean out the corrupt cabal at the top so the criminals are not released by their corrupt friend somewhere between the investigator or prosecutor and the judge at the end...
I just hope the IG report is not further delayed and this snowball really gets rolling, because stuff is finally starting to trickle out but the truth has been hidden far too long. I do like the way it is playing out... sure fun to watch, too bad so many are too blind to enjoy this show, that resignation list is getting pretty LONG.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B-95giwldeKgsd0nYiw_sEaSf4kGNLZgEIvEhL2mVAw/edit#gid=0
Some of those "possibilities" are poisoned bait. They are useful only to distract people from following the tracks of prime movers and their minions.
What if Freepers just think of it as a casual, even interesting, conversation? To think it’s about “cracking the case” is an egregious misinterpretation on your part.
Should your misinterpretation be a license to disrupt the conversations of others?
It’s only a conversation. I do not currently work for the DOJ.
See post #132.
Thanks for the ping.
Wish Butter were still around....she had very interesting research about this.....good discussion.
Maybe Boogieman is one of Brennan’s boogiemen.
nothing would make any difference, because there was nobody that would prosecute it...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There is still no one who will prosecute the crimes of the Kenyanesian Usurpation.
If so, he’d best be on his toes.
Because they did not have such an opportunity.
It is hard to plan an operation and things always go wrong. No mortal is capable of anticipating all of the events that would place an assassin in the water right next to the target after a plane crash.
The "Deep State" does have staff limitations you know. They cannot be everywhere at the same time. At best, they might have two or three backup plans for a given operation. The "Frogman Assassin" theory would require hundreds of backup plans and a very substantial working group. People would talk. Somebody always does.
If you want to plan a low-probability "random" event (like a school mass-shooting) you must groom a very large number of candidates and play the odds that one of them will light up at the right time.
The Fuddy incident did not have that initial large field of candidate possibilities. The critical nexus is the possible tampering with the plane at some time before takeoff. The rest is simply the workings of chance.
You can see Fuddy in the upper left, with both her upper and lower life jacket chambers inflated. That means both cartridges were expended. The NTSB's report narrative was to give the coroner (since she was already slated to die) a reason to be stressed and brought to a stage of hyperventilation. The story would be that an infant life jacket couldn't sustain her, especially when it was only half inflated. That storyline "blows up", however, when she's captured in the video shortly after exiting the plane wearing a fully-inflated adult life jacket. Note that is looks very different from the known-to-be-infant life jacket of the guy in the middle of the top picture.
This would be just one of several clearly incorrect statements from the NTSB.
(BTW, it appears my photo provider isn't happy with the bandwidth my pix are using. If the picture doesn't immediately appear, it will hopefully later, or I may have to use a different provider. YMMV.)
And I do not currently work for any Government agency.
But I did at one time, long ago. It was educational.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.