Primary sourced material? What is it? Where did you get it?
You have none.
Since you are discussing whether Q is correct about Sessions, by definition Q's own words on Sessions become relevant.
There's an old joke about a languages professor droning on and on to a class about how a double negative makes a positive, and a negative and a positive becomes a negative, but there is NO construct under which a double positive communicates a negative.
Just then a voice languidly calls out from the back of the classroom,
"Yeah, right."
Point being, sarcasm and taunting exist in general; they have been shown to exist in Q posts (e.g. "Welcome back, Huma.")
Hence, Trust Sessions *might* be directed to Deep Staters, not Q followers, and indicate that either Sessions is a secret White Hat (despite the Deep State's trust of him), OR that Sessions has been rendered ineffectual for whatever role the Deep State counted upon him to fulfill.