Since you are discussing whether Q is correct about Sessions, by definition Q's own words on Sessions become relevant.
There's an old joke about a languages professor droning on and on to a class about how a double negative makes a positive, and a negative and a positive becomes a negative, but there is NO construct under which a double positive communicates a negative.
Just then a voice languidly calls out from the back of the classroom,
"Yeah, right."
Point being, sarcasm and taunting exist in general; they have been shown to exist in Q posts (e.g. "Welcome back, Huma.")
Hence, Trust Sessions *might* be directed to Deep Staters, not Q followers, and indicate that either Sessions is a secret White Hat (despite the Deep State's trust of him), OR that Sessions has been rendered ineffectual for whatever role the Deep State counted upon him to fulfill.
That is very interesting. Certainly something to think upon. I do think Q is communicating to multiple audiences on multiple levels.
This leaves Sessions the ability to act like he's a black hat while being a white hat and having the people he's "reassuring" think he's on their side.