Posted on 05/19/2018 11:38:32 PM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.
If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos
Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index
Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump
I read a large part of it. What I meant, maybe I wasn’t clear, that very possibly Mueller was offered a choice of something like “you’re dirty, you can be put away, or you can do the right thing for once”.
Of course, I have no idea...
I would like to see Levin be on the Trump Team in some capacity. It took him long enough to germinate, but I feel hes pretty much on board. That guy knows his stuff and can aticulate his position like nobodys business. (OK...incoming .308 rounds in 1, 2, 3...)
IMO, Levin and those who placed him, expected conservatives to follow his “never Trump” lead. When they left levin instead, then new tactics arose.
I will NEVER trust Levin. Those that “forgive” his betrayal at a crucial time are free to do so. A tiger does not change its stripes. Levin thinks we are stupid enough to follow him once again.
It’s either about the money, or misleading us elsewhere.
Just my opinion. If Levin truly supports President Trump, he certainly does not need us....anymore that we needed his betraying piece of flesh during the elections.
If he meets these criteria:
Lawful Combatants. A lawful combatant is an individual authorized by governmental authority or the LOAC to engage in hostilities. A lawful combatant may be a member of a regular armed force or an irregular force. In either case, the lawful combatant must be commanded by a person responsible for subordinates; have fixed distinctive emblems recognizable at a distance, such as uniforms; carry arms openly, and conduct his or her combat operations according to the LOAC. The LOAC applies to lawful combatants who engage in the hostilities of armed conflict and provides combatant immunity for their lawful warlike acts during conflict, except for LOAC violations.
“Martial” — as in Military...
Yes, MOH=Medal of Honor
That would be a lot like appealing to Hitler’s better nature...
Amen
That pic of Hannity wearing that small Q pin...well...dang! That just makes me smile. I normally log onto a local radio station each work day to hear Rush whos followed by Sean. I kind of suspected he was on it...this is a confirm. I will be listening a little differently tomorrow and hence forth.
Is there a Q pin? If not, we need one.
If the alternative was Mueller would be on the other side of the law, the unpleasant side.
Thanks for the great write up on that. Not to suppress your great research, but I’m anything but a rookie as to Barko’s status. You did clear up a a couple of loose ends for me regarding McBlame and his standing. No doubt he’s in on the scam, too.
This will kick the fire ant hill: documention, as false as it likely is, says 1961 for Barko’s birth year which would mean Hawaii was a state at the time. 1959 Hawaii and Alaska became official. Right?
Oh Yes: Marina Abromovic’s Pretty, Pretty boys will be answering charges REAL soon. Their Wives, too.
I believe that she earned hers by her own merit, but she enabled the 0. Only get to hang her once. I'm torn between outing her in everything, then the long drop or getting the first DP conviction then the drop. Then the rest of her evil exposed in court findings in absentia.
Moonchildren BUSTED.
As long as it isn't "marital" law, as in marriage. I don't wish to marry the government in any way, shape, or form! :)
That it was Page/Strzok? No, that is supposition in an attempt to understand the posted pic. Those 2 are the only couple in the cabal that we know of where the chick has a Kerryesque horse face. However the photo had meaning to someone in this mess. Likely P&S saw themselves and was part of their decision to cooperate since they were screwed if MI had stuff from that far back.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.