Posted on 05/17/2018 6:21:07 PM PDT by ransomnote
Looks like it’s been around for 4 years. Consider who is using it, is likely fine.
...will prey on skunks...
_______________________
I now officially love them!
Interesting post with well thought out material
You could be right. We will all know soon enough.
Sorry if already posted
Informant Spied on Trump Campaign Before the FBI Officially Began Its Probe
..,
FBI officials have said they began investigating the Trump administration on July 31, 2016, after stolen Democratic National Committee emails were released on July 22, 2016, prompting Australian officials to come forward with information they received from Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos months earlier....
However the problem with that account is that the FBI informant had approached Trump campaign adviser Carter Page before that email release on July 22, 2016, and before the Australians came forward with the information, supposedly after that.
..,,
The timeline of events indicate that the current and former officials lied about when their investigation of the Trump campaign started, and why.
Ping for later viewing.
Sure, when there is verifiable information. Not all info is intel. Consider what Q has asked. What part of that goes to ETs? Time travel? What part of Q 'tasking is in those areas? Does holding proofs offline or memes require ET Antarctic bases, reptilian hybrids time travel?
Does that info exist as intel? Maybe but if we can't riddle out how the DS has been screwing us for years and the bastards behind it those holes are distractions. One set of problems at a time.
check out the last superbowl half-time show
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3600389/posts
I had to go find this story - our parents’ histories fascinate me -
The Landlady’s Tale a Halloween FreeRepublic Tradition
Thanks.
I keep refining my theory as new info becomes known to me. During the early stages of this operation, there were just so many pieces that did not make any sense.
One of the first things that didn’t make sense to me was the absolute hysteria and anger over Trump’s election. Think about that. Yes, we know the left is nuts, hysterical, and angry. But the absolute meltdown levels of behavior we saw were unprecedented. AFAIK, no one rioted when Bush was elected, despite the protests over hanging chads and recounts. AFAIK, the newsreaders in 2000 were not crying on tv, or screaming with rage. So I started trying to figure out why the over-the-top reactions.
My explanation is that those at the bottom are easily led. But those at the top are in fear for their lives. They are guilty of capital crimes and they fear exposure, arrest, conviction, and possibly the death penalty. When you fear for your life, your behavior becomes extreme.
Knowing there is a Deep State explains a lot of what looks like irrationality on the part of never-Trumpers who are supposedly conservatives. Not all, but some are most likely DS and guilty of crimes.
Similarly for trying to explain the actions of Trump and everyone around him, both pro-Trump and anti-Trump. The more you know, the more things fall into place and make sense.
The latest school shooting suspect has a Russian sounding name.
It made me think: What if all the orphans Americans are adopting from Slavic countries are toddlers who’ve been programmed to be unleashed some time in the future?
Orphanages would be a perfect place to experiment with mind control. They could test the babies to determine those most susceptible and actually change their developing minds.
Thanks.
No kidding. We have thousands and thousands of real, live deep state humans to neutralize before we can worry about non-standard threats.
It’s analytical thinking. Sad to say that most schools in the country have switched to rote leaning in order to “pass the tests”. Few teach methods of connecting dots and reaching conclusions.
Sometimes when dots are connected wrong materials are now purposely presented to squew the outcome. (Usually by the media. )
You’ve done a good job of connecting dots which keeps your results in the running of possibility
And you still leave the door open for other outcomes or new dots. That makes:
Good analysis A+
Wish all had that capacity!
Great thanks. It works. What do you think the problem is?
There is proof of the first, supposition of the latter. First has something to do with what Q is talking about, the second is masturbatory failing verifiable info.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.