Nunes said something the other day about 5 eyes. They were waiting to make sure that 5 eyes wasn’t involved before going forward with the next step, and they now had it and 5 eyes was not involved.
Wish I could remember all of it.
.
Nunes said something the other day about 5 eyes...
What he was saying is that they now knew the info on Pappadopolis did not come from any of the 5 eyes. Previously the FBI was saying they were tipped off by the Australian”eyes”. But we now know none of the 5 Intel agencies gave that info to the FBI. It is surmised that Hillary’s State Dept passed the info to the FBI which started the whole Russia Collusion investigation and FISA wiretapping.
The legal docs for USA v Concord Mngt and USA v Internet Research et al provided some interesting reading. Some of the info that the Concord attorneys have requested in appendix B are noted below:
B. Rule 12 Requests:
As a predicate to motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12, the government is requested to turn over to defense counsel and to disclose:
1. From 1945 to present, each and every instance where any officer, employee and/or agent of the United States Government engaged in operations to interfere with elections and political processes in any foreign country; including but not limited to information relating to whether any such activity utilized propaganda in any format, including but not limited to the use of social media.
This disclosure should include any and all information regarding the use of computer infrastructure inside and outside of the United States, false foreign identities, goals to sow discord in a foreign political system, assistance to a foreign elected official or candidate, attacks on a foreign elected official or candidate, assassination or conspiracy to assassinate a foreign elected official or candidate, buying political advertisements, posing as foreign persons and/or failure to honestly identify to foreign voters the involvement of any officer, employee or agent of the United States Government.
2. From 1945 to present, each and every instance where any United States or foreign person has been charged by the government with violating 18 U.S.C. 371, for allegedly impairing, obstructing and defeating lawful governmental functions of the United States by dishonest means in order to interfere with the United States’ political and electoral processes.
continued at link:https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000163-2d3b-d9b5-af73-ffff51b70001
And the judge did not grant a delay that SC requested.
I’ll be interested to see the transcript of those proceedings too.