Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: greeneyes; bagster; TEXOKIE; bitt; ransomnote; JockoManning; defconw; NIKK; All

The legal docs for USA v Concord Mngt and USA v Internet Research et al provided some interesting reading. Some of the info that the Concord attorneys have requested in appendix B are noted below:

B. Rule 12 Requests:
As a predicate to motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12, the government is requested to turn over to defense counsel and to disclose:

1. From 1945 to present, each and every instance where any officer, employee and/or agent of the United States Government engaged in operations to interfere with elections and political processes in any foreign country; including but not limited to information relating to whether any such activity utilized propaganda in any format, including but not limited to the use of social media.

This disclosure should include any and all information regarding the use of computer infrastructure inside and outside of the United States, false foreign identities, goals to sow discord in a foreign political system, assistance to a foreign elected official or candidate, attacks on a foreign elected official or candidate, assassination or conspiracy to assassinate a foreign elected official or candidate, buying political advertisements, posing as foreign persons and/or failure to honestly identify to foreign voters the involvement of any officer, employee or agent of the United States Government.

2. From 1945 to present, each and every instance where any United States or foreign person has been charged by the government with violating 18 U.S.C. 371, for allegedly impairing, obstructing and defeating lawful governmental functions of the United States by dishonest means in order to interfere with the United States’ political and electoral processes.

continued at link:https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000163-2d3b-d9b5-af73-ffff51b70001

And the judge did not grant a delay that SC requested.
I’ll be interested to see the transcript of those proceedings too.


89 posted on 05/06/2018 10:23:24 PM PDT by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: greeneyes
-- I'll be interested to see the transcript of those proceedings too. --

Defendant Concord Oppositon to Special Counsel's Motion to Continue

99 posted on 05/06/2018 10:32:00 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: greeneyes

Good post greeneyes, and I as well.


136 posted on 05/07/2018 5:12:58 AM PDT by STARLIT (Trust The Plan.Apr 21 2018 14:35:58 (EST) Anonymous ID: 03b5fb 1133796 america-has-spoken.png >>11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: greeneyes

You are so great at finding, keeping track, and posting so many different parts of the backstories that are going on.

I look forward to seeing what you find.

And now I am looking forward to reading the transcripts.


404 posted on 05/07/2018 4:34:59 PM PDT by Mazey (Missing the soft green hills of Western PA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson