Q Anon: (5/6/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 5/6/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[No_Doll_i]

I wouldn’t worry too much. I heard thru the grapevine the Bagster Times attorney was a stray cat named Frodo.

[Bob Ireland]

***Thank you for the splendid Lexicon***

Dittos! I'm shoor. And thanks RN for keeping us current on this Q freeway! :^O

[STARLIT]

Maryam Rajavi ‏-

To tackle the Iranian crisis, the International Community needs to take the following step.

Farmers in Isfahan on their 56th day of #IranProtests chant "Reprobates" at the police flanking their rally. Today's footage via MEK activists in #Iran. The farmers' protests are over the re-routing of Zayanderud River which has destroyed the local agriculture. FYI:

Farmers in Isfahan on their 56th day of #IranProtests chant "Reprobates" at the police flanking their rally. Today's footage via MEK activists in #Iran. The farmers' protests are over the re-routing of Zayanderud River which has destroyed the local agriculture. FYI: @USAdarFarsi pic.twitter.com/U1vnhSGWlP— M. Hanif Jazayeri (@HanifJazayeri) April 12, 2018

[Cboldt]

-- Have any of the FISA judges been fired or resigned recently? --

It's a weird court. Judges from the federal system are selected by CJ of SCOTUS, and serve a term of years on FISC, so there is constant membership rotation.

And then, there is only one or two at the court on any given day, because the members do their regular court duty 3 or 4 weeks, then a week at FISC, then back to the regular duty, etc.

The heavy lifting is taking care of formalities, which is the only thing the judges check. DOJ and FBI are given complete trust by FISC. All in secret, trust them to protect your privacy. Hahahahah.

Sure,. Trust a government that is unable to restrain itself and is unwilling to show itself. Great formula.

[No_Doll_i]

I really think one of the things that will happen after a lot this FISA stuff comes to light is a completely new system for anything FISA. What a screwed up system.

[Cboldt]

-- I really think one of the things that will happen after a lot this FISA stuff comes to light is a completely new system for anything FISA. --

Sure, good make work for the legislators and lawyers. Give the people the impression "something is being done about it," and voila, we'll have a mix of TSA and FISA snooping around our junk.

The only reason FISA exists is to mislead the public that government snooping is carefully controlled. Give.me.a.break Well that and make good-paying work for judges and lawyers.

[STARLIT]

https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/

Hillary R. Clinton Part 01 of 21

Hillary R. Clinton Part 01 of 05.pdf — PDF document, 2,953 kB (3,024,891 bytes)

[No_Doll_i]

I was thinking more along the lines of getting rid of the whole horrid mess.

[STARLIT]

Flat Tax #1

So the rules of using "approved" information systems by the OIG and FAM were IGNORED! Concerns from other State employees were "discouraged" when they brought up Killery's UNAUTHORIZED use of private email..so in the end RULES didn't apply to Hillary because she is ABOVE the law!

special treatment and now a cover up by the John Bentel Director of the S/ES-IRM took the 5th 87 times during the investigation on Clinton's server!

[No_Doll_i]

Geez Check out Corsi’s latest Twetter rant.

https://twitter.com/jerome_corsi?lang=en

He has really gone off the rails.

[STARLIT]

Tesla's Muse ‏ -

Here they say that the data from some of the devices that she probably smashed with a hammer was found on one of their backup spy databases. This may be a direct message to the deep state, "we have everything".

[Unrepentant VN Vet]

(Dropping back into Serious Mode)

If you wish to discuss necessary changes to the FISA court system, perhaps the conversation should expand to include the entire Federal Judicial System.....DOJ, Supreme Court, Appellate Courts (Particularly the 9th)....the_whole_damn_system.

And after we get done with that Battle Royal, we go after Tort Reform.

...real troublemaker tonight, ain’t I?

[Bob Ireland]

Can we be at all sure that the Iranian people want to be rid of their nuclear program? Wanting more freedom does not necessarily equate with disarmament.

[No_Doll_i]

Yikes! That is a conversation for a whole different time!!

Can we start with an election system that has a chance of not being rigged first?

[Cboldt]

-- I was thinking more along the lines of getting rid of the whole horrid mess. --

That would suit me. It doesn't make sense to create a secret space that has to be paid for extra, for no gain in privacy.

The government has the right to snoop without a warrant, see US v US District Court [Keith], 407 U.S. 297 (1972), the case that "spurred" the creation of the FISA system.

The issue before us is an important one for the people of our country and their Government. It involves the delicate question of the President's power, acting through the Attorney General, to authorize electronic surveillance in internal security matters without prior judicial approval. Successive Presidents for more than one-quarter of a century have authorized such surveillance in varying degrees, without guidance from the Congress or a definitive decision of this Court. This case brings the issue here for the first time. Its resolution is a matter of national concern, requiring sensitivity both to the Government's right to protect itself from unlawful subversion and attack and to the citizen's right to be secure in his privacy against unreasonable Government intrusion. ...

Bear in mind that this case sits on a house of cards created by the court in the first place, beginning with SCOTUS holding that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy (at all) in electronic/telephonic communication. Mean no warrant required for wiretapping, no violation of the 4th amendment.

Government will always use surveillance to the extent money and technology permit - "legal" limitations mean nothing. The government lies about this, because if it told the truth, the people would rebel. So, Congress, the courts, and even the executive all make the right couping sounds (I did that on purpose) to lull the people into a sense that the government actually respects the constitution.

About as much as I respect the government.

[weston]

Nunes said something the other day about 5 eyes...

What he was saying is that they now knew the info on Pappadopolis did not come from any of the 5 eyes. Previously the FBI was saying they were tipped off by the Australian”eyes”. But we now know none of the 5 Intel agencies gave that info to the FBI. It is surmised that Hillary’s State Dept passed the info to the FBI which started the whole Russia Collusion investigation and FISA wiretapping.

[cibco]

.

[bagster]

I’m currently being sued by The Bagster Times for misleading information.

We can settle out of court.

What time you get off work?

*wink*

Bagster

[weston]

Great find.
Thank God for Admiral Rogers.
It’s a relief every time there’s another confirmation of “we have everything”

[bagster]

Ha.

I'll see you in court too, missy.

Bagster