Q Anon: (5/6/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

I’ll just say: White hat, black hat, gray hat, leveraged hat—

They are all HAT and NO CATTLE.

POTUS has a RED HAT and ALL THE CATTLE

1,241 posted on 05/08/2018 1:09:42 PM PDT by greeneyes

1,242 posted on 05/08/2018 1:13:11 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Q is Admiral Michael S. Rogers)

Used to be hidden in the Peace sign, now it’s just blatant. I think we need to declare a day of FASTING and prayer. Sundown to sundown.

1,243 posted on 05/08/2018 1:13:28 PM PDT by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)

He speaks...

3:50 p.m.

Former President Barack Obama is calling President Donald Trump’s decision to pull out of the Iran deal a “serious mistake” that will erode America’s global credibility.

Obama also warned: “The consistent flouting of agreements that our country is a party to risks eroding America’s credibility, and puts us at odds with the world’s major powers.”

Obama says that without the deal, the U.S. “could eventually be left with a losing choice between a nuclear-armed Iran or another war in the Middle East.”

He says the deal remains a model for what diplomacy can accomplish, including when it comes to North Korea.

https://apnews.com/7769da33651a449196128dbdf1bcf48c

1,244 posted on 05/08/2018 1:18:21 PM PDT by StormFlag (Drain the swamp, but don't forget the disinfectant.)

PREPARE TO BARF:

~~~~~~~~

Barack Obama 41 mins ·

There are few issues more important to the security of the United States than the potential spread of nuclear weapons, or the potential for even more destructive war in the Middle East. That’s why the United States negotiated the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in the first place.

The reality is clear. The JCPOA is working – that is a view shared by our European allies, independent experts, and the current U.S. Secretary of Defense. The JCPOA is in America’s interest – it has significantly rolled back Iran’s nuclear program. And the JCPOA is a model for what diplomacy can accomplish – its inspections and verification regime is precisely what the United States should be working to put in place with North Korea. Indeed, at a time when we are all rooting for diplomacy with North Korea to succeed, walking away from the JCPOA risks losing a deal that accomplishes – with Iran – the very outcome that we are pursuing with the North Koreans.

That is why today’s announcement is so misguided. Walking away from the JCPOA turns our back on America’s closest allies, and an agreement that our country’s leading diplomats, scientists, and intelligence professionals negotiated. In a democracy, there will always be changes in policies and priorities from one Administration to the next. But the consistent flouting of agreements that our country is a party to risks eroding America’s credibility, and puts us at odds with the world’s major powers.

Debates in our country should be informed by facts, especially debates that have proven to be divisive. So it’s important to review several facts about the JCPOA. First, the JCPOA was not just an agreement between my Administration and the Iranian government. After years of building an international coalition that could impose crippling sanctions on Iran, we reached the JCPOA together with the United Kingdom, France, Germany, the European Union, Russia, China, and Iran. It is a multilateral arms control deal, unanimously endorsed by a United Nations Security Council Resolution.

Second, the JCPOA has worked in rolling back Iran’s nuclear program. For decades, Iran had steadily advanced its nuclear program, approaching the point where they could rapidly produce enough fissile material to build a bomb. The JCPOA put a lid on that breakout capacity. Since the JCPOA was implemented, Iran has destroyed the core of a reactor that could have produced weapons-grade plutonium; removed two-thirds of its centrifuges (over 13,000) and placed them under international monitoring; and eliminated 97 percent of its stockpile of enriched uranium – the raw materials necessary for a bomb. So by any measure, the JCPOA has imposed strict limitations on Iran's nuclear program and achieved real results.

Third, the JCPOA does not rely on trust – it is rooted in the most far-reaching inspections and verification regime ever negotiated in an arms control deal. Iran’s nuclear facilities are strictly monitored. International monitors also have access to Iran’s entire nuclear supply chain, so that we can catch them if they cheat. Without the JCPOA, this monitoring and inspections regime would go away. Fourth, Iran is complying with the JCPOA. That was not simply the view of my Administration. The United States intelligence community has continued to find that Iran is meeting its responsibilities under the deal, and has reported as much to Congress. So have our closest allies, and the international agency responsible for verifying Iranian compliance – the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Fifth, the JCPOA does not expire. The prohibition on Iran ever obtaining a nuclear weapon is permanent. Some of the most important and intrusive inspections codified by the JCPOA are permanent. Even as some of the provisions in the JCPOA do become less strict with time, this won’t happen until ten, fifteen, twenty, or twenty-five years into the deal, so there is little reason to put those restrictions at risk today.

Finally, the JCPOA was never intended to solve all of our problems with Iran. We were clear-eyed that Iran engages in destabilizing behavior – including support for terrorism, and threats toward Israel and its neighbors. But that’s precisely why it was so important that we prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Every aspect of Iranian behavior that is troubling is far more dangerous if their nuclear program is unconstrained. Our ability to confront Iran’s destabilizing behavior – and to sustain a unity of purpose with our allies – is strengthened with the JCPOA, and weakened without it.

Because of these facts, I believe that the decision to put the JCPOA at risk without any Iranian violation of the deal is a serious mistake. Without the JCPOA, the United States could eventually be left with a losing choice between a nuclear-armed Iran or another war in the Middle East. We all know the dangers of Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon. It could embolden an already dangerous regime; threaten our friends with destruction; pose unacceptable dangers to America’s own security; and trigger an arms race in the world’s most dangerous region. If the constraints on Iran’s nuclear program under the JCPOA are lost, we could be hastening the day when we are faced with the choice between living with that threat, or going to war to prevent it.

In a dangerous world, America must be able to rely in part on strong, principled diplomacy to secure our country. We have been safer in the years since we achieved the JCPOA, thanks in part to the work of our diplomats, many members of Congress, and our allies. Going forward, I hope that Americans continue to speak out in support of the kind of strong, principled, fact-based, and unifying leadership that can best secure our country and uphold our responsibilities around the globe.

1,245 posted on 05/08/2018 1:20:39 PM PDT by bitt (Back when we had CHILD CONTROL we really didn't need GUN CONTROL)

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Heshmat Alavi
‏ @HeshmatAlavi

#BREAKING
Less than two hours following Trump's decision to exit the JCPOA, 
Israeli airstrike reportedly targeting #Iran'ian weapons convey near Damascus, #Syria.

1,246 posted on 05/08/2018 1:20:56 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Q is Admiral Michael S. Rogers)

What foreign country is he in today?

1,247 posted on 05/08/2018 1:21:30 PM PDT by No_Doll_i

1,248 posted on 05/08/2018 1:21:42 PM PDT by Steven W.

I made a fool of myself over Sessions, defending him.

I have been a huge fan of Gowdy’s mouth. A cranium gifted legal eagle and wordsmith. Painfully heard his silence for Trump, When he was heard taking unchacteristicaly cheap shots, unnecessarily, at an already embattled president, I turned. Like Sessions, I came to wonder if they could ever redeem themselves. Very sad.

Of course, I do hope your scenario could play out, after such great damage has been done and Sessions, as well.

1,249 posted on 05/08/2018 1:21:45 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Ed/Academia are the farm team for more Marxists coming, infini)

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Heshmat Alavi
‏ @HeshmatAlavi

#Iran's Rouhani says the regime will remain in the #IranDeal.
"From this moment forward the JCPOA is between Iran & five countries."

1,250 posted on 05/08/2018 1:22:09 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Q is Admiral Michael S. Rogers)

In the New Testament Christ refers o Peter as The Rock upon whom he will build his church because of his profession of Faith

Matthew 16:17-19

Peter’s Confession of Christ

…17 Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah! For this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by My Father in heaven. 18 And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”…

Amen...

1,251 posted on 05/08/2018 1:23:23 PM PDT by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)

To: aMorePerfectUnion

1,252 posted on 05/08/2018 1:23:26 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Q is Admiral Michael S. Rogers)

1,253 posted on 05/08/2018 1:23:36 PM PDT by bitt (Back when we had CHILD CONTROL we really didn't need GUN CONTROL)

1,254 posted on 05/08/2018 1:24:10 PM PDT by StormFlag (Drain the swamp, but don't forget the disinfectant.)

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Anna Ahronheim
‏Verified account @AAhronheim
55m55 minutes ago

#BREAKING: INITIAL AND UNCONFIRMED reports of #Israel air force jets carrying out strikes in #Syria.

1,255 posted on 05/08/2018 1:24:46 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Q is Admiral Michael S. Rogers)

“got caught up in the discussion and jumping all over the web”

That’s usually MY reaction, lol....didn’t see you so went right to it..

1,256 posted on 05/08/2018 1:25:16 PM PDT by bitt (Back when we had CHILD CONTROL we really didn't need GUN CONTROL)

My perfectly running 1943 model N would beg to differ on that, plus the gobs of other old yard equipment I’ve had, used or worked on.

Maybe he started off with an FH, they had some issues. Their big ones could hold up with Wisconsins if well cared for.

1,257 posted on 05/08/2018 1:25:27 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)

To: little jeremiah

Good bad the leveraged.

1,258 posted on 05/08/2018 1:26:03 PM PDT by xone

To: aMorePerfectUnion

1,259 posted on 05/08/2018 1:26:26 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Q is Admiral Michael S. Rogers)

To: aMorePerfectUnion

1,260 posted on 05/08/2018 1:27:14 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Q is Admiral Michael S. Rogers)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794