Q Anon: (5/4/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 5/4/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Each live stream video remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronym definitions to help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

Click the following link for the latest edition of the Bagster Bee.

#~~~THE BAGSTER BEE~~~#

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[TXnMA]

There was an earlier 2016 request that was rejected by the FISA Court.

[hoosiermama]

Thank Q
Read an interesting article (IIRC from Sundance ) stating that RR didn’t know about the corruption until two weeks after he signed the FISA papers. (Is that even possible?)

[Kalam]

I’ve been away for my youngest daughters graduation getting her masters degree. One Proud Papa. I will be leaving for home soon and will be gone again. But I had to respond to inflammatory AG Sessions comments.

For whatever reason people refuse to look at the obvious elements of the AG Sessions case. Yes, he was the Senator that jumped on the Trump Train early in the campaign. However, that is merely the beginning.

First:
Consider the Presidents past as he deals with those not meeting his standards. He fires them, and I mean, Pronto. Over and over we see President Trump operate this way. Attorney General Jeff Sessions would have been removed at the pleasure of the President if he wasn’t doing exactly what needed doing (PERIOD).

Second:
The information has been available to anyone willing to look, that it was essential for the President and his team to use disinformation. This ruse was/is necessary to make it possible to keep the bad guys/black hats unaware of what was really happening and catch them in the act. Others on the team have added more fuel to the fire (disguise).

Third:
Even from the early days when AG Sessions was catching flack about going after the drug pushers and not going after the real criminals, to today when he is catching flack for not handing over (probable) classified material to House and/or Senate committees, AG Sessions never once gave a defense for what he has done. The closest thing to acting this way was when he divulged important information regarding activating Huber.

For these reasons it is clear that AG Sessions is operating under the cover of incompetence while doing the hard work of gathering the cases against the treasonous deep state and politicians with the Presidents full support.

Finally, for those nincompoop freepers that are bashing AG Sessions; even if you skip point #2 and the whole Q disinformation angle, it should still be easy to see that the AG is doing exactly what the President wants done to clean the swamp.

[greeneyes]

Judge Piro was so good on this - I watched her twice.

[hoosiermama]

Thanks. Just jumping back in after a hectic church morning

[Cboldt]

-- But my basic question was with respect to written vs verbal instructions. --

I tried to answer that. Obvious failure on may part.

The written over verbal principle applies when there is a conflict. There is no conflict here. Rosenstein and Mueller (who entered into both verbal and written agreements) agree on the scope of Mueller's jurisdiction. There is no conflict, so we don't have to choose between verbal and written representations of the agreement.

Additionally, Rosenstein handed Mueller a stack of case files and said something to the effect that those cases were now Mueller's cases. That's unambiguous. Was that passing of files in writing? Probably, somewhere there is some sort of record of who has the case.

Looking at the question of written over verbal, that rule applies. I think your question is more along the lines of "if it isn;t writen, does Mueller have the jurisdiction?" Or "What is Mueller's jurisdiction." Again, see passing of case files, and maybe the Manafort EDVA case was handled by verbal agreement first, later backed with written confirmation.

[Bob Ireland]

***Keep in mind that the speaker of the House does not have to be a congressman. So, Dems could elect a Hillary or even an Obama as speaker ***

The Democ🐀s are a perverse criminal bunch of traitors making up a political party...

***and then that person would be 3rd in line***

Of course the Constitution could not allow 0bama to re-attain the WH... not that the Dems are bound by the Constitution! 😠

[hoosiermama]

Excellent analysis

[Pearls Before Swine]

I’ll reply to that with a “Snort!”

[ichabod1]

See, if they are not keeping up with this thread, they do not know that it was fully right and proper that the first thing Mr. Sessions did was to attack MS-13, as we know now that they were part of the 0-bama private army, with invasion plans and legions awaiting go time in Central America.

[hoosiermama]

Can’t imagine any judge being too happy if it appears that Mueller’s team is manipulating evidence by redaction of claiming “super secret decoder conversations” from RR. IMO if anything RR has set a trap for them

[Cboldt]

-- Read an interesting article (IIRC from Sundance ) stating that RR didn't know about the corruption until two weeks after he signed the FISA papers. (Is that even possible?) --

Why Did DOJ Asst. AG Rod Rosenstein Reauthorize FISA Warrant on July 18th, 2017?

I don't find the contention that RR was ignorant of the thrust and bias of team Mueller, months after team Mueller was assembled. Rosenstein and Mueller agree on the scope and targets of Mueller's assignment.

There's a good chance that neither of them sees anything in the nature of corruption in their actions. Maybe both are #NeverTrump people and feel getting Trump is the right thing to do. They may view Trump as a clever criminal who has so far just managed to evade detection by evidence.

There is no way to get into their heads, and FWIW, my presumption is they are chronic liars anyway. Show the evidence, make your arguments, etc. Of course they are biased, they are in an adversarial profession, and are inclined to go to extremes in order to get what they perceive as "just."

[Bob Ireland]

***to heck with waiting for 2020***

I strongly suspect Hildy is planning a WH occupation by whatever means. She has re-energized the Clintooon Foundation, who would contribute millions unless they thought there was some advantage to be gained? she has come up with more excuses why she should not have lost the election of 2016...

As far as Hillary in 2020, I doubt she has that long... not that she would think so, of course.

[stylin19a]

Were they new or extensions ? Why were both FBI & DOJ sign-offs needed ?
The FEDs consider Page a foreign agent of Russia. does that make him foreign or domestic or both ?

Judge Collier was pretty specific regarding what can and can’t be shared (inter-agency wise among other things)in her memorandum of 04/2017.
There were recurring reporting requirements from Intel to the court that I haven’t been able to find,(they aren’t part of public filings) nor have I found any MSM reporting that the reports were even made.

I’m assuming the reports were made to the court and passed muster otherwise the 7/2017 wouldn’t have been approved ?

BTW...thanks for all your expertise & info ...do you have a ping list ?

[Steven W.]

Great thread here on HRC server and new revelations from HRC FOIA + F-I Vault: https://twitter.com/almostjingo/status/993017076917747712

1. The HRC e-mail server was backed up at dattobackup.com

2. The server was hacked in 2009 via "Poison Ivy" malware and it appears some SUCKER in HRC camp actually then sent a $25K wire (to Nigeria or something ROFLMAO?!?!?!?!)

[Cboldt]

Over on the Sunday waste-time thread (and maybe here too) I memntioned that Sessions may be Chinese walled by his inferiors. His recusal from subject matters of Trump campaign and Hillary misconduct will be kept off his desk - the Chinese wall may be also excluding matters that pertain the FBI and DOJ misconduct, neither of which is Trump campaign or Hillary matters.

This interescts with Mueller in that whatever Mueller has, even if it is stuff that Sessions has not recused from, is also kept off Sessions' desk.

I would expect the DOJ to sandbag Sessions, even attempt to get him fired. They do not like him, and preferred to work in the "anything goes" "damn the rule of law" environment they enjoyed for the past few decades.

[Steven W.]

[txhurl]

Wait, wait: Cheryl Mills and her Black Ivy energy investments in Africa.

[stylin19a]

nice pallets...

[little jeremiah]

Excellent points.

A small addendum - The DOJ is going after illegal criminals/drug pushers, especially MS-13. This is no small thing, as they have been allowed in by the black hats, and apparently are foot soldiers for the black hats. And in the event of disruptions (which the black hats want), MS-13 and their ilk would then be used to create violence (along with other groups such as Antifa).

So the DOJ going after dopers/MS-13 and other illegal criminals is very important and part of the plan.